Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are nitpicking here. An adult can easily understand what is expected for this standard.
And, the developers couldn't even go to the trouble of proofreading these "standards." Sorry, if they couldn't proofread them, what other steps did they skip?
I'm new to MCPS. I only know 2.0. So, educate me. Were the MCPS standards before 2.0 written with no ambiguity, no grammatical errors? Do you have a link to those standards?
It's hard to find the old Maryland Voluntary Curriculum Standards.
I found a link to the old language arts curriculum. Here are the former Kindergarten standards in the state of MD :
http://www1.pgcps.org/uploadedFiles/Offices/Academics/Reading_English_Language_Arts/Kindergarten_RELA_VSC_(Regular_CFPG).pdf
Listening:
• Follow a set of two-or-three step directions.
• Listen to, read, and discuss nursery rhymes.
• Comprehend and analyze what is heard.
• Speaks clearly enough to be heard and understood in a variety of setting.
• Listen to and discuss variety of texts representing diverse cultures, authorship, perspective, and ethnicities.
• Name picture of common concepts.
• Acquire new vocabulary through listening to and reading a variety of text on a daily basis.
• Read a minimum of 25 books per quarter, both literary and informational.
Speaking:
• Understand that speech can be written or read
• Respond to questions and verify answers using illustration/text.
• Speaks clearly enough to be heard and understood in a variety of setting.
• Read and recognize sight words.
• Use knowledge of end punctuation to signal expression in reading.
• Recite nursery rhyme, poemsn and finger plays with expression.
• Read orally from familiar texts at an appropriate rate.
• Retell story using text as support.
• Respond to text by drawing, speaking, dramatizing, or writing.
• Name picture of common concepts.
Concepts About Print:
• Track print from left to right and top to bottom.
• Make a return sweep to the next line of the text.
• Match oral words to printed words.
• Differentiate numerals, letters, and words
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP have you read this?
http://www.cehd.umn.edu/NCEO/onlinepubs/Synthesis89/SynthesisReport89.pdf
The push to get all special education students to pass the grade level tests (PARCC, VA SOLs etc) isn't due to Common Core. It's due to this waiver they are talking about in this report. I don't understand what was behind this waiver -- states applied for a waiver a few years ago, by agreeing to do away with alternative assessments for more Special Ed kids by the year 2014-2015.
The waiver is from the nonsensical NCLB requirement that all children be at grade level by this year. The asshats who passed it in Congress knew it would never actually happen, but they THOUGHT they'd fix it. Instead, the Congress got so dysfunctional they can't even keep the government running much less fix a complicated bill.
So the Feds, led by the jerk of all jerks Arne Duncan, are now using the waiver to get the states to crawl and beg to whatever horrid thing they want -- in this case, the abuse of special education students.
Anonymous wrote:
I'm spreading THE TRUTH. And that little pamphlet pretty much says exactly what the NEWS STORY from THE WASHINGTON POST says.
All those "accommodations" won't mean a goddamned thing to kids who don't speak English sitting for a test most English speakers aren't going to pass.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Actually, 70 percent of children will not pass the PARCC. That has already been stated by the two testing companies. So, some of the parent snobs on this board will also find out that their precious little Larla is totally screwed.
Could you please provide a reference to the PARCC and Smarter Balanced people saying that 70% of students will not pass the PARCC?
Also, in what way is Larla screwed if she does not pass the PARCC? How will Larla's test scores on the tests required by NCLB affect Larla personally?
Larla won't graduate from high school. In most states, those tests are going to be used to say whether or not kids graduate. In many states, the kids won't get past third grade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Here's one of the accommodations the PARCC dumb asses suggested:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2014/11/25/a-damning-account-of-one-states-common-core-testing-initiative/
Bavis told the board members at the September meeting that districts will comply with the law and administer the PARCC as demanded but that the state did not give districts enough lead time to make testing schedules and set up accommodations for English Language Learners and students with special needs. He said he had attended a meeting about a week earlier at which state officials described approved accommodations for English Language Learners: “I was told that one of the ELL English Language Learner accommodations approved by the state and PARCC is to read the directions slowly, in English, and at a higher volume. That’s awful as an accommodation. … It’s insulting.”
But yeah, go ahead and turn your kids' futures over to Pearson.
That's nonsense. Please stop spreading misinformation.
There are detailed accommodations available for students learning English as a Second Language on the PARCC. Many of the accommodations are actually available to all students. Some are just available to ELL students. The accommodations have been known for quite some time.
Here's a pamphlet summarizing all the accommodations
http://www.parcconline.org/sites/parcc/files/Teacher%20PARCC%20Brochure%20for%20English%20Learners.pdf
"Read the directions slowly, in English, and at a higher volume" is NOT one of the accommodations listed.
You may read the directions aloud (this is allowed for all students), and you may translate them into the student's native language.
I'm spreading THE TRUTH. And that little pamphlet pretty much says exactly what the NEWS STORY from THE WASHINGTON POST says.
All those "accommodations" won't mean a goddamned thing to kids who don't speak English sitting for a test most English speakers aren't going to pass.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Actually, 70 percent of children will not pass the PARCC. That has already been stated by the two testing companies. So, some of the parent snobs on this board will also find out that their precious little Larla is totally screwed.
Could you please provide a reference to the PARCC and Smarter Balanced people saying that 70% of students will not pass the PARCC?
Also, in what way is Larla screwed if she does not pass the PARCC? How will Larla's test scores on the tests required by NCLB affect Larla personally?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Here's one of the accommodations the PARCC dumb asses suggested:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2014/11/25/a-damning-account-of-one-states-common-core-testing-initiative/
Bavis told the board members at the September meeting that districts will comply with the law and administer the PARCC as demanded but that the state did not give districts enough lead time to make testing schedules and set up accommodations for English Language Learners and students with special needs. He said he had attended a meeting about a week earlier at which state officials described approved accommodations for English Language Learners: “I was told that one of the ELL English Language Learner accommodations approved by the state and PARCC is to read the directions slowly, in English, and at a higher volume. That’s awful as an accommodation. … It’s insulting.”
But yeah, go ahead and turn your kids' futures over to Pearson.
That's nonsense. Please stop spreading misinformation.
There are detailed accommodations available for students learning English as a Second Language on the PARCC. Many of the accommodations are actually available to all students. Some are just available to ELL students. The accommodations have been known for quite some time.
Here's a pamphlet summarizing all the accommodations
http://www.parcconline.org/sites/parcc/files/Teacher%20PARCC%20Brochure%20for%20English%20Learners.pdf
"Read the directions slowly, in English, and at a higher volume" is NOT one of the accommodations listed.
You may read the directions aloud (this is allowed for all students), and you may translate them into the student's native language.
Anonymous wrote:OP have you read this?
http://www.cehd.umn.edu/NCEO/onlinepubs/Synthesis89/SynthesisReport89.pdf
The push to get all special education students to pass the grade level tests (PARCC, VA SOLs etc) isn't due to Common Core. It's due to this waiver they are talking about in this report. I don't understand what was behind this waiver -- states applied for a waiver a few years ago, by agreeing to do away with alternative assessments for more Special Ed kids by the year 2014-2015.
Anonymous wrote:
Here's one of the accommodations the PARCC dumb asses suggested:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2014/11/25/a-damning-account-of-one-states-common-core-testing-initiative/
Bavis told the board members at the September meeting that districts will comply with the law and administer the PARCC as demanded but that the state did not give districts enough lead time to make testing schedules and set up accommodations for English Language Learners and students with special needs. He said he had attended a meeting about a week earlier at which state officials described approved accommodations for English Language Learners: “I was told that one of the ELL English Language Learner accommodations approved by the state and PARCC is to read the directions slowly, in English, and at a higher volume. That’s awful as an accommodation. … It’s insulting.”
But yeah, go ahead and turn your kids' futures over to Pearson.
Anonymous wrote:"numbers" was used for "numerals" -- that is one problem.