Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The cop doesn’t have to have lasting injuries.
They just have to prove the attack affected his thinking in the moment.
Affected his thinking enough to use deadly force on three civilians? Is he going to plea temporary insanity?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The cop doesn’t have to have lasting injuries.
They just have to prove the attack affected his thinking in the moment.
I’m pretty sure that’s not the standard.
Anonymous wrote:Aren’t police officers supposed to identify themselves and then order people to stop or they will shoot, especially when there is no other weapon present? Rather than identify themselves and then promptly fire off shots? The latter gives one no time to back away it or otherwise de-escalate the situation.
Anonymous wrote:The cop doesn’t have to have lasting injuries.
They just have to prove the attack affected his thinking in the moment.
Anonymous wrote:The cop doesn’t have to have lasting injuries.
They just have to prove the attack affected his thinking in the moment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How can there be two different stories if they have video?
Because lawyers. What any lawyer is saying right now is probably not the truth/fact.
Anonymous wrote:How can there be two different stories if they have video?