Anonymous wrote:Didn't miss any part of the story. She threatened him by calling the cops and acting like he was going to rape her. Also note that she was using his skin color as a way to emphasize the importance of the police coming to help her. She also nearly strangled her dog. But what you are missing is that he also bears some blame, was threatening her, illegally videotaped her, then tried to destroy her by posting it on Facebook.
You are very wrong. He was not threatening her; he asked her to stop acting illegally. She refused, so he was going to offer a treat to show her that she did not have control of her dog. He was not illegally recording her as it is not illegal to record someone in public. The recording restrictions only occur in private and where the person has an expectation of privacy, neither of which is true in this case. He did not try to destroy her, he wanted to publicly shame her as a dog owner who flaunts the rules. That was his entire case. It was her own actions, her slanderous accusations of him threatening and attacking both her and her dog that destroyed her. You are a classic victim-blaming apologist.
He does not bear any blame. She had so many opportunities to avoid losing her dog, career and reputation and took none of them.