Anonymous
Post 03/21/2012 20:35     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We're sorry. At no time was this thread intended to mock or demean the refined and highly developed sensibilities of the people of California. Rather, we comment on the bodaciousness of the male and female landscape (discreetly and anonymously, of course) at some local public schools. Do you not find our toe shoe man hot? Are you dead inside?[/quote]

I would never comment on someone else's spouse. Never. I would hope that others are not commenting on my spouse who does wear similar shoes. Got it?[/quote]

If people comment on anyone, toe shoe or no toe shoe, this person is either someone's spouse, or Dad, or brother, or uncle, or nephew. Why does being someone's spouse shield him from being commented on? So we can't comment on anyone???
Anonymous
Post 03/21/2012 15:22     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney

This thread was so good. And then it was spoiled by hyenas.
Anonymous
Post 03/21/2012 15:14     Subject: Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They're all dawgs!!! Just want sniff crotches and hump anything that's moving. I just had slap a Janney's dad on the nose with newspaper.


Can't really blame them, have you seen their wives? Woof!


^^Annoying, self-hating ankle biter is back for more punishment. Sense of humor still non-extant.
Anonymous
Post 03/21/2012 14:56     Subject: Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney

Anonymous wrote:They're all dawgs!!! Just want sniff crotches and hump anything that's moving. I just had slap a Janney's dad on the nose with newspaper.


Can't really blame them, have you seen their wives? Woof!
Anonymous
Post 03/21/2012 14:53     Subject: Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney

They're all dawgs!!! Just want sniff crotches and hump anything that's moving. I just had slap a Janney's dad on the nose with newspaper.
Anonymous
Post 03/21/2012 11:40     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney

Wait, could this be Sassafras??

Anonymous wrote:
I'm not sad about the thread.
Anonymous
Post 03/21/2012 11:06     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The sad things for Janney is that whenever someone comes to this website to find out about Janney, they will run a search for "Janney" and this disgusting thread will come up. Perhaps this was a plot by some Janney families to discourage people from moving in-boundary because no one will want to associate with Janney parents who are judging their looks or looking at their spouses. Very sad for Janney.


In fact, despite our "sadness," so many families want to send their kids to Janney that the just-opened expanded and modernized building is already overcapacity. So yes, please feel free not to move in bounds, because the only alternative if growth continues would be to redistrict, and that means that some families who want to come here won't be able to do so. Your decision to go elsewhere means that we can welcome some family with a sense of humor who would otherwise be excluded.

Buh-bye.


We already live in-boundary to Janney! -This is why this thread upsets me.


Don't worry. Most of this thread seems to have been written by less than ten people: "Frumpy/Hag NameCaller", "Angry ex-Californian", "Hottie Noticer", "Detachable Obsessive", "On a High Horse", "80's Music Lover", "Republican Snake", "Shoe Commentator", and "Sad about the Thread".


All of these can be one woman with multiple personalities!
Anonymous
Post 03/21/2012 09:36     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney


I'm not sad about the thread.
Anonymous
Post 03/21/2012 09:06     Subject: Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney

Image, it is all about one's image.
Anonymous
Post 03/20/2012 21:43     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The sad things for Janney is that whenever someone comes to this website to find out about Janney, they will run a search for "Janney" and this disgusting thread will come up. Perhaps this was a plot by some Janney families to discourage people from moving in-boundary because no one will want to associate with Janney parents who are judging their looks or looking at their spouses. Very sad for Janney.


In fact, despite our "sadness," so many families want to send their kids to Janney that the just-opened expanded and modernized building is already overcapacity. So yes, please feel free not to move in bounds, because the only alternative if growth continues would be to redistrict, and that means that some families who want to come here won't be able to do so. Your decision to go elsewhere means that we can welcome some family with a sense of humor who would otherwise be excluded.

Buh-bye.


We already live in-boundary to Janney! -This is why this thread upsets me.


Don't worry. Most of this thread seems to have been written by less than ten people: "Frumpy/Hag NameCaller", "Angry ex-Californian", "Hottie Noticer", "Detachable Obsessive", "On a High Horse", "80's Music Lover", "Republican Snake", "Shoe Commentator", and "Sad about the Thread".


Whoosh!
Anonymous
Post 03/20/2012 20:28     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The sad things for Janney is that whenever someone comes to this website to find out about Janney, they will run a search for "Janney" and this disgusting thread will come up. Perhaps this was a plot by some Janney families to discourage people from moving in-boundary because no one will want to associate with Janney parents who are judging their looks or looking at their spouses. Very sad for Janney.


In fact, despite our "sadness," so many families want to send their kids to Janney that the just-opened expanded and modernized building is already overcapacity. So yes, please feel free not to move in bounds, because the only alternative if growth continues would be to redistrict, and that means that some families who want to come here won't be able to do so. Your decision to go elsewhere means that we can welcome some family with a sense of humor who would otherwise be excluded.

Buh-bye.


We already live in-boundary to Janney! -This is why this thread upsets me.


Don't worry. Most of this thread seems to have been written by less than ten people: "Frumpy/Hag NameCaller", "Angry ex-Californian", "Hottie Noticer", "Detachable Obsessive", "On a High Horse", "80's Music Lover", "Republican Snake", "Shoe Commentator", and "Sad about the Thread".
Anonymous
Post 03/20/2012 16:08     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The sad things for Janney is that whenever someone comes to this website to find out about Janney, they will run a search for "Janney" and this disgusting thread will come up. Perhaps this was a plot by some Janney families to discourage people from moving in-boundary because no one will want to associate with Janney parents who are judging their looks or looking at their spouses. Very sad for Janney.


In fact, despite our "sadness," so many families want to send their kids to Janney that the just-opened expanded and modernized building is already overcapacity. So yes, please feel free not to move in bounds, because the only alternative if growth continues would be to redistrict, and that means that some families who want to come here won't be able to do so. Your decision to go elsewhere means that we can welcome some family with a sense of humor who would otherwise be excluded.

Buh-bye.


We already live in-boundary to Janney! -This is why this thread upsets me.
Anonymous
Post 03/20/2012 16:03     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney

Anonymous wrote:The sad things for Janney is that whenever someone comes to this website to find out about Janney, they will run a search for "Janney" and this disgusting thread will come up. Perhaps this was a plot by some Janney families to discourage people from moving in-boundary because no one will want to associate with Janney parents who are judging their looks or looking at their spouses. Very sad for Janney.


In fact, despite our "sadness," so many families want to send their kids to Janney that the just-opened expanded and modernized building is already overcapacity. So yes, please feel free not to move in bounds, because the only alternative if growth continues would be to redistrict, and that means that some families who want to come here won't be able to do so. Your decision to go elsewhere means that we can welcome some family with a sense of humor who would otherwise be excluded.

Buh-bye.
Anonymous
Post 03/20/2012 16:00     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We're sorry. At no time was this thread intended to mock or demean the refined and highly developed sensibilities of the people of California. Rather, we comment on the bodaciousness of the male and female landscape (discreetly and anonymously, of course) at some local public schools. Do you not find our toe shoe man hot? Are you dead inside?


I would never comment on someone else's spouse. Never. I would hope that others are not commenting on my spouse who does wear similar shoes. Got it?


Is this California girl? I mean, I wish they all could be California girls, but if it is, yes, it's your spouse we are commenting on. Surprised? You already acknowledged the men are hot in CA. What did you expect?
Anonymous
Post 03/20/2012 15:38     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We're sorry. At no time was this thread intended to mock or demean the refined and highly developed sensibilities of the people of California. Rather, we comment on the bodaciousness of the male and female landscape (discreetly and anonymously, of course) at some local public schools. Do you not find our toe shoe man hot? Are you dead inside?


I would never comment on someone else's spouse. Never. I would hope that others are not commenting on my spouse who does wear similar shoes. Got it?


Woah. Lots of guys wear the shoes. It's like fleece at Janney. It's practically a uniform. Calm down. Have a skinny chai.