Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ My kids are really little, so we'll see where Basis is once it has an entire high school. But I know that if the school population is more than around one-quarter low SES AA kids, my spouse won't be interested, no matter what the story is academically. This is because, growing up as a low SES Asian kid in largely low SES AA schools, he was called chink almost every school day, with the standard corner-of-eyes pulling gesture, and worse. After his parents complained, the taunting intensified. I can try to reason with him, tell him the school system has implemented the sort of conflict intervention program you mention, but he won't believe that his own children won't be similarly tortured.
As for lowering standards, how else can middle schools reliant on city funding attract much AA talent in one of the country's lowest-performing school systems? Even Detroit and New Orleans do GT screening and support programs. The most academic low SES kids still tend to get scooped up by privates in this city. You watch, Basis will prep them in MS and lose them for HS to scholarships.
I'm glad that social issues are finally being raised on this thread. Thanks, pps.
I agree. This happens now. I talk to parents who have high school age kids at our very sought after charter. Many of the older sibs of lower SES minority kids go to private schools including some very prestigious New England boarding schools on scholarship.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^18:25: It's a big mistake to discount environment.
18:25 here: That's precisely what I wrote. Those who claim parents (="nurture") are the deciding force, they discount the environment. And if you claim environment is key, then school is where that environment "happens". Today's children of all socioeconomic backgrounds spend more waking hours in school or other organized activities than out on the street making friends. If environment counts ==> school counts. The problem is that schools do not own up to that responsibility, especially not if those who may need a more profound exposure to social realities and connections are lectured to or bent over homework sheets from dawn to dusk instead of building skills and practicing critical judgement.
Anonymous wrote:^^ My kids are really little, so we'll see where Basis is once it has an entire high school. But I know that if the school population is more than around one-quarter low SES AA kids, my spouse won't be interested, no matter what the story is academically. This is because, growing up as a low SES Asian kid in largely low SES AA schools, he was called chink almost every school day, with the standard corner-of-eyes pulling gesture, and worse. After his parents complained, the taunting intensified. I can try to reason with him, tell him the school system has implemented the sort of conflict intervention program you mention, but he won't believe that his own children won't be similarly tortured.
As for lowering standards, how else can middle schools reliant on city funding attract much AA talent in one of the country's lowest-performing school systems? Even Detroit and New Orleans do GT screening and support programs. The most academic low SES kids still tend to get scooped up by privates in this city. You watch, Basis will prep them in MS and lose them for HS to scholarships.
I'm glad that social issues are finally being raised on this thread. Thanks, pps.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is that schools do not own up to that responsibility, especially not if those who may need a more profound exposure to social realities and connections are lectured to or bent over homework sheets from dawn to dusk instead of building skills and practicing critical judgement.
Anonymous wrote:^18:25: It's a big mistake to discount environment.
Anonymous wrote:I would love it if we have made it to the point where racism can just be called what it is when it's black on white, which is not uncommon in DC proper. These kids learned it from their parents like the bad way things have existed among certain white families, when we are allowed to just call it "racist".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A different 5th grade parent here. We, and DC, are very happy so far. We would love to be able to stay through 12th grade, both because we don't want DC to be in a ritzy private nor a weak or wild public.
The things that will make us leave? DC being crushed by workload (don't want basis to water this down, but will not put a life preserver on DC if it's really too much for DC personally) and discipline problems. I don't care whether the school is majority AA, so long as the students are there to learn and reverse racism, bullying, fighting, cheating (our last school was DCPS, can you tell?) are nipped in the bud and the chronic troublemakers are thrown out.
Just reverse racism? So it would bother you to be in a school that racist?
Anonymous wrote:We're in 5th, high SES AA. I'd like to see a well-researched report on why at least three-quarters of high SES DCPS and DC Charter families in NW currently leave before high school graduation. Are there any?
I am with pps who strongly suspect that academic concerns are not the whole story. If they were, Banneker, not a bad high school, wouldn't remain almost entirely AA.
We don't want our kid around groups of teens who don't speak grammatically, are disrespectual to adults, have sex, wear sloppy clothes and scary hair, visit parents in prison and so forth, even if they can handle calc at Basis. Do you? A few sure, but not a pack.
This no matter what their SES is!
Anonymous wrote:The sad reality is that a good many of the low SES kids who can indeed "do the work" won't have the time as teens. Their cash-strapped families will rely on them to work part-time jobs as much as 30 hours per week to earn money to cover bare essentials, babysit a lot for children in the extended family, do most of the housework, shopping etc. Moreover, they are unlikely to have quiet, well-lit places to study at home, or the sense of well-being, to focus.