Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Silver lining is how much money the RNC will have to waste defending the seat.
They’re already spending SO MUCH to get Cornyn to beat Paxton because Paxton is the one who’s most likely to lose to Talarico or Crockett (in order of likelihood.)
Crockett doesn't have an ice cube's chance in hell in Texas.
Adjust your reality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Michigan is going to lose a Democratic seat. Haley Stevens is a terrible candidate.
You do know there is a Democratic primary right? And no, Michigan is not going to lose a Dem senator.
She has too much money for someone to beat her.
So did Coumo. Haley Stevens is seen as a Chuck Schumer lackey. His stink will sink her. Peopel do not want out of touch politicians, especially now. I do wish Abdul El-Sayed would drop out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Silver lining is how much money the RNC will have to waste defending the seat.
They’re already spending SO MUCH to get Cornyn to beat Paxton because Paxton is the one who’s most likely to lose to Talarico or Crockett (in order of likelihood.)
Crockett doesn't have an ice cube's chance in hell in Texas.
Adjust your reality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Texas agreed to share voter data with admin and the state will presumably listen to admin for which people to purge from voter rolls. If voters that are more likely to vote against administration are selectively purged from voter roles, couldn’t this make it almost impossible for Dems to win?
Yes, but they run the risk of removing Trump voters as well, particularly in the redistricted areas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Silver lining is how much money the RNC will have to waste defending the seat.
They’re already spending SO MUCH to get Cornyn to beat Paxton because Paxton is the one who’s most likely to lose to Talarico or Crockett (in order of likelihood.)
Crockett doesn't have an ice cube's chance in hell in Texas.
Adjust your reality.
Anonymous wrote:Texas agreed to share voter data with admin and the state will presumably listen to admin for which people to purge from voter rolls. If voters that are more likely to vote against administration are selectively purged from voter roles, couldn’t this make it almost impossible for Dems to win?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Silver lining is how much money the RNC will have to waste defending the seat.
They’re already spending SO MUCH to get Cornyn to beat Paxton because Paxton is the one who’s most likely to lose to Talarico or Crockett (in order of likelihood.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BREAKING NEWS: The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Senate Leadership Fund — the SuperPAC aligned with the Senate Republican Leader John Thune — has pledged to spend $40 million to re-elect #Maine Senator Susan Collins. This is in addition to Senator Collins's campaign and several other SuperPACs supporting her. SLF's executive director said “Collins is the only Republican candidate that can win Maine. She is critical to maintaining the Senate majority and we will be there for her."
$40mn just for Maine? Uh oh. Let’s hope the fundamentals there have changed and this ends up being $40mn the GOP tosses down the drain.
ICE has just been deployed to Maine.
Trump making a contribution to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. How nice of him.
I hope so. Susan Collins, despite being useless, seems to have nine lives.
Anonymous wrote:Texas agreed to share voter data with admin and the state will presumably listen to admin for which people to purge from voter rolls. If voters that are more likely to vote against administration are selectively purged from voter roles, couldn’t this make it almost impossible for Dems to win?
Anonymous wrote:
Silver lining is how much money the RNC will have to waste defending the seat.