Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did Democrats object to releasing the Epstein files today?
Tim Burchett asked for unanimous consent, and Democrats blocked it.
Was this a Trojan horse in the unanimous consent rules?

They didn't. His spin to the media is a lie, of course. You can watch what really happened on CSPAN. His request could not be entertianed because the Republican Speaker Pro Tempore said Burchett had not followed the rules and because he did not have the consent of Republican Mike Johnson, who is on record opposing Burchett's attempt.

My guess is that he tried this because it would have allowed the no votes to hide.

Those who are going to vote NO to release must be on the record individually voting no to the release when they do the vote by normal procedures next week. Burkett tried to end run that and let the no voters try save face (which may mean he is actually a no vote himself).

And no one should be able to hide thier vote on this. The people have a right to know whether a congress person is complicit in tis coverup.

+1 Burchett is pissing on your leg and telling you it’s raining. He filed a House Resolution (H.Res.577) to release the Epstein files which would have required unanimous consent. He was trying to spare Republicans from having to record their vote on the House Bill under a discharge petition.

Jeffries objected.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously timed for the return of the House:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein-emails.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20251112&instance_id=166274&nl=breaking-news®i_id=130978122&segment_id=210450&user_id=fcb1b8a728d5f78d42df74f0dbc09f85


EPSTEIN ALLEGED IN E-MAILS THAT TRUMP KNEW OF HIS CONDUCT

In a message obtained by Congress, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein's victims.

It's pretty clear this leak was timed for the House reconvening after being off 59 days. Johnson is swearing in Adelita Grijalva, who will become the 218th signature on the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.

The fact that more information hasn't be released or leaked sooner and faster the past few years makes it obvious there is an effort by very powerful people to keep as much info sealed for as long as possible. As far as Trump's involvement is concerned; it's very likely he at least knew of Epstein's disgusting and criminal wrongdoings at the time they were happening and it's certainly plausible he participated in the wrongdoings. Best case for Trump, which really isn't a best anything, is that he is one of many powerful politicians seeking to provide cover for ultra-wealthy political donors who have ties to those implicated in the files.

Trump joked that Epstein liked them young.

Joked about it.

Even though he had a daughter.

Trump has two daughters though he only lusts after Ivanka.

You don’t remember the TV interview shortly after Tiffany’s birth when he talked about her legs being very nice and speculated on how good her breasts would be once she got old enough to have some???

Marla was sitting next to him and she smiled one of those mortified smiles - no surprise that marriage didn’t last, Marla the raised in America wife didn’t have the stomach for his disgusting lack of character.

Yes, the man sexualized his newborn infant daughter.

To be honest Marla's character was wanting.

I mean, you’re not wrong in that I can’t imagine how any woman would want to marry this ugly pompous gasbag creep, but he had a lot of money and many women are drawn to the payday.

But she had enough character to leave him in fairly short order and to stay well away from his orbit ever since, she doesn’t glom on to his creepy life like Ivana did for so many years.

Right, but let's not get drawn into the very minor character flaws of Trump's wives. The real elephant in the room, the abysmal character flaw, is Trump's. This is what we're discussing here.

I don’t disagree.

I think it’s notable that the guy’s bestest friend, a child sex trafficker who laundered money and blackmailed wealthy acquaintances and apparently tried to sell secrets about said people to foreign governments, said of Donald Trump: ‘i have met some very bad people, none as bad as trump. not one decent cell in his body.’

So the news is that sex trafficker agrees with Democrats?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously timed for the return of the House:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein-emails.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20251112&instance_id=166274&nl=breaking-news®i_id=130978122&segment_id=210450&user_id=fcb1b8a728d5f78d42df74f0dbc09f85


EPSTEIN ALLEGED IN E-MAILS THAT TRUMP KNEW OF HIS CONDUCT

In a message obtained by Congress, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein's victims.

It's pretty clear this leak was timed for the House reconvening after being off 59 days. Johnson is swearing in Adelita Grijalva, who will become the 218th signature on the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.

The fact that more information hasn't be released or leaked sooner and faster the past few years makes it obvious there is an effort by very powerful people to keep as much info sealed for as long as possible. As far as Trump's involvement is concerned; it's very likely he at least knew of Epstein's disgusting and criminal wrongdoings at the time they were happening and it's certainly plausible he participated in the wrongdoings. Best case for Trump, which really isn't a best anything, is that he is one of many powerful politicians seeking to provide cover for ultra-wealthy political donors who have ties to those implicated in the files.

Trump joked that Epstein liked them young.

Joked about it.

Even though he had a daughter.

Trump has two daughters though he only lusts after Ivanka.

You don’t remember the TV interview shortly after Tiffany’s birth when he talked about her legs being very nice and speculated on how good her breasts would be once she got old enough to have some???

Marla was sitting next to him and she smiled one of those mortified smiles - no surprise that marriage didn’t last, Marla the raised in America wife didn’t have the stomach for his disgusting lack of character.

Yes, the man sexualized his newborn infant daughter.

To be honest Marla's character was wanting.

I mean, you’re not wrong in that I can’t imagine how any woman would want to marry this ugly pompous gasbag creep, but he had a lot of money and many women are drawn to the payday.

But she had enough character to leave him in fairly short order and to stay well away from his orbit ever since, she doesn’t glom on to his creepy life like Ivana did for so many years.

Right, but let's not get drawn into the very minor character flaws of Trump's wives. The real elephant in the room, the abysmal character flaw, is Trump's. This is what we're discussing here.

I don’t disagree.

I think it’s notable that the guy’s bestest friend, a child sex trafficker who laundered money and blackmailed wealthy acquaintances and apparently tried to sell secrets about said people to foreign governments, said of Donald Trump: ‘i have met some very bad people, none as bad as trump. not one decent cell in his body.’

So the news is that sex trafficker agrees with Democrats?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously timed for the return of the House:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein-emails.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20251112&instance_id=166274&nl=breaking-news®i_id=130978122&segment_id=210450&user_id=fcb1b8a728d5f78d42df74f0dbc09f85


EPSTEIN ALLEGED IN E-MAILS THAT TRUMP KNEW OF HIS CONDUCT

In a message obtained by Congress, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein's victims.

It's pretty clear this leak was timed for the House reconvening after being off 59 days. Johnson is swearing in Adelita Grijalva, who will become the 218th signature on the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.

The fact that more information hasn't be released or leaked sooner and faster the past few years makes it obvious there is an effort by very powerful people to keep as much info sealed for as long as possible. As far as Trump's involvement is concerned; it's very likely he at least knew of Epstein's disgusting and criminal wrongdoings at the time they were happening and it's certainly plausible he participated in the wrongdoings. Best case for Trump, which really isn't a best anything, is that he is one of many powerful politicians seeking to provide cover for ultra-wealthy political donors who have ties to those implicated in the files.

Trump joked that Epstein liked them young.

Joked about it.

Even though he had a daughter.

Trump has two daughters though he only lusts after Ivanka.

You don’t remember the TV interview shortly after Tiffany’s birth when he talked about her legs being very nice and speculated on how good her breasts would be once she got old enough to have some???

Marla was sitting next to him and she smiled one of those mortified smiles - no surprise that marriage didn’t last, Marla the raised in America wife didn’t have the stomach for his disgusting lack of character.

Yes, the man sexualized his newborn infant daughter.

To be honest Marla's character was wanting.

Wow, PP. Some introspection is called for.

Trump was married and she had no qualms about dating a married man. It's immaterial that he is a human junk yard dog and will have sex with anyone.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously timed for the return of the House:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein-emails.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20251112&instance_id=166274&nl=breaking-news®i_id=130978122&segment_id=210450&user_id=fcb1b8a728d5f78d42df74f0dbc09f85


EPSTEIN ALLEGED IN E-MAILS THAT TRUMP KNEW OF HIS CONDUCT

In a message obtained by Congress, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein's victims.

It's pretty clear this leak was timed for the House reconvening after being off 59 days. Johnson is swearing in Adelita Grijalva, who will become the 218th signature on the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.

The fact that more information hasn't be released or leaked sooner and faster the past few years makes it obvious there is an effort by very powerful people to keep as much info sealed for as long as possible. As far as Trump's involvement is concerned; it's very likely he at least knew of Epstein's disgusting and criminal wrongdoings at the time they were happening and it's certainly plausible he participated in the wrongdoings. Best case for Trump, which really isn't a best anything, is that he is one of many powerful politicians seeking to provide cover for ultra-wealthy political donors who have ties to those implicated in the files.

Trump joked that Epstein liked them young.

Joked about it.

Even though he had a daughter.

Trump has two daughters though he only lusts after Ivanka.

You don’t remember the TV interview shortly after Tiffany’s birth when he talked about her legs being very nice and speculated on how good her breasts would be once she got old enough to have some???

Marla was sitting next to him and she smiled one of those mortified smiles - no surprise that marriage didn’t last, Marla the raised in America wife didn’t have the stomach for his disgusting lack of character.

Yes, the man sexualized his newborn infant daughter.

To be honest Marla's character was wanting.

Wow, PP. Some introspection is called for.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did Democrats object to releasing the Epstein files today?
Tim Burchett asked for unanimous consent, and Democrats blocked it.
Was this a Trojan horse in the unanimous consent rules?

They didn't. His spin to the media is a lie, of course. You can watch what really happened on CSPAN. His request could not be entertianed because the Republican Speaker Pro Tempore said Burchett had not followed the rules and because he did not have the consent of Republican Mike Johnson, who is on record opposing Burchett's attempt.

My guess is that he tried this because it would have allowed the no votes to hide.

Those who are going to vote NO to release must be on the record individually voting no to the release when they do the vote by normal procedures next week. Burkett tried to end run that and let the no voters try save face (which may mean he is actually a no vote himself).

And no one should be able to hide thier vote on this. The people have a right to know whether a congress person is complicit in tis coverup.

+1 Burchett is pissing on your leg and telling you it’s raining. He filed a House Resolution (H.Res.577) to release the Epstein files which would have required unanimous consent. He was trying to spare Republicans from having to record their vote on the House Bill under a discharge petition.

Jeffries objected.

You’re also an all day sucker. Jeffries objected because he wants each member of Congress to vote, which unanimous consent would prevent.

You’ve got something wet on your leg.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did Democrats object to releasing the Epstein files today?
Tim Burchett asked for unanimous consent, and Democrats blocked it.
Was this a Trojan horse in the unanimous consent rules?

They didn't. His spin to the media is a lie, of course. You can watch what really happened on CSPAN. His request could not be entertianed because the Republican Speaker Pro Tempore said Burchett had not followed the rules and because he did not have the consent of Republican Mike Johnson, who is on record opposing Burchett's attempt.

My guess is that he tried this because it would have allowed the no votes to hide.

Those who are going to vote NO to release must be on the record individually voting no to the release when they do the vote by normal procedures next week. Burkett tried to end run that and let the no voters try save face (which may mean he is actually a no vote himself).

And no one should be able to hide thier vote on this. The people have a right to know whether a congress person is complicit in tis coverup.

+1 Burchett is pissing on your leg and telling you it’s raining. He filed a House Resolution (H.Res.577) to release the Epstein files which would have required unanimous consent. He was trying to spare Republicans from having to record their vote on the House Bill under a discharge petition.

Jeffries objected.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did Democrats object to releasing the Epstein files today?
Tim Burchett asked for unanimous consent, and Democrats blocked it.
Was this a Trojan horse in the unanimous consent rules?

They didn't. His spin to the media is a lie, of course. You can watch what really happened on CSPAN. His request could not be entertianed because the Republican Speaker Pro Tempore said Burchett had not followed the rules and because he did not have the consent of Republican Mike Johnson, who is on record opposing Burchett's attempt.

My guess is that he tried this because it would have allowed the no votes to hide.

Those who are going to vote NO to release must be on the record individually voting no to the release when they do the vote by normal procedures next week. Burkett tried to end run that and let the no voters try save face (which may mean he is actually a no vote himself).

And no one should be able to hide thier vote on this. The people have a right to know whether a congress person is complicit in tis coverup.

+1 Burchett is pissing on your leg and telling you it’s raining. He filed a House Resolution (H.Res.577) to release the Epstein files which would have required unanimous consent. He was trying to spare Republicans from having to record their vote on the House Bill under a discharge petition.

Jeffries objected.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously timed for the return of the House:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein-emails.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20251112&instance_id=166274&nl=breaking-news®i_id=130978122&segment_id=210450&user_id=fcb1b8a728d5f78d42df74f0dbc09f85


EPSTEIN ALLEGED IN E-MAILS THAT TRUMP KNEW OF HIS CONDUCT

In a message obtained by Congress, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein's victims.

It's pretty clear this leak was timed for the House reconvening after being off 59 days. Johnson is swearing in Adelita Grijalva, who will become the 218th signature on the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.

The fact that more information hasn't be released or leaked sooner and faster the past few years makes it obvious there is an effort by very powerful people to keep as much info sealed for as long as possible. As far as Trump's involvement is concerned; it's very likely he at least knew of Epstein's disgusting and criminal wrongdoings at the time they were happening and it's certainly plausible he participated in the wrongdoings. Best case for Trump, which really isn't a best anything, is that he is one of many powerful politicians seeking to provide cover for ultra-wealthy political donors who have ties to those implicated in the files.

Trump joked that Epstein liked them young.

Joked about it.

Even though he had a daughter.

Trump has two daughters though he only lusts after Ivanka.

You don’t remember the TV interview shortly after Tiffany’s birth when he talked about her legs being very nice and speculated on how good her breasts would be once she got old enough to have some???

Marla was sitting next to him and she smiled one of those mortified smiles - no surprise that marriage didn’t last, Marla the raised in America wife didn’t have the stomach for his disgusting lack of character.

Yes, the man sexualized his newborn infant daughter.

To be honest Marla's character was wanting.

I mean, you’re not wrong in that I can’t imagine how any woman would want to marry this ugly pompous gasbag creep, but he had a lot of money and many women are drawn to the payday.

But she had enough character to leave him in fairly short order and to stay well away from his orbit ever since, she doesn’t glom on to his creepy life like Ivana did for so many years.

Right, but let's not get drawn into the very minor character flaws of Trump's wives. The real elephant in the room, the abysmal character flaw, is Trump's. This is what we're discussing here.

I don’t disagree.

I think it’s notable that the guy’s bestest friend, a child sex trafficker who laundered money and blackmailed wealthy acquaintances and apparently tried to sell secrets about said people to foreign governments, said of Donald Trump: ‘i have met some very bad people, none as bad as trump. not one decent cell in his body.’

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did Democrats object to releasing the Epstein files today?
Tim Burchett asked for unanimous consent, and Democrats blocked it.
Was this a Trojan horse in the unanimous consent rules?

They didn't. His spin to the media is a lie, of course. You can watch what really happened on CSPAN. His request could not be entertianed because the Republican Speaker Pro Tempore said Burchett had not followed the rules and because he did not have the consent of Republican Mike Johnson, who is on record opposing Burchett's attempt.

My guess is that he tried this because it would have allowed the no votes to hide.

Those who are going to vote NO to release must be on the record individually voting no to the release when they do the vote by normal procedures next week. Burkett tried to end run that and let the no voters try save face (which may mean he is actually a no vote himself).

And no one should be able to hide thier vote on this. The people have a right to know whether a congress person is complicit in tis coverup.

+1 Burchett is pissing on your leg and telling you it’s raining. He filed a House Resolution (H.Res.577) to release the Epstein files which would have required unanimous consent. He was trying to spare Republicans from having to record their vote on the House Bill under a discharge petition.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously timed for the return of the House:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein-emails.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20251112&instance_id=166274&nl=breaking-news®i_id=130978122&segment_id=210450&user_id=fcb1b8a728d5f78d42df74f0dbc09f85


EPSTEIN ALLEGED IN E-MAILS THAT TRUMP KNEW OF HIS CONDUCT

In a message obtained by Congress, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein's victims.

It's pretty clear this leak was timed for the House reconvening after being off 59 days. Johnson is swearing in Adelita Grijalva, who will become the 218th signature on the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.

The fact that more information hasn't be released or leaked sooner and faster the past few years makes it obvious there is an effort by very powerful people to keep as much info sealed for as long as possible. As far as Trump's involvement is concerned; it's very likely he at least knew of Epstein's disgusting and criminal wrongdoings at the time they were happening and it's certainly plausible he participated in the wrongdoings. Best case for Trump, which really isn't a best anything, is that he is one of many powerful politicians seeking to provide cover for ultra-wealthy political donors who have ties to those implicated in the files.

Trump joked that Epstein liked them young.

Joked about it.

Even though he had a daughter.

Trump has two daughters though he only lusts after Ivanka.

You don’t remember the TV interview shortly after Tiffany’s birth when he talked about her legs being very nice and speculated on how good her breasts would be once she got old enough to have some???

Marla was sitting next to him and she smiled one of those mortified smiles - no surprise that marriage didn’t last, Marla the raised in America wife didn’t have the stomach for his disgusting lack of character.

Yes, the man sexualized his newborn infant daughter.