Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems like there is a lawsuit here. Just look at page 40 of this report on AAP to FCPS:
https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/BPLQKV69B096/$file/FCPS%20final%20report%2005.05.20.pdf
“The review team is aware, around the country, of central administrators’ general hostility toward the concept of advanced education, but even we were surprised at the depth of that feeling among some FCPS central administrators and some principals. Even the idea that advanced students may have academic needs that cannot be met in the regular classroom was met with scorn by many FCPS personnel working in the central administration. When asked for support for their strong beliefs, they vaguely referred to “research” that gifted education does not work, or that teachers can effectively differentiate for the entire range of performance and ability levels they may find in their classrooms or that the implementation of strategies to increase growth mindset would be sufficient to address the educational needs of gifted students. Several administrators shared that they would do away with all AAP services if not for “the political blowback,” as one person phrased it (they were not aware that having advanced programming is required in Virginia, providing additional evidence that knowledge about advanced learning is in need of improvement among this group of FCPS educators).”
Yikes.
And take a glance at the data on pages 36-38. Double yikes.
Sounds like our recently retired principal. So infuriating.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems like there is a lawsuit here. Just look at page 40 of this report on AAP to FCPS:
https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/BPLQKV69B096/$file/FCPS%20final%20report%2005.05.20.pdf
“The review team is aware, around the country, of central administrators’ general hostility toward the concept of advanced education, but even we were surprised at the depth of that feeling among some FCPS central administrators and some principals. Even the idea that advanced students may have academic needs that cannot be met in the regular classroom was met with scorn by many FCPS personnel working in the central administration. When asked for support for their strong beliefs, they vaguely referred to “research” that gifted education does not work, or that teachers can effectively differentiate for the entire range of performance and ability levels they may find in their classrooms or that the implementation of strategies to increase growth mindset would be sufficient to address the educational needs of gifted students. Several administrators shared that they would do away with all AAP services if not for “the political blowback,” as one person phrased it (they were not aware that having advanced programming is required in Virginia, providing additional evidence that knowledge about advanced learning is in need of improvement among this group of FCPS educators).”
Yikes.
And take a glance at the data on pages 36-38. Double yikes.
Someone should email Kristen Maloney that section of the report with a highlight for Braband. Good grief. We all knew the crackpots at Central were just that, but to have it written in a report-what a fringin' mess!
Sounds like our recently retired principal. So infuriating.
Anonymous wrote:It seems like there is a lawsuit here. Just look at page 40 of this report on AAP to FCPS:
https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/BPLQKV69B096/$file/FCPS%20final%20report%2005.05.20.pdf
“The review team is aware, around the country, of central administrators’ general hostility toward the concept of advanced education, but even we were surprised at the depth of that feeling among some FCPS central administrators and some principals. Even the idea that advanced students may have academic needs that cannot be met in the regular classroom was met with scorn by many FCPS personnel working in the central administration. When asked for support for their strong beliefs, they vaguely referred to “research” that gifted education does not work, or that teachers can effectively differentiate for the entire range of performance and ability levels they may find in their classrooms or that the implementation of strategies to increase growth mindset would be sufficient to address the educational needs of gifted students. Several administrators shared that they would do away with all AAP services if not for “the political blowback,” as one person phrased it (they were not aware that having advanced programming is required in Virginia, providing additional evidence that knowledge about advanced learning is in need of improvement among this group of FCPS educators).”
Yikes.
And take a glance at the data on pages 36-38. Double yikes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a white family in my neighborhood that brought a lawyer to the table. Her kid was smart, not nearly that high IQ though.
One meeting with the lawyer and next thing the kid is at the LIV center.
Lawyer up folks. Get your friends together and do it if necessary. Demand transparency and guidelines. This is public school, the public has a say.
Any info on who the lawyer was?
I'm in. Are there any lawyers here who would be willing to get this started?
If people want to get together and pursue this further, I for one, am up for that. But we need to take it off this group and actually take real action. It isn’t even about our individual children, but about clarity in this whole process!
I am a lawyer. But I am not registered in VA. I was given the name of the lawyers that pursued Special Needs rights for FCPS (and how they were/are being restrained.) I may email them and ask if there is some sort of a class suit or quicker action to be taken. If anyone wants to find out, the names I was given was :
Kevin Byrnes
https://fhhfirm.com/kevin-byrnes
Regina Kline
https://www.browngold.com/team/gina-kline
Please keep us posted on their responses. I do think legal action may be the only recourse.
So I did connect with one of the attorneys. They said the problem is that courts or a jury would not view gifted kids as a protected class similar to special ed kids. The immediate judgement would be a bunch of helicopter parents. The only way this would have legs is to say that it unfairly affects a certain ethnicity. For example, if Asian Americans are held to a higher standard and not everyone is viewed objectively despite their race, there is something there. But gifted kids alone is not a protected class. Also, any of this is a long process.
The road to proving that it unfairly prejudices Asian Americans is a long road and we should all await judgment by the Supreme Court if it ever takes up the case because SFA will undoubtedly fail to prove the case in Appeals Court. In the meantime, familiarize yourselves with the 'actual' case that will count a whole heckova lot more than where FCPS's AAP program lands on your individual case.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/01/us/harvard-admissions-lawsuit.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/28/magazine/affirmative-action-asian-american-harvard.html?module=inline&login=smartlock&auth=login-smartlock
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To the 22:32 PP:
How can you justify the teachers’ and committee members decisions when so many kids who were accepted to AAP aren’t getting pass advanced (sometimes aren’t even passing) SOLs and are massively bombing the IAAT. Most of the kids in AAP are pretty mediocre and unremarkable in every way.
Then make AAP the default, have a remdial class, and a GT class for the kids who are off the charts smart.
Anonymous wrote:Oh FFS: Save your school system and stop with the lawyers. IDEA does not cover GT. Doing this legal sht just makes the system waste money and only the JDs win. Stop it. And it doesn't matter. If your kid is GT, they will win in the end unless you ruin them by telling them that they are special and don't need to work for accomplishments.
Anonymous wrote:To the 22:32 PP:
How can you justify the teachers’ and committee members decisions when so many kids who were accepted to AAP aren’t getting pass advanced (sometimes aren’t even passing) SOLs and are massively bombing the IAAT. Most of the kids in AAP are pretty mediocre and unremarkable in every way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a white family in my neighborhood that brought a lawyer to the table. Her kid was smart, not nearly that high IQ though.
One meeting with the lawyer and next thing the kid is at the LIV center.
Lawyer up folks. Get your friends together and do it if necessary. Demand transparency and guidelines. This is public school, the public has a say.
Any info on who the lawyer was?
I'm in. Are there any lawyers here who would be willing to get this started?
If people want to get together and pursue this further, I for one, am up for that. But we need to take it off this group and actually take real action. It isn’t even about our individual children, but about clarity in this whole process!
I am a lawyer. But I am not registered in VA. I was given the name of the lawyers that pursued Special Needs rights for FCPS (and how they were/are being restrained.) I may email them and ask if there is some sort of a class suit or quicker action to be taken. If anyone wants to find out, the names I was given was :
Kevin Byrnes
https://fhhfirm.com/kevin-byrnes
Regina Kline
https://www.browngold.com/team/gina-kline
Please keep us posted on their responses. I do think legal action may be the only recourse.
So I did connect with one of the attorneys. They said the problem is that courts or a jury would not view gifted kids as a protected class similar to special ed kids. The immediate judgement would be a bunch of helicopter parents. The only way this would have legs is to say that it unfairly affects a certain ethnicity. For example, if Asian Americans are held to a higher standard and not everyone is viewed objectively despite their race, there is something there. But gifted kids alone is not a protected class. Also, any of this is a long process.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a white family in my neighborhood that brought a lawyer to the table. Her kid was smart, not nearly that high IQ though.
One meeting with the lawyer and next thing the kid is at the LIV center.
Lawyer up folks. Get your friends together and do it if necessary. Demand transparency and guidelines. This is public school, the public has a say.
Any info on who the lawyer was?
I'm in. Are there any lawyers here who would be willing to get this started?
If people want to get together and pursue this further, I for one, am up for that. But we need to take it off this group and actually take real action. It isn’t even about our individual children, but about clarity in this whole process!
I am a lawyer. But I am not registered in VA. I was given the name of the lawyers that pursued Special Needs rights for FCPS (and how they were/are being restrained.) I may email them and ask if there is some sort of a class suit or quicker action to be taken. If anyone wants to find out, the names I was given was :
Kevin Byrnes
https://fhhfirm.com/kevin-byrnes
Regina Kline
https://www.browngold.com/team/gina-kline
Please keep us posted on their responses. I do think legal action may be the only recourse.
Anonymous wrote:
When will the NBA lower the hoop to get more white/asian players?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a white family in my neighborhood that brought a lawyer to the table. Her kid was smart, not nearly that high IQ though.
One meeting with the lawyer and next thing the kid is at the LIV center.
Lawyer up folks. Get your friends together and do it if necessary. Demand transparency and guidelines. This is public school, the public has a say.
Any info on who the lawyer was?
I'm in. Are there any lawyers here who would be willing to get this started?
If people want to get together and pursue this further, I for one, am up for that. But we need to take it off this group and actually take real action. It isn’t even about our individual children, but about clarity in this whole process!
I am a lawyer. But I am not registered in VA. I was given the name of the lawyers that pursued Special Needs rights for FCPS (and how they were/are being restrained.) I may email them and ask if there is some sort of a class suit or quicker action to be taken. If anyone wants to find out, the names I was given was :
Kevin Byrnes
https://fhhfirm.com/kevin-byrnes
Regina Kline
https://www.browngold.com/team/gina-kline