Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maret kids need a practice. Outrageous— my parents pay taxes just like others so it’s reasonable to get field space—- just like any other school!!!!
You and all your exclamation points are ridiculous. Go away. The adults are talking.
You can have field access equal to what Hardy gets. Fair?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maret kids need a practice. Outrageous— my parents pay taxes just like others so it’s reasonable to get field space—- just like any other school!!!!
You and all your exclamation points are ridiculous. Go away. The adults are talking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone provide the following:
1) Total $ spent by DC on Jelleff fields by year
2) Total $ Spent by Maret on Jelleff fields by year
3) Key excerpts from any written agreements between DC and Maret
4) Actual use of the field by Maret by day (2018, 2019)
#3 & #4 has already been provided in this thread, in the 2010 agreement.
Anonymous wrote:Maret kids need a practice. Outrageous— my parents pay taxes just like others so it’s reasonable to get field space—- just like any other school!!!!
Anonymous wrote:Diploma from GDS. BA from Harvard. At the post for 10 years. And that's the best she can do after Deadspin did all the work for her? She's been thoroughly out-journoed by a bunch of anons on DCUM. You don’t really appreciate how crap the media is until you see their work up close.
Anonymous wrote:Can someone provide the following:
1) Total $ spent by DC on Jelleff fields by year
2) Total $ Spent by Maret on Jelleff fields by year
3) Key excerpts from any written agreements between DC and Maret
4) Actual use of the field by Maret by day (2018, 2019)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Folks understand that the powers favoring this agreement are not just Maret families but the families/administration at any of the other private schools who play Maret on the Jelleff field.
And note that there are powerful families at play here. Maret's board chair is married to ex-National Security Advisor Susan Rice, for instance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No dog in this fight, but I’ve coached baseball in many different schools in DC. Jelleff was owned by the boys and girls club, the city bought the building and field in '08 or '09. There city didn't begin maintaining the building until then. The field was built, turfed, and maintained by Maret during the fall/spring according to the lease since then. The reason it's a 10-year lease is that 10 years is the lifecycle of the turf on the field. Maret uses the field until 6pm (unless there is a game being played, and Maret has earlier game start times than other teams in the league) Monday-Friday, 3 or 4 Saturdays a season. The British School uses the field during the weekdays until 330 pm on weekdays when the field is generally unused. The reason for this setup is to accommodate as many groups as possible including Stoddard, and Break-Out Lacrosse.
Furthermore, as someone who has extensive history with DPR's inability to maintain outdoor athletic facilities I know the city won't actually maintain the field space. I've spent countless hours prepping and maintaining public baseball fields like Banneker/Maury Wills, Ft. Reno, Friendship, Guy Mason, Hamilton (before it was turf) and Taft field. Every time the city loses one of it's public/private partnerships the facilities, and the children that year them, suffer. A recent and local example is the conditions that have deteriorated at Guy Mason since Georgetown Softball left.
If it were transferred to DCPS, then DGS would provide the maintenance. Not great, but perhaps better than DPR.
In any event, for after-school sports teams, a poorly maintained field is better than no field.
Have you seen Lafayette field since the renovation? Ha!
Maintenance of Palisades rec turf field has been fine.
Anonymous wrote:Seems reasonable for Maret to at least try to renew the lease; it's been ten years and this is the first stink that's been made of it. Exclusive use may be unreasonable at this point, but to say they cant use it at all without a plan for maintaining it is hypocritical.