Anyone want to speculate what this is about on Juliana's docket?

10/11/2024 02:43 PM LETTER Letter from Eric Clingan to Ryan Campbell filed. Placed in the file.

VA shows no disciplinary action against Ryan Campbell

https://vsb.org/Site/Shared_Content/Directory/va-lawyer-directory.aspx?hkey=fb40483e-6f0d-43a8-899b-2133585a3a1e

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have the prosecutors sought all communications between her attorney and the Banfields? They are not privileged.

If the attorney was trying to pass things along by cloaking them in privilege, he is going to be disbarred.

I got to tell ya. It’s been a wild ride so far.

That judge has to be fuming at the allegations.

Seems like she may have more than one lawyer repeating her. Seems the one that has been mentioned on here is reputable.

Sounds like these goofs hired a serious attorney and, in addition, big mamma also hired Saul Goodman.

Say what?

I got to tell ya. It’s been a wild ride so far.

I've been here for a while. Big Momma... that's mine.. tick tock.. mine too. rocket surgeon.. you guessed it. the great memes.. Homer Simpson.. superman..

this whole story is... well it's wild.

That judge has to be fuming at the allegations.

The judge, and others would be pissed at the misconduct allegations.

Seems like she may have more than one lawyer repeating (edit) representing...her. Seems the one that has been mentioned on here is reputable.

The lawyer mentioned previously seemed to have an upstanding reputation..

Sounds like these goofs hired a serious attorney and, in addition, big mamma also hired Saul Goodman.

I was giving the apparently reputable attorney the benefit of the doubt. maybe I was too generous.

This case just needs an investigator to be giving a witness the business for a blackout on my bingo card.

Anonymous wrote:Journos reading/posting on this thread pls. do more digging re: that hearing and the reputation of her lawyer.

Additional piece re: new allegations

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/i-d-give-it-to-her-jailhouse-communications-allegedly-reveal-covert-efforts-to-get-things-and-information-to-au-pair-indicted-in-sexual-fetish-conspiracy-double-murder/ar-AA1sjNvU

Nothing new here that wasn’t in the article posted a few hours ago.

Anyone else remember some poster claiming that the lawyer paid for by TB couldn't possibly be influencing JPM re: a plea deal?

Journos reading/posting on this thread pls. do more digging re: that hearing and the reputation of her lawyer.

Additional piece re: new allegations

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/i-d-give-it-to-her-jailhouse-communications-allegedly-reveal-covert-efforts-to-get-things-and-information-to-au-pair-indicted-in-sexual-fetish-conspiracy-double-murder/ar-AA1sjNvU

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hope they are wrong about that!

About?

Read the post above and all will become clear.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have the prosecutors sought all communications between her attorney and the Banfields? They are not privileged.

If the attorney was trying to pass things along by cloaking them in privilege, he is going to be disbarred.

I got to tell ya. It’s been a wild ride so far.

That judge has to be fuming at the allegations.

Seems like she may have more than one lawyer repeating her. Seems the one that has been mentioned on here is reputable.

Sounds like these goofs hired a serious attorney and, in addition, big mamma also hired Saul Goodman.

Say what?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The News4 video says that the hearing was held and judge was satisfied re: this issue.

What I understood was that the news station reached out to the attorney referenced in the affidavit. The attorney said the judge was satisfied.

This thing has gone from a dateline special to a full blown Netflix 4 part series.

its too unbelievable along with many many other aspects of this case.

It's no joke to execute a warrant for a device that has potentially privileged information on it. wild.

say what you will about big mamma.. she loves her boy. my momma told me she isn't going back to jail.. even for me.

Lol. We'll see if prosecutors take any action against Big Momma. Or the lawyer. Good get for News4, or good tip to them. We'll see what more comes out. The trial is quite soon too. Any VA lawyers remember similar allegations and what disciplinary action followed? It's like some hive mind psychosis they are all sharing, who would risk their livelihood re: trash like BB and JPM? Is Big Momma so rich that losing his license would be worth it? Hard to believe that. Who would go to FCJ and make threats knowing it's being recorded? They have all taken leave of their senses. Story just gets more insane.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The News4 video says that the hearing was held and judge was satisfied re: this issue.

What I understood was that the news station reached out to the attorney referenced in the affidavit. The attorney said the judge was satisfied.

This thing has gone from a dateline special to a full blown Netflix 4 part series.

its too unbelievable along with many many other aspects of this case.

It's no joke to execute a warrant for a device that has potentially privileged information on it. wild.

say what you will about big mamma.. she loves her boy. my momma told me she isn't going back to jail.. even for me.

Loves her boy more than her Granddaughter. Tragic.

Anonymous wrote:The News4 video says that the hearing was held and judge was satisfied re: this issue.

What I understood was that the news station reached out to the attorney referenced in the affidavit. The attorney said the judge was satisfied.

This thing has gone from a dateline special to a full blown Netflix 4 part series.

its too unbelievable along with many many other aspects of this case.

It's no joke to execute a warrant for a device that has potentially privileged information on it. wild.

say what you will about big mamma.. she loves her boy. my momma told me she isn't going back to jail.. even for me.

Anonymous wrote:Hope they are wrong about that!

About?

Anonymous wrote:The News4 video says that the hearing was held and judge was satisfied re: this issue.

The News 4 report says according to JPM's attorney the judge was satisfied. It is the attorney's version, and at that filtered through the news report. We actually do not know what the judge said in this "closed hearing" that the report says took place.

Hope they are wrong about that!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hopefully there will be additional coverage of the that search warrant and the hearing that was held with more details to be forthcoming. If the judge was satisfied that no letters were found, it must be the prosecutors that are fuming.

The NBC4 video posted has more details, the written story does not mention the hearing last month.

Looks like JPM is going to trial next month, with current legal team in place. SMH.

Does anyone know of a case with similar allegations re: the defense attorney?

Sorta similar, I think: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynne_Stewart

That one maybe she believed in the cause. But why risk disbarment over JPM? Everything about this case is so over the top, the Banfields and associates really do seem to believe rules don't apply to them.