Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tufts initially was more prestigious. Then over time BC, BU and Northeastern have become stronger while Tufts has taken a step back a bit. In the 1980's no one would have compared Tufts to those 3 schools. Even back then Holy Cross was considered better than BC.

Now depending on the major those other schools might be better than Tufts. Although Tufts is still a powerhouse in pre-med, pre-dentist, pre-vet.

lol at northeastern. a true joke

Granny, old time is long gone.
It's almost 2026. Leave it to the new generations.

31% submitted test scores and the 1450 to 1520 range is especially mediocre given this. And only 68% in top 10% of class. Yes, let's leave it to the newer generations of bad students misled by even worse marketing.

This was 2018 little before pandemic when test was required. Not much change for Northeastern.

https://talk.collegeconfidential.com/t/50-smartest-colleges-in-america-by-average-sat-score/2022047

Northeastern #26 including LACs.

Oldtimers please stand down.

If 1450-1520 is mediocre, I guess Harvard's 25% score of 1460 when it was test mandatory means Harvard is a mediocre college.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory, UF, UVA , Georgetown, WashU students are about the same caliber.. could there be some who are T10 caliber ? Of course. But the vast majority aint…

No they are not. By test score its
WashU>Emory>Georgetown>UVa>>UF

The gap between WashU and Emory is tiny, statistically not a difference.
1490-1550/33-35
1470-1540/33-35

Georgetown is lower than UVa although it is TR and UVa is TO.
It should look like this
WashU=Emory>>UVa>Georgetown>>UF
UF is no where near Emory or WashU.

The resident Emory hater will still say its garbage because of 20 points.

Emory is a joke. 76% of those ranked in top 10% of class with medicore GPAs. 75% have under a 3.75 unweighted. 35% under a 3.49. Mediocre and the students don't even want to go when admitted.

The better comparison is Washu > Georgetown > UVa > Florida >>>>>>> Emory

https://provost.emory.edu/planning-administration/data/factbook/admissions.html

You have a very low iq. How would 75% have lower than a 3.75, if the avg is a 3.83 and 76% are in the top 10%? Logically,... mathematically that wouldn't work. You dont know how to read the graph and corresponding percentages correctly thus making obviously dumb conclusions. 76.13% of enrolled at Emory have a 3.75uw or higher.

what the hell? the chart literally shows 65% have under a 3.75.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tufts initially was more prestigious. Then over time BC, BU and Northeastern have become stronger while Tufts has taken a step back a bit. In the 1980's no one would have compared Tufts to those 3 schools. Even back then Holy Cross was considered better than BC.

Now depending on the major those other schools might be better than Tufts. Although Tufts is still a powerhouse in pre-med, pre-dentist, pre-vet.

lol at northeastern. a true joke

Granny, old time is long gone.
It's almost 2026. Leave it to the new generations.

31% submitted test scores and the 1450 to 1520 range is especially mediocre given this. And only 68% in top 10% of class. Yes, let's leave it to the newer generations of bad students misled by even worse marketing.

This was 2018 little before pandemic when test was required. Not much change for Northeastern.

https://talk.collegeconfidential.com/t/50-smartest-colleges-in-america-by-average-sat-score/2022047

Northeastern #26 including LACs.

Oldtimers please stand down.

If 1450-1520 is mediocre, I guess Harvard's 25% score of 1460 when it was test mandatory means Harvard is a mediocre college.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory, UF, UVA , Georgetown, WashU students are about the same caliber.. could there be some who are T10 caliber ? Of course. But the vast majority aint…

No they are not. By test score its
WashU>Emory>Georgetown>UVa>>UF

The gap between WashU and Emory is tiny, statistically not a difference.
1490-1550/33-35
1470-1540/33-35

Georgetown is lower than UVa although it is TR and UVa is TO.
It should look like this
WashU=Emory>>UVa>Georgetown>>UF
UF is no where near Emory or WashU.

The resident Emory hater will still say its garbage because of 20 points.

Emory is a joke. 76% of those ranked in top 10% of class with medicore GPAs. 75% have under a 3.75 unweighted. 35% under a 3.49. Mediocre and the students don't even want to go when admitted.

The better comparison is Washu > Georgetown > UVa > Florida >>>>>>> Emory

https://provost.emory.edu/planning-administration/data/factbook/admissions.html

You have a very low iq. How would 75% have lower than a 3.75, if the avg is a 3.83 and 76% are in the top 10%? Logically,... mathematically that wouldn't work. You dont know how to read the graph and corresponding percentages correctly thus making obviously dumb conclusions. 76.13% of enrolled at Emory have a 3.75uw or higher.

Anonymous wrote:Emory's bad stats get skewed by Oxford College which is the two year college that feeds into Emory for those rejected from Emory Atlanta.

Anonymous wrote:Emory's bad stats get skewed by Oxford College which is the two year college that feeds into Emory for those rejected from Emory Atlanta.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BC, BU, and NEU have no prestige.

So who cares? If students receive a good education and have rich experiences at school, that’s what matters most.
Students don’t have to satisfy those who are stuck chasing old fashioned prestige.

Sure, you can live in your own world and talk about prestige, but in the end, that’s not the core value of success or happiness.

Anonymous wrote:Emory's bad stats get skewed by Oxford College which is the two year college that feeds into Emory for those rejected from Emory Atlanta.

Anonymous wrote:I think these are all good schools. But for full pay families, I dont see the value. My kid is at UCL - very happily. Would we have paid for T10 schools, sure. Although she got into Vandy and still choose UCL (that was more about strength of major).

I can see going down a level for merit. But, for us, overseas is where the price meets value.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tufts initially was more prestigious. Then over time BC, BU and Northeastern have become stronger while Tufts has taken a step back a bit. In the 1980's no one would have compared Tufts to those 3 schools. Even back then Holy Cross was considered better than BC.

Now depending on the major those other schools might be better than Tufts. Although Tufts is still a powerhouse in pre-med, pre-dentist, pre-vet.

lol at northeastern. a true joke

Granny, old time is long gone.
It's almost 2026. Leave it to the new generations.

31% submitted test scores and the 1450 to 1520 range is especially mediocre given this. And only 68% in top 10% of class. Yes, let's leave it to the newer generations of bad students misled by even worse marketing.

This was 2018 little before pandemic when test was required. Not much change for Northeastern.

https://talk.collegeconfidential.com/t/50-smartest-colleges-in-america-by-average-sat-score/2022047

Northeastern #26 including LACs.

Oldtimers please stand down.

Anonymous wrote:BC, BU, and NEU have no prestige.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tufts initially was more prestigious. Then over time BC, BU and Northeastern have become stronger while Tufts has taken a step back a bit. In the 1980's no one would have compared Tufts to those 3 schools. Even back then Holy Cross was considered better than BC.

Now depending on the major those other schools might be better than Tufts. Although Tufts is still a powerhouse in pre-med, pre-dentist, pre-vet.

lol at northeastern. a true joke

Granny, old time is long gone.
It's almost 2026. Leave it to the new generations.

31% submitted test scores and the 1450 to 1520 range is especially mediocre given this. And only 68% in top 10% of class. Yes, let's leave it to the newer generations of bad students misled by even worse marketing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory, UF, UVA , Georgetown, WashU students are about the same caliber.. could there be some who are T10 caliber ? Of course. But the vast majority aint…

No they are not. By test score its
WashU>Emory>Georgetown>UVa>>UF

The gap between WashU and Emory is tiny, statistically not a difference.
1490-1550/33-35
1470-1540/33-35

Georgetown is lower than UVa although it is TR and UVa is TO.
It should look like this
WashU=Emory>>UVa>Georgetown>>UF
UF is no where near Emory or WashU.

The resident Emory hater will still say its garbage because of 20 points.

Emory is a joke. 76% of those ranked in top 10% of class with medicore GPAs. 75% have under a 3.75 unweighted. 35% under a 3.49. Mediocre and the students don't even want to go when admitted.

The better comparison is Washu > Georgetown > UVa > Florida >>>>>>> Emory