Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't high processing speed exactly what a child needs to keep up in an advanced classroom?
No

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pattern is...if you want in, appeal, and they'll let you in.
Having read these threads for three years now, I firmly believe the number one determinant of acceptance into AAP is how hard the parent wants to push for it.
Strange how those who push also qualify.
On the contrary, those who qualify, push.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pattern is...if you want in, appeal, and they'll let you in.
Having read these threads for three years now, I firmly believe the number one determinant of acceptance into AAP is how hard the parent wants to push for it.
Strange how those who push also qualify.
Anonymous wrote:Plenty of kids with IQs over 130 doing fine in their base schools. To me, it's hard to make the argument that crossing that threshold should entitle anyone to go to AAP. But then again, I think the centers are pretty much reverse busing that no one complains about because their kids get something out of it, screw the folks who can't afford it. The sooner FCPS closes this loophole -- whether by making more schools LLIV or making it an even playing field for anyone who wants to appeal to get WISC testing, the better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pattern is...if you want in, appeal, and they'll let you in.
Having read these threads for three years now, I firmly believe the number one determinant of acceptance into AAP is how hard the parent wants to push for it.
Anonymous wrote:Isn't high processing speed exactly what a child needs to keep up in an advanced classroom?
Anonymous wrote:PP, I have to disagree. My DC scored a 119 on the WISC, but scored very superior in the PRI and VCI sub categories. I wasn't going to appeal but a poster on another thread suggested that I appeal, as FCPS is beginning to recognize 2E kids. FWIW - an extremely low processing speed brought down the FSIQ, w/o the low processing, the score was well above 132. DC has an obvious processing issue - more than likely
ADD-inattentive. DC is very bright, almost all 4s, except for organization ; a 3. DC had the scores on the NNAT and GBRS were above 10. I did appeal and DC got in.
To other DCUMs, I would suggest that you appeal if you, in your heart, believe that your DC would be successful in AAP. Our Wisc administrator advised against appealing, and we almost didn't appeal. If it weren't for another DCUMer, I wouldn't have appealed. So glad I listened to the DCUMer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pattern is...if you want in, appeal, and they'll let you in.
Having read these threads for three years now, I firmly believe the number one determinant of acceptance into AAP is how hard the parent wants to push for it.
This sounds right. It looks like 100% in on appeal--can that be right? Or, are we just see cases where 120s+ and ok GBRS, e.g., others aren't appealing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pattern is...if you want in, appeal, and they'll let you in.
Having read these threads for three years now, I firmly believe the number one determinant of acceptance into AAP is how hard the parent wants to push for it.