Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, and she has gone on to complain about what a difficult baby little Onyx is, too. I wonder if the older ones will start to worry about the baby being "rehomed".
A lot of moms complain when they have difficult babies....
A lot of moms don’t give their kids away....
He was not a baby. Most moms complain, but you don't complain on video/online where the child and your other kids and their friends and families can hear it all. Imagine what that would do to a child. This kid will go online one day and read all about this. Imagine how that will impact him after all the trauma he's had.
I’m sorry but no, he won’t go online one day and read all this. He has severe special needs and can’t even talk. He will never go and read about himself online.
He may be more there than people realize.
Ehhh, I don’t think so unfortunately. Never heard him talk in any videos on YouTube or IG. He’s four but seems to have the mindset of a 1 year old. I just don’t ever see him being a “normal kid”.
I know several kids including mine who did not talk till after four.
Did they have strokes in the womb and neuro specialists looking at their brain scans advising they would never take this on themselves and that issues would likely be lifelong? Because this child had that. Doesn't justify the parent's actions, but when you have specialists looking at neurological activity and saying, "I wouldn't..." that doesn't bode well normally.
What doctor is going to blab out to the parent of a child that they should give the child away rather than treat the child? It's not even a believable statement, it sounds like an excuse to support their choice to giving him away.
Not giving away a child, but that this was well known prior to adoption and the adoptive parents accepted this risk, against medical advice. And here they are...
They are giving him away. What else do you want to call it? You want to make it sound nice... we're putting him up for adoption? They aren't even doing a legal adoption.
How do you know that? I thought I heard that they used their adoption agency for the placement in the new home, which almost certainly means that it is a legal adoption.
I hope that their legal fees are astronomical and that these two awful people will be forced to spend as much of their waking life as possible working 3 jobs. May caring, nice people surround their children and guide them through life.
The new adoptive family pays the legal fees. They walk away, new family pays everything and its a 5 minute court hearing and done.
They have a lawyer threatening people on social media. Who knows how long they’ll retain him to clean up their mess.
Anonymous wrote:She is complete and utter scum. Some receipts:
https://twitter.com/ParticleSoop/status/1265824835395084288?s=19: Video of her talking about his diagnosis, that the agency discouraged them from adoption, saying it didn't matter the diagnosis, and she received photos/videos of H from his foster mother.
https://twitter.com/thatbonnielass7/status/1265674874862870529 : Screenshots of the posts she made in 2018, AFTER the adoption of H, looking for a new child with "easy" special needs (but that people think are hard, so that they'd get credit for adopting a difficult child)
https://twitter.com/SophRossss/status/1265864237567574016 : Video of her talking about H's therapy being too expensive while waving around a $6k bracelet
https://www.instagram.com/p/CAhOvf8g0tH/ : Video of her mocking her son who is having a "bad day".
Anonymous wrote:For anyone who followed her before all this I have a question. If she gave the child away in January, how has she acted since? Is she all happy go lucky in her stories? I mean did she seem effected at all before everyone found out?
Anonymous wrote:For anyone who followed her before all this I have a question. If she gave the child away in January, how has she acted since? Is she all happy go lucky in her stories? I mean did she seem effected at all before everyone found out?
Anonymous wrote:For anyone who followed her before all this I have a question. If she gave the child away in January, how has she acted since? Is she all happy go lucky in her stories? I mean did she seem effected at all before everyone found out?
Anonymous wrote:Influencers should not be allowed to adopt. Their lives revolve around creating content for views, sponsors, and subscribers / followers. They are always looking for new storylines, and people stories draw viewers. Adopting a kid as content is a terrible idea and I am not surprised it went wrong so fast. They have probably maxed out the views and sponsors they can her from the adoption story line and now they would have to actually raise the child.
Personally I think all these family channels should be banned. When your livelihood and I come depends on your kids performing on camera and on being filmed as props and producst, kids lose out. They lose privacy, they lose a spontaneous life, they lose all kinds of things. People exploiting their children, their children's lives, and their children's emotions and privacy for money should be stopped.
Anonymous wrote:I like how she wore glasses in the video so the viewer would know it was serious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Violent and aggressive? Wasn't he just 3?
Lots of toddlers are 'violent and aggressive'. Especially when they struggle with communication and sensory issues.
We aren't talking an angry 13 year old beating people up.
He’s 5.
He is turning 5. They should him having a meltdown, and it looked no different than any other 4 year old meltdown but he didn't speak english coming here, had no sign language and they had unrealistic expectations. She was downright mean to him in the video given his needs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, and she has gone on to complain about what a difficult baby little Onyx is, too. I wonder if the older ones will start to worry about the baby being "rehomed".
A lot of moms complain when they have difficult babies....
A lot of moms don’t give their kids away....
He was not a baby. Most moms complain, but you don't complain on video/online where the child and your other kids and their friends and families can hear it all. Imagine what that would do to a child. This kid will go online one day and read all about this. Imagine how that will impact him after all the trauma he's had.
I’m sorry but no, he won’t go online one day and read all this. He has severe special needs and can’t even talk. He will never go and read about himself online.
He may be more there than people realize.
Ehhh, I don’t think so unfortunately. Never heard him talk in any videos on YouTube or IG. He’s four but seems to have the mindset of a 1 year old. I just don’t ever see him being a “normal kid”.
I know several kids including mine who did not talk till after four.
Did they have strokes in the womb and neuro specialists looking at their brain scans advising they would never take this on themselves and that issues would likely be lifelong? Because this child had that. Doesn't justify the parent's actions, but when you have specialists looking at neurological activity and saying, "I wouldn't..." that doesn't bode well normally.
What doctor is going to blab out to the parent of a child that they should give the child away rather than treat the child? It's not even a believable statement, it sounds like an excuse to support their choice to giving him away.
Not giving away a child, but that this was well known prior to adoption and the adoptive parents accepted this risk, against medical advice. And here they are...
They are giving him away. What else do you want to call it? You want to make it sound nice... we're putting him up for adoption? They aren't even doing a legal adoption.
How do you know that? I thought I heard that they used their adoption agency for the placement in the new home, which almost certainly means that it is a legal adoption.
I hope that their legal fees are astronomical and that these two awful people will be forced to spend as much of their waking life as possible working 3 jobs. May caring, nice people surround their children and guide them through life.
The new adoptive family pays the legal fees. They walk away, new family pays everything and its a 5 minute court hearing and done.
They have a lawyer threatening people on social media. Who knows how long they’ll retain him to clean up their mess.
Lmao no they don’t. He “threatened” one crazy person who made a whole IG to post about the family. Try again.
You confirmed the claim, so no need to try again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, and she has gone on to complain about what a difficult baby little Onyx is, too. I wonder if the older ones will start to worry about the baby being "rehomed".
A lot of moms complain when they have difficult babies....
A lot of moms don’t give their kids away....
He was not a baby. Most moms complain, but you don't complain on video/online where the child and your other kids and their friends and families can hear it all. Imagine what that would do to a child. This kid will go online one day and read all about this. Imagine how that will impact him after all the trauma he's had.
I’m sorry but no, he won’t go online one day and read all this. He has severe special needs and can’t even talk. He will never go and read about himself online.
He may be more there than people realize.
Ehhh, I don’t think so unfortunately. Never heard him talk in any videos on YouTube or IG. He’s four but seems to have the mindset of a 1 year old. I just don’t ever see him being a “normal kid”.
I know several kids including mine who did not talk till after four.
Did they have strokes in the womb and neuro specialists looking at their brain scans advising they would never take this on themselves and that issues would likely be lifelong? Because this child had that. Doesn't justify the parent's actions, but when you have specialists looking at neurological activity and saying, "I wouldn't..." that doesn't bode well normally.
What doctor is going to blab out to the parent of a child that they should give the child away rather than treat the child? It's not even a believable statement, it sounds like an excuse to support their choice to giving him away.
Not giving away a child, but that this was well known prior to adoption and the adoptive parents accepted this risk, against medical advice. And here they are...
They are giving him away. What else do you want to call it? You want to make it sound nice... we're putting him up for adoption? They aren't even doing a legal adoption.
How do you know that? I thought I heard that they used their adoption agency for the placement in the new home, which almost certainly means that it is a legal adoption.
I hope that their legal fees are astronomical and that these two awful people will be forced to spend as much of their waking life as possible working 3 jobs. May caring, nice people surround their children and guide them through life.
The new adoptive family pays the legal fees. They walk away, new family pays everything and its a 5 minute court hearing and done.
They have a lawyer threatening people on social media. Who knows how long they’ll retain him to clean up their mess.
Lmao no they don’t. He “threatened” one crazy person who made a whole IG to post about the family. Try again.