Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know the house, but I'm not posting it. It is still unclear whether the parents were even home at the time. Adult present may not mean parents, FWIW.
Was it in Stonebridge?
Anonymous wrote:I know the house, but I'm not posting it. It is still unclear whether the parents were even home at the time. Adult present may not mean parents, FWIW.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all need an education in criminal law. I'm certain you'll want to afford yourself its protections when your teen, spouse, parent, friend, etc., finds themselves in need.
Did you hear about the police captain who reported his criminal son in Massachusetts? No, not everyone is corrupt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all need an education in criminal law. I'm certain you'll want to afford yourself its protections when your teen, spouse, parent, friend, etc., finds themselves in need.
Did you hear about the police captain who reported his criminal son in Massachusetts? No, not everyone is corrupt.
Anonymous wrote:You all need an education in criminal law. I'm certain you'll want to afford yourself its protections when your teen, spouse, parent, friend, etc., finds themselves in need.
Anonymous wrote:You all need an education in criminal law. I'm certain you'll want to afford yourself its protections when your teen, spouse, parent, friend, etc., finds themselves in need.
Anonymous wrote:The police already reported there was at least one adult there. Too late to hide that at this point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know the house, but I'm not posting it. It is still unclear whether the parents were even home at the time. Adult present may not mean parents, FWIW.
There's nothing unclear. If they can't/won't say they weren't home, or knew nothing of the underaged drinkers on their property, you don't want to incriminate yourself, do you? That's very clear to some people.
Anonymous wrote:I know the house, but I'm not posting it. It is still unclear whether the parents were even home at the time. Adult present may not mean parents, FWIW.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I find it awful that the 18yr olds name is plastered everywhere but the parents of the house who hosted the party is not. Why are they being protected? THEY are the ones at fault here. The 18yr old yes, we know he is guilty but the fact that parents not only hosted an under-age party but did not have keys to all these kids cars is brutal. If my child died in all of this, I would be more upset at them then the driver.
Why don't you start and plaster the name of the host parents on this forum? The name of the driver is a matter of public record. The names of the host parents are not but nothing stops you from informing us who they are.
Yes, please do and give us the address. I certainly think the name should be published.