Anonymous
Post 08/21/2024 14:25     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:So we've got: Florida, Arizona, Montana - which other states have abortion ballots this time?


https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/dashboard/ballot-tracker-status-of-abortion-related-state-constitutional-amendment-measures/

9 states will be on the ballot in November 2024:
Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, South Dakota, Maryland, New York

1 signatures submitted for approval, pending:
Nebraska

1 state citizens appealing Secretary of State's disqualification of a ballot initiative
Arkansas
Anonymous
Post 08/21/2024 10:28     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yesssssss


YES


I think abortion should definitely be a ballot issue to be voted on at every state level.

Does anyone know how exactly the issue will be worded in the Montana ballot? Because it's all about the wording too.

Agree but not every state has a mechanism for a ballot referendum.

I think this is the Montana ballot wording but not 100% sure.
Anonymous
Post 08/21/2024 10:27     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

So we've got: Florida, Arizona, Montana - which other states have abortion ballots this time?
Anonymous
Post 08/21/2024 10:17     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yesssssss


YES


I think abortion should definitely be a ballot issue to be voted on at every state level.

Does anyone know how exactly the issue will be worded in the Montana ballot? Because it's all about the wording too.


Until it can be legislated at the national level.
Anonymous
Post 08/21/2024 10:15     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yesssssss


YES


I think abortion should definitely be a ballot issue to be voted on at every state level.

Does anyone know how exactly the issue will be worded in the Montana ballot? Because it's all about the wording too.
Anonymous
Post 08/21/2024 03:19     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:Yesssssss


YES
Anonymous
Post 08/21/2024 01:45     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Yesssssss
Anonymous
Post 08/20/2024 18:40     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:

May karma visit each person who was involved with bringing this case


Crickets from the forced birthers
Anonymous
Post 08/19/2024 12:38     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
aka piecemealing women's lives by chance


That’s what the GOP wants though, for women’s lives to become a sick game of roulette. Free state or Christian nationalist state? Big city that might have doctors or might not have doctors? Do you have enough money to get out if you find out your fetus doesn’t have kidneys, or do you get to carry to term and deliver a dying child?

They call it “states rights” but what they mean is that women aren’t people and they always worth less than the contents of their uterus.


+1
Anonymous
Post 08/19/2024 05:44     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

May karma visit each person who was involved with bringing this case

My sentiments are stronger worded in my head, but our feelings are the same.

And deliver the hundreds of girls, literal girls under 18, currently carrying their rapist’s baby. I don’t think that’s a good thing at any age (or a “blessing” as the goopy brained monsters in the forced birther movement would say), but the idea of bearing a pregnancy to term when you’re a literal child and it could kill you adds layers of horror.


The sadists love hurting kids too. Their depravity knows no bounds.

Anonymous
Post 08/13/2024 16:57     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:

May karma visit each person who was involved with bringing this case

My sentiments are stronger worded in my head, but our feelings are the same.

And deliver the hundreds of girls, literal girls under 18, currently carrying their rapist’s baby. I don’t think that’s a good thing at any age (or a “blessing” as the goopy brained monsters in the forced birther movement would say), but the idea of bearing a pregnancy to term when you’re a literal child and it could kill you adds layers of horror.
Anonymous
Post 08/13/2024 16:53     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Exactly. And may the child go on without carrying this forward while we remember for her.
Anonymous
Post 08/13/2024 16:28     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down



May karma visit each person who was involved with bringing this case
Anonymous
Post 08/13/2024 13:56     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
aka piecemealing women's lives by chance


That’s what the GOP wants though, for women’s lives to become a sick game of roulette. Free state or Christian nationalist state? Big city that might have doctors or might not have doctors? Do you have enough money to get out if you find out your fetus doesn’t have kidneys, or do you get to carry to term and deliver a dying child?

They call it “states rights” but what they mean is that women aren’t people and they always worth less than the contents of their uterus.
Anonymous
Post 08/13/2024 12:10     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:

Awesome!