Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3miz2ahe4es2n

JD Vance: "I think this comes from a legitimate misunderstanding. I think the Iranians thought the ceasefire included Lebanon, and it just didn't. We never made that promise, we never indicated that was gonna be the case."

Lebanon was literally in the 10 point plan that the US agreed to. It is hard to understand if they are stupid, if they think we are stupid, if that are just that callous, or all of the above.

The US isn't bombing Lebanon. Israel is. Seems to me that Iran needs to be prosecuting a deal with Israel.

Just so we are clear: you are saying we should leave Israel high and dry?

Israel has repeatedly tried to sabotage any effort at peace. How many times have they assasinated negotiators in the midst of negotiations? 3 or 4?

They knew what the terms were and willfully violated them. Their continued blood lust is harming us. They're more instransigent and expansionist than Iran is. Let that sink in.

Do you have a better idea?

Israel also didn’t have a problem with this same Iranian government back in the 1980s when they and some republicans in the Reagan admin helped arm Iran illegally via Iran contra.

At the time, Israel considered Saddam the biggest threat and Saddam was secular not an Islamic government. Whoever is a charismatic leader with friendships in the West and championing Palestinian rights is a threat to Israel. Gamal Abdel Nasswr was a secular president of Egypt in the 1960s and switched from USSR to pro America right before the 1967 USS liberty attack where Israel pretended to be Egypt and attacked a US ship.

We need to sanction Israel. This idea that they give a shit about religious regimes and liberalizing people is Bs because they hated the secular governments too (Egypt, Iraq, Libya). In fact, the only ones they like are the real regimes like Saudi Arabia, Jordan, UAE, Kuwait. They don’t hold any elections or even have presidents like Iran. They have fake kingdoms that are held up by Us, Israel, Uk.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why Republicans want this war with Iran. There was a perfectly good deal under Obama that constrained Iran's nuclear program and kept the Strait of Hormuz open for everyone. Every war plan and gaming exercise started with the assumption that Iran would seize control of Hormuz and take control of 20 percent of the world's oil and gas. That's rudimentary geopolitics. So why start a war at all when the US already had everything they wanted under Obama - free passage and no nukes for Iran. And now there is zero change Iran is going to give up control of Hormuz and abstain from pursuing nuclear weapons.

So what was the point? The US - and the world - is the huge strategic loser here. Are Republicans just dumbasses? Are Republicans all servile to Israel, which wants chaos in the Middle East? For America's interests, this may be the dumbest war in modern history.

Bibi has been lobbying American presidents since Clinton to attack Iran saying they will have nuclear weapons in few years.
He convinced Trump if we drop huge amounts and fast the government will collapse and you will be a hero.
Trump thinking it would be like Venezuela
went for it without plan B.
So here we are.

It is like Venezuela! Trump did some stupid stuff and the country kept going.

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3miz2ahe4es2n

JD Vance: "I think this comes from a legitimate misunderstanding. I think the Iranians thought the ceasefire included Lebanon, and it just didn't. We never made that promise, we never indicated that was gonna be the case."

Lebanon was literally in the 10 point plan that the US agreed to. It is hard to understand if they are stupid, if they think we are stupid, if that are just that callous, or all of the above.

All of the above!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lebanon is about Iran showboating to the Arab states that they are the real protector of Arab states against Israeli aggression. It’s a way to embarrass the gulf states.

All of that oil, all of that money but zero leverage or powerbrokers that can challenge Zionist/Us hegemony and aggression in the region.

The governments in Jordan, UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar are the biggest losers in this war. They gained nothing but humiliation and embarrassment from Iran, Donald Trump, Israel, Kushner.

Regional winners Iran, Turkey, Iraq and Syria. Israel and US neoconzoinists are living in Jan 2026. April 2026 is a much different world thanks to Mr Trump.

Let’s face it. Iran’s demands are for the most part facts on the ground. Unless you want to invade Iran you can not change any of it.

Israel is very lucky Iran is not requiring Israel to give up it nuclear weapons, enriched material, long range struck missiles, etc. it would be only fair for Iran to demand the same that Israel has demanded of them.

How is Iraq and Syria winning?

The only winner if there is any is the Palestinians because they know who the Israelis are and the rest of the Arab states are naive and sitting ducks

In the long run, I only see mass exodus and bad days ahead for Israel. They are really underplaying the damage in Israel to not freak out the population but eventually, the right wing Vs left wing conflict in the Middle East will bear its wings and the US political landscape will change dramatically in 2028 that pro Israel candidate may be a red line for voters. Netanyahu is causing generational tears and I don’t see how it can repaired unless drastic measures are taken like ruining democracy in America and Israel in favor of autocracy and I don’t put it past him to want this. Trump wants to run again in 2028 and at a Jewish Hanukah event at the White House, Mariam Adelson (his biggest Jewish donor) also repeated this “joke”

Anonymous wrote:It seems to be the Israel and now US MO to "agree" to a ceasefire and then violate it.

Then again, there is no trustworthy partner where Trump is concerned. I have no idea why anyone would negotiate with him, given his chronic bad faith.

I don’t think it’s the US’s MO. The US is just scared to chastize Israel in public. Israel would’ve been sanctioned by now if it were any other country.

They’re too dangerous, vicious, and unstable to be considered a civilized nation

https://www.commondreams.org/news/israel-lebanon-iran-ceasefire

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why Republicans want this war with Iran. There was a perfectly good deal under Obama that constrained Iran's nuclear program and kept the Strait of Hormuz open for everyone. Every war plan and gaming exercise started with the assumption that Iran would seize control of Hormuz and take control of 20 percent of the world's oil and gas. That's rudimentary geopolitics. So why start a war at all when the US already had everything they wanted under Obama - free passage and no nukes for Iran. And now there is zero change Iran is going to give up control of Hormuz and abstain from pursuing nuclear weapons.

So what was the point? The US - and the world - is the huge strategic loser here. Are Republicans just dumbasses? Are Republicans all servile to Israel, which wants chaos in the Middle East? For America's interests, this may be the dumbest war in modern history.

The point is backing Trump. If they don't, they're attacked. There is no reason that makes sense. It's their show of loyalty.

FFS - attacked? Are they babies or men who have agency? Such a pussy defense. They are spineless cowards who will prostrate themselves for a crumb.

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why Republicans want this war with Iran. There was a perfectly good deal under Obama that constrained Iran's nuclear program and kept the Strait of Hormuz open for everyone. Every war plan and gaming exercise started with the assumption that Iran would seize control of Hormuz and take control of 20 percent of the world's oil and gas. That's rudimentary geopolitics. So why start a war at all when the US already had everything they wanted under Obama - free passage and no nukes for Iran. And now there is zero change Iran is going to give up control of Hormuz and abstain from pursuing nuclear weapons.

So what was the point? The US - and the world - is the huge strategic loser here. Are Republicans just dumbasses? Are Republicans all servile to Israel, which wants chaos in the Middle East? For America's interests, this may be the dumbest war in modern history.

Hillary wanted war with Iran as well or at least she said so in 2008, but then she als worked on the JCPOA as Sec of State. That deal was honestly the best thing going to defang Iran and at least monitor their nuclear enrichment. Thanks to Netanyahu’s clumsiness, the deal is no more and Iran if they’re smart (and they are) will now definitely see to it that they become nuclear armed. They wouldn’t be at war right now if they were

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why Republicans want this war with Iran. There was a perfectly good deal under Obama that constrained Iran's nuclear program and kept the Strait of Hormuz open for everyone. Every war plan and gaming exercise started with the assumption that Iran would seize control of Hormuz and take control of 20 percent of the world's oil and gas. That's rudimentary geopolitics. So why start a war at all when the US already had everything they wanted under Obama - free passage and no nukes for Iran. And now there is zero change Iran is going to give up control of Hormuz and abstain from pursuing nuclear weapons.

So what was the point? The US - and the world - is the huge strategic loser here. Are Republicans just dumbasses? Are Republicans all servile to Israel, which wants chaos in the Middle East? For America's interests, this may be the dumbest war in modern history.

Bibi has been lobbying American presidents since Clinton to attack Iran saying they will have nuclear weapons in few years.
He convinced Trump if we drop huge amounts and fast the government will collapse and you will be a hero.
Trump thinking it would be like Venezuela
went for it without plan B.
So here we are.

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why Republicans want this war with Iran. There was a perfectly good deal under Obama that constrained Iran's nuclear program and kept the Strait of Hormuz open for everyone. Every war plan and gaming exercise started with the assumption that Iran would seize control of Hormuz and take control of 20 percent of the world's oil and gas. That's rudimentary geopolitics. So why start a war at all when the US already had everything they wanted under Obama - free passage and no nukes for Iran. And now there is zero change Iran is going to give up control of Hormuz and abstain from pursuing nuclear weapons.

So what was the point? The US - and the world - is the huge strategic loser here. Are Republicans just dumbasses? Are Republicans all servile to Israel, which wants chaos in the Middle East? For America's interests, this may be the dumbest war in modern history.

The point is backing Trump. If they don't, they're attacked. There is no reason that makes sense. It's their show of loyalty.

Sky News: "While Trump, the so-called leader of the free world, sits rage-posting on SM like a man screaming into a void, France, Japan, Philippines, & UK are quietly, methodically cutting deals with Iran. The world has moved on & US Mainstream Media is not covering a bit of this."

Anonymous wrote:American Billionaires of Ashkenazi descent will decide:

Energy for the world or protecting Israel. Thats a tough position for them to be in.

Energy, fertilizer, aluminum, helium, and flourine

Anonymous wrote:I still don't understand why Republicans want this war with Iran. There was a perfectly good deal under Obama that constrained Iran's nuclear program and kept the Strait of Hormuz open for everyone. Every war plan and gaming exercise started with the assumption that Iran would seize control of Hormuz and take control of 20 percent of the world's oil and gas. That's rudimentary geopolitics. So why start a war at all when the US already had everything they wanted under Obama - free passage and no nukes for Iran. And now there is zero change Iran is going to give up control of Hormuz and abstain from pursuing nuclear weapons.

So what was the point? The US - and the world - is the huge strategic loser here. Are Republicans just dumbasses? Are Republicans all servile to Israel, which wants chaos in the Middle East? For America's interests, this may be the dumbest war in modern history.

If it's not for America's interests but for some other interests then I guess it makes sense.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3miz2ahe4es2n

JD Vance: "I think this comes from a legitimate misunderstanding. I think the Iranians thought the ceasefire included Lebanon, and it just didn't. We never made that promise, we never indicated that was gonna be the case."

Lebanon was literally in the 10 point plan that the US agreed to. It is hard to understand if they are stupid, if they think we are stupid, if that are just that callous, or all of the above.

The US isn't bombing Lebanon. Israel is. Seems to me that Iran needs to be prosecuting a deal with Israel.

Just so we are clear: you are saying we should leave Israel high and dry?

Israel has repeatedly tried to sabotage any effort at peace. How many times have they assasinated negotiators in the midst of negotiations? 3 or 4?

They knew what the terms were and willfully violated them. Their continued blood lust is harming us. They're more instransigent and expansionist than Iran is. Let that sink in.

Do you have a better idea?

+1 Israel and Netanyahu specifically continue to benefit politically from this war while no one else does. If they can’t agree to stop bombing they are the problem.

I still don't understand why Republicans want this war with Iran. There was a perfectly good deal under Obama that constrained Iran's nuclear program and kept the Strait of Hormuz open for everyone. Every war plan and gaming exercise started with the assumption that Iran would seize control of Hormuz and take control of 20 percent of the world's oil and gas. That's rudimentary geopolitics. So why start a war at all when the US already had everything they wanted under Obama - free passage and no nukes for Iran. And now there is zero change Iran is going to give up control of Hormuz and abstain from pursuing nuclear weapons.

So what was the point? The US - and the world - is the huge strategic loser here. Are Republicans just dumbasses? Are Republicans all servile to Israel, which wants chaos in the Middle East? For America's interests, this may be the dumbest war in modern history.

So it looks like USA has to put pressure on Israel to stop bombing in order to open the Strait. This should be interesting.
I’m all for it. As long as Bibi is in control, we have to cut off Israel.