Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Pro-Ukrainian poster, I echo the PP above and ask you to please limit the written diarrhea.

Often your massive blocks of texts really don't pertain to the direction of the discussion, and they're so long people don't fully read them anyway.

It makes you nearly as irritating, sometimes, as the pro-Russian troll, who just posts laughable nonsense.

Everything you say does make me question who you are. If you were Ukrainian, I would think you'd be interested in multiple reference links about how the War is going back home? Strange.

In short, longer posts with multiple topic areas help to defeat AI programs. AI programs work best on short paragraphs with low information content value. This permits the AI to counter in a 1:1 fashion. When multiple themes are presented to the AI, it becomes confused following the thread and tends to make mistakes. Once the AI becomes tripped up like this, it needs to be reset, since it's machine learning weights have been tainted with disjointed facts that aren't conducive to propaganda.

Longer posts will also irritate people with different points of view and opinions, since I've noticed that there are a lot of opinions and comments without research to back it up. The irritation is somewhat intentional. A Russian propagandist blogging doesn't have the luxury to reason out non-approved themes unless they're senior level - and even that's a risk. This limits their ability to maneuver on topics, or they risk upsetting their superiors.

But if you're Ukrainian, you already know this (or should). After all, you received a daily dose of it?

The thing is that your posts aren’t reasoning it out. They are more of a data dump with little reason or logic. I think you’re altogether exaggerating their literary or research value. They are boring and clearly designed to further a point of view rather than a diversity of sources.

to paraphrase your complaint: "Stop with all of your pesky facts! You make it hard for the russian operators and their attempt at snarky one-liners!"

Sorry but I disagree with you and welcome the long posts. The more facts and details, the better. A big part of the problem with politics is that too much of it is superficial and emotion-based, lacking in detail.

No one has ALL the facts and neither does that poster. You cannot seriously argue that the long winded poster is all about facts and never passion. She’s like the definition of arguing with emotion and calling anyone who disagrees troll.

Stop your whining. You aren't the boss of this forum. If other people want to make long posts THEY CAN whether you like it or not. Suck it up.

They are free to do it and I’m free to mock them.

You are, but you’re playing to an audience of one (if it’s possible to be your own audience).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone want to opine on Zelensky firing his defense minister because the war “calls for new approaches”?

Reznikov can probably use a break. I've heard he may be getting moved to another prominent role. Meanwhile his replacement is a Crimean Tatar. Who has more skin in the game than a Crimean Tatar?

Lol that’s exactly what you do in the middle of war when you are happy with how it’s going - send your top man on vacation. Cause he’s tiiiired.

As opposed to the Russians who have disappeared their generals through assassination, arrest, and firing en masse. Nobody loses quite like the Russians…

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Pro-Ukrainian poster, I echo the PP above and ask you to please limit the written diarrhea.

Often your massive blocks of texts really don't pertain to the direction of the discussion, and they're so long people don't fully read them anyway.

It makes you nearly as irritating, sometimes, as the pro-Russian troll, who just posts laughable nonsense.

Everything you say does make me question who you are. If you were Ukrainian, I would think you'd be interested in multiple reference links about how the War is going back home? Strange.

In short, longer posts with multiple topic areas help to defeat AI programs. AI programs work best on short paragraphs with low information content value. This permits the AI to counter in a 1:1 fashion. When multiple themes are presented to the AI, it becomes confused following the thread and tends to make mistakes. Once the AI becomes tripped up like this, it needs to be reset, since it's machine learning weights have been tainted with disjointed facts that aren't conducive to propaganda.

Longer posts will also irritate people with different points of view and opinions, since I've noticed that there are a lot of opinions and comments without research to back it up. The irritation is somewhat intentional. A Russian propagandist blogging doesn't have the luxury to reason out non-approved themes unless they're senior level - and even that's a risk. This limits their ability to maneuver on topics, or they risk upsetting their superiors.

But if you're Ukrainian, you already know this (or should). After all, you received a daily dose of it?

The thing is that your posts aren’t reasoning it out. They are more of a data dump with little reason or logic. I think you’re altogether exaggerating their literary or research value. They are boring and clearly designed to further a point of view rather than a diversity of sources.

to paraphrase your complaint: "Stop with all of your pesky facts! You make it hard for the russian operators and their attempt at snarky one-liners!"

Sorry but I disagree with you and welcome the long posts. The more facts and details, the better. A big part of the problem with politics is that too much of it is superficial and emotion-based, lacking in detail.

No one has ALL the facts and neither does that poster. You cannot seriously argue that the long winded poster is all about facts and never passion. She’s like the definition of arguing with emotion and calling anyone who disagrees troll.

Stop your whining. You aren't the boss of this forum. If other people want to make long posts THEY CAN whether you like it or not. Suck it up.

They are free to do it and I’m free to mock them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Pro-Ukrainian poster, I echo the PP above and ask you to please limit the written diarrhea.

Often your massive blocks of texts really don't pertain to the direction of the discussion, and they're so long people don't fully read them anyway.

It makes you nearly as irritating, sometimes, as the pro-Russian troll, who just posts laughable nonsense.

Everything you say does make me question who you are. If you were Ukrainian, I would think you'd be interested in multiple reference links about how the War is going back home? Strange.

In short, longer posts with multiple topic areas help to defeat AI programs. AI programs work best on short paragraphs with low information content value. This permits the AI to counter in a 1:1 fashion. When multiple themes are presented to the AI, it becomes confused following the thread and tends to make mistakes. Once the AI becomes tripped up like this, it needs to be reset, since it's machine learning weights have been tainted with disjointed facts that aren't conducive to propaganda.

Longer posts will also irritate people with different points of view and opinions, since I've noticed that there are a lot of opinions and comments without research to back it up. The irritation is somewhat intentional. A Russian propagandist blogging doesn't have the luxury to reason out non-approved themes unless they're senior level - and even that's a risk. This limits their ability to maneuver on topics, or they risk upsetting their superiors.

But if you're Ukrainian, you already know this (or should). After all, you received a daily dose of it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone want to opine on Zelensky firing his defense minister because the war “calls for new approaches”?

Reznikov can probably use a break. I've heard he may be getting moved to another prominent role. Meanwhile his replacement is a Crimean Tatar. Who has more skin in the game than a Crimean Tatar?

Lol that’s exactly what you do in the middle of war when you are happy with how it’s going - send your top man on vacation. Cause he’s tiiiired.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Pro-Ukrainian poster, I echo the PP above and ask you to please limit the written diarrhea.

Often your massive blocks of texts really don't pertain to the direction of the discussion, and they're so long people don't fully read them anyway.

It makes you nearly as irritating, sometimes, as the pro-Russian troll, who just posts laughable nonsense.

Everything you say does make me question who you are. If you were Ukrainian, I would think you'd be interested in multiple reference links about how the War is going back home? Strange.

In short, longer posts with multiple topic areas help to defeat AI programs. AI programs work best on short paragraphs with low information content value. This permits the AI to counter in a 1:1 fashion. When multiple themes are presented to the AI, it becomes confused following the thread and tends to make mistakes. Once the AI becomes tripped up like this, it needs to be reset, since it's machine learning weights have been tainted with disjointed facts that aren't conducive to propaganda.

Longer posts will also irritate people with different points of view and opinions, since I've noticed that there are a lot of opinions and comments without research to back it up. The irritation is somewhat intentional. A Russian propagandist blogging doesn't have the luxury to reason out non-approved themes unless they're senior level - and even that's a risk. This limits their ability to maneuver on topics, or they risk upsetting their superiors.

But if you're Ukrainian, you already know this (or should). After all, you received a daily dose of it?

The thing is that your posts aren’t reasoning it out. They are more of a data dump with little reason or logic. I think you’re altogether exaggerating their literary or research value. They are boring and clearly designed to further a point of view rather than a diversity of sources.

to paraphrase your complaint: "Stop with all of your pesky facts! You make it hard for the russian operators and their attempt at snarky one-liners!"

Sorry but I disagree with you and welcome the long posts. The more facts and details, the better. A big part of the problem with politics is that too much of it is superficial and emotion-based, lacking in detail.

No one has ALL the facts and neither does that poster. You cannot seriously argue that the long winded poster is all about facts and never passion. She’s like the definition of arguing with emotion and calling anyone who disagrees troll.

Stop your whining. You aren't the boss of this forum. If other people want to make long posts THEY CAN whether you like it or not. Suck it up.

They are free to do it and I’m free to mock them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone want to opine on Zelensky firing his defense minister because the war “calls for new approaches”?

Reznikov can probably use a break. I've heard he may be getting moved to another prominent role. Meanwhile his replacement is a Crimean Tatar. Who has more skin in the game than a Crimean Tatar?

Lol that’s exactly what you do in the middle of war when you are happy with how it’s going - send your top man on vacation. Cause he’s tiiiired.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Pro-Ukrainian poster, I echo the PP above and ask you to please limit the written diarrhea.

Often your massive blocks of texts really don't pertain to the direction of the discussion, and they're so long people don't fully read them anyway.

It makes you nearly as irritating, sometimes, as the pro-Russian troll, who just posts laughable nonsense.

Everything you say does make me question who you are. If you were Ukrainian, I would think you'd be interested in multiple reference links about how the War is going back home? Strange.

In short, longer posts with multiple topic areas help to defeat AI programs. AI programs work best on short paragraphs with low information content value. This permits the AI to counter in a 1:1 fashion. When multiple themes are presented to the AI, it becomes confused following the thread and tends to make mistakes. Once the AI becomes tripped up like this, it needs to be reset, since it's machine learning weights have been tainted with disjointed facts that aren't conducive to propaganda.

Longer posts will also irritate people with different points of view and opinions, since I've noticed that there are a lot of opinions and comments without research to back it up. The irritation is somewhat intentional. A Russian propagandist blogging doesn't have the luxury to reason out non-approved themes unless they're senior level - and even that's a risk. This limits their ability to maneuver on topics, or they risk upsetting their superiors.

But if you're Ukrainian, you already know this (or should). After all, you received a daily dose of it?

The thing is that your posts aren’t reasoning it out. They are more of a data dump with little reason or logic. I think you’re altogether exaggerating their literary or research value. They are boring and clearly designed to further a point of view rather than a diversity of sources.

to paraphrase your complaint: "Stop with all of your pesky facts! You make it hard for the russian operators and their attempt at snarky one-liners!"

Sorry but I disagree with you and welcome the long posts. The more facts and details, the better. A big part of the problem with politics is that too much of it is superficial and emotion-based, lacking in detail.

No one has ALL the facts and neither does that poster. You cannot seriously argue that the long winded poster is all about facts and never passion. She’s like the definition of arguing with emotion and calling anyone who disagrees troll.

Stop your whining. You aren't the boss of this forum. If other people want to make long posts THEY CAN whether you like it or not. Suck it up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone want to opine on Zelensky firing his defense minister because the war “calls for new approaches”?

Reznikov can probably use a break. I've heard he may be getting moved to another prominent role. Meanwhile his replacement is a Crimean Tatar. Who has more skin in the game than a Crimean Tatar?

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone want to opine on Zelensky firing his defense minister because the war “calls for new approaches”?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Pro-Ukrainian poster, I echo the PP above and ask you to please limit the written diarrhea.

Often your massive blocks of texts really don't pertain to the direction of the discussion, and they're so long people don't fully read them anyway.

It makes you nearly as irritating, sometimes, as the pro-Russian troll, who just posts laughable nonsense.

Everything you say does make me question who you are. If you were Ukrainian, I would think you'd be interested in multiple reference links about how the War is going back home? Strange.

In short, longer posts with multiple topic areas help to defeat AI programs. AI programs work best on short paragraphs with low information content value. This permits the AI to counter in a 1:1 fashion. When multiple themes are presented to the AI, it becomes confused following the thread and tends to make mistakes. Once the AI becomes tripped up like this, it needs to be reset, since it's machine learning weights have been tainted with disjointed facts that aren't conducive to propaganda.

Longer posts will also irritate people with different points of view and opinions, since I've noticed that there are a lot of opinions and comments without research to back it up. The irritation is somewhat intentional. A Russian propagandist blogging doesn't have the luxury to reason out non-approved themes unless they're senior level - and even that's a risk. This limits their ability to maneuver on topics, or they risk upsetting their superiors.

But if you're Ukrainian, you already know this (or should). After all, you received a daily dose of it?

The thing is that your posts aren’t reasoning it out. They are more of a data dump with little reason or logic. I think you’re altogether exaggerating their literary or research value. They are boring and clearly designed to further a point of view rather than a diversity of sources.

to paraphrase your complaint: "Stop with all of your pesky facts! You make it hard for the russian operators and their attempt at snarky one-liners!"

Sorry but I disagree with you and welcome the long posts. The more facts and details, the better. A big part of the problem with politics is that too much of it is superficial and emotion-based, lacking in detail.

No one has ALL the facts and neither does that poster. You cannot seriously argue that the long winded poster is all about facts and never passion. She’s like the definition of arguing with emotion and calling anyone who disagrees troll.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, we are engaged in an unwinnable war against Russia.

Russia has nukes, patience, no morals, and Putin. And Iranian drones. And trade with China & India.

Absolutely an unwinnable war that will accomplish little more than the near total annihilation of Ukraine and itscitizens.

This is the sad truth.

Who is "we" ?

If it is the US, no, the US is not at war with Russia, nor does it have troops on the ground there. If we is NATO, then, no, NATO is not at war in Ukraine either. At the moment, The Ukrainians are trying to get the Russians to leave their country. Yes, they have help from the US and other allies, and so far, it is going pretty well. The Russians have been losing ground for months, the troops have been losing morale and the Russian military is showing to be a fat and lazy bear.

In fact,

So when you say it is unwinnable, on what is that supposition based?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Pro-Ukrainian poster, I echo the PP above and ask you to please limit the written diarrhea.

Often your massive blocks of texts really don't pertain to the direction of the discussion, and they're so long people don't fully read them anyway.

It makes you nearly as irritating, sometimes, as the pro-Russian troll, who just posts laughable nonsense.

Everything you say does make me question who you are. If you were Ukrainian, I would think you'd be interested in multiple reference links about how the War is going back home? Strange.

In short, longer posts with multiple topic areas help to defeat AI programs. AI programs work best on short paragraphs with low information content value. This permits the AI to counter in a 1:1 fashion. When multiple themes are presented to the AI, it becomes confused following the thread and tends to make mistakes. Once the AI becomes tripped up like this, it needs to be reset, since it's machine learning weights have been tainted with disjointed facts that aren't conducive to propaganda.

Longer posts will also irritate people with different points of view and opinions, since I've noticed that there are a lot of opinions and comments without research to back it up. The irritation is somewhat intentional. A Russian propagandist blogging doesn't have the luxury to reason out non-approved themes unless they're senior level - and even that's a risk. This limits their ability to maneuver on topics, or they risk upsetting their superiors.

But if you're Ukrainian, you already know this (or should). After all, you received a daily dose of it?

The thing is that your posts aren’t reasoning it out. They are more of a data dump with little reason or logic. I think you’re altogether exaggerating their literary or research value. They are boring and clearly designed to further a point of view rather than a diversity of sources.

to paraphrase your complaint: "Stop with all of your pesky facts! You make it hard for the russian operators and their attempt at snarky one-liners!"

Sorry but I disagree with you and welcome the long posts. The more facts and details, the better. A big part of the problem with politics is that too much of it is superficial and emotion-based, lacking in detail.