Anonymous wrote:Stop blaming misogyny for simply being a sh!tty candidate or bad at you job.
Put your nose to the grind and earn your stripes up. Life isn't fair, and it is a dog eat dog world. No one owes you anything. You are not entitled to anything because you have a vagina despite what your permanent victimhood.classes taught you while you were in college going $180k in debt for a worthless degree.
This might shock you, but there are women who are good at their jobs and who are terrible at their jobs. Just like men. There are far more people who are mediocre to bad than good, which means most women, just like men, are mediocre to bad. Next time, pick good female candidates of you want to win elections, not thoroughly mid to bad selections like Hillary and Harris.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a women who voted for Hillary, Warren in primary, and Harris, I will not endorse a women again because this country is not ready. My boys are, but only one can vote in the next election cycle
You think people didn't elect Hillary because they weren't ready for a woman 8 years ago? Maybe, but more likely because people didn't like her, her platform, her shiftiness, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.
In what world is a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon a better candidate?
It’s not exactly secret that women have to be near perfect to secure the same job an average man has access to.
Anonymous wrote:
The best way to combat it is to not give it power. Pursue your dreams. Work hard so you are better, stronger, smarter. Ignore the incels and leave them in your dust!
Never reward toxic masculinity and don’t raise turds! Support your sons in all their interests. Don’t steer them away from things you don’t consider manly. Support SAHM dads!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More women need to stay in the workforce so that it’s easier for all of us to fight for equal rights and work life balance. But the opposite will happen because of cultural forces and the trump administration—I’m sure Vance will find a way to stick it to working women.
I'm a woman and I'd rather be with my children. We saved our money for years, why do I want to sit in a cube for the sisterhood?
Anonymous wrote:More women need to stay in the workforce so that it’s easier for all of us to fight for equal rights and work life balance. But the opposite will happen because of cultural forces and the trump administration—I’m sure Vance will find a way to stick it to working women.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.
In what world is a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon a better candidate?
Anonymous wrote:More women need to stay in the workforce so that it’s easier for all of us to fight for equal rights and work life balance. But the opposite will happen because of cultural forces and the trump administration—I’m sure Vance will find a way to stick it to working women.
Anonymous wrote:No, women need to be at home taking care of their children instead of Day Care strangers.Anonymous wrote:More women need to stay in the workforce so that it’s easier for all of us to fight for equal rights and work life balance. But the opposite will happen because of cultural forces and the trump administration—I’m sure Vance will find a way to stick it to working women.
And women already have equal rights, what feminist hags are running their stupid loud mouths about are having “special rights” where having a vagina automatically gets you hired for a management or CEO position.
Trump and Vance will hopefully bring in more merit-based hiring in the govt instead of Diversity/DEI quota hires.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's apparent that it runs incredibly deep in this country, where a woman's professional status is put under a significantly higher scrutiny than a man's, or the standards for which she could be put in the same professional level with a man (or higher) are impossibly unrealistic. She will never be "enough" even compared to males with mediocrity.
If we can somehow avoid talking about politics, can we please have a serious discussion about how deep misogyny runs in America (and yes, much more than many other places--or at least in different ways) and how we can successfully combat it? Is it possible? What do you think works well in other countries? What can we do here?
We can't with an administration coming in where both the president and VP are raving misogynists not to mention his choice for Sec. of Defense. Trump has tokenism with his CoS and Noehm but they won't last.
Well, at least you can take comfort in the fact that the nominee for Attorney General seems to like women.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.
In what world is a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon a better candidate?
It’s not exactly secret that women have to be near perfect to secure the same job an average man has access to.
This...is not true. Why do you keep saying this?
Anonymous wrote:No, women need to be at home taking care of their children instead of Day Care strangers.Anonymous wrote:More women need to stay in the workforce so that it’s easier for all of us to fight for equal rights and work life balance. But the opposite will happen because of cultural forces and the trump administration—I’m sure Vance will find a way to stick it to working women.
And women already have equal rights, what feminist hags are running their stupid loud mouths about are having “special rights” where having a vagina automatically gets you hired for a management or CEO position.
Trump and Vance will hopefully bring in more merit-based hiring in the govt instead of Diversity/DEI quota hires.
Anonymous wrote:No, women need to be at home taking care of their children instead of Day Care strangers.Anonymous wrote:More women need to stay in the workforce so that it’s easier for all of us to fight for equal rights and work life balance. But the opposite will happen because of cultural forces and the trump administration—I’m sure Vance will find a way to stick it to working women.
And women already have equal rights, what feminist hags are running their stupid loud mouths about are having “special rights” where having a vagina automatically gets you hired for a management or CEO position.
Trump and Vance will hopefully bring in more merit-based hiring in the govt instead of Diversity/DEI quota hires.