Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Newsom would have agreed to go on Rogan in a flash.

Harris agreed to go on Rogan.

Rogan is the one having cold feet. It's already been shown and discussed here. Keep up.

Newsom would have agreed to do it in Rogan's studio, for three hours, as is customary. Newsom would have recognized it as the opportunity that it is and jumped at the chance and not come up with reasons to decline.

Sure because Newsom isn't anywhere near as busy out pounding the campaign trails with events in multiple states every day.

If Newsom was the nominee, he would be pounding the campaign trails and doing Rogan for 3 hours in Rogan's studio, which is what someone who wants to win would do.

And Rogan would trot out tons of screengrabs about the homeless-industrial complex AND the RAIL FAIL just as appetizers.

Rogan would have offered a fair interview as he has with the other candidates. Rogan hasn't done gotchas with them. He gives them a chance to detail their policies, something which Newsom would have done and Harris needs to do.

Harris has her policies laid out on her website. Trump has Project 2025 which says the military will be launched against citizens. He can’t even come up with his own policies. How could be lead anyone anywhere?

I want Harris policies and not Trump “policies.”

But does she know what her policies are as outlined on her website? In the Fox interview, she told viewers to read her website. Not helpful. A candidate needs to be able to clearly articulate their policies to a general audience on their own, not referring people to a website. That is why a Rogan interview could be helpful to her candidacy, allowing her to put her policies into clear and plain English for the listener. That is, if she can do that.

She outlined a number of her policies yet again tonight during her rally.

I really wish you people would actually bother to try to actually know what you're talking about and have honest conversations rather than just spewing empty nonsense like this.

OMG - right back at you, in spades. Especially when it comes to the idiotic claim that Project 2025 has anything to do with Trump or his agenda.
DP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Newsom would have agreed to go on Rogan in a flash.

Harris agreed to go on Rogan.

Rogan is the one having cold feet. It's already been shown and discussed here. Keep up.

Newsom would have agreed to do it in Rogan's studio, for three hours, as is customary. Newsom would have recognized it as the opportunity that it is and jumped at the chance and not come up with reasons to decline.

Sure because Newsom isn't anywhere near as busy out pounding the campaign trails with events in multiple states every day.

If Newsom was the nominee, he would be pounding the campaign trails and doing Rogan for 3 hours in Rogan's studio, which is what someone who wants to win would do.

And Rogan would trot out tons of screengrabs about the homeless-industrial complex AND the RAIL FAIL just as appetizers.

Rogan would have offered a fair interview as he has with the other candidates. Rogan hasn't done gotchas with them. He gives them a chance to detail their policies, something which Newsom would have done and Harris needs to do.

Harris has her policies laid out on her website. Trump has Project 2025 which says the military will be launched against citizens. He can’t even come up with his own policies. How could be lead anyone anywhere?

I want Harris policies and not Trump “policies.”

But does she know what her policies are as outlined on her website? In the Fox interview, she told viewers to read her website. Not helpful. A candidate needs to be able to clearly articulate their policies to a general audience on their own, not referring people to a website. That is why a Rogan interview could be helpful to her candidacy, allowing her to put her policies into clear and plain English for the listener. That is, if she can do that.

She outlined a number of her policies yet again tonight during her rally.

I really wish you people would actually bother to try to actually know what you're talking about and have honest conversations rather than just spewing empty nonsense like this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Newsom would have agreed to go on Rogan in a flash.

Harris agreed to go on Rogan.

Rogan is the one having cold feet. It's already been shown and discussed here. Keep up.

Newsom would have agreed to do it in Rogan's studio, for three hours, as is customary. Newsom would have recognized it as the opportunity that it is and jumped at the chance and not come up with reasons to decline.

Sure because Newsom isn't anywhere near as busy out pounding the campaign trails with events in multiple states every day.

If Newsom was the nominee, he would be pounding the campaign trails and doing Rogan for 3 hours in Rogan's studio, which is what someone who wants to win would do.

And Rogan would trot out tons of screengrabs about the homeless-industrial complex AND the RAIL FAIL just as appetizers.

Rogan would have offered a fair interview as he has with the other candidates. Rogan hasn't done gotchas with them. He gives them a chance to detail their policies, something which Newsom would have done and Harris needs to do.

Harris has her policies laid out on her website. Trump has Project 2025 which says the military will be launched against citizens. He can’t even come up with his own policies. How could be lead anyone anywhere?

I want Harris policies and not Trump “policies.”

But does she know what her policies are as outlined on her website? In the Fox interview, she told viewers to read her website. Not helpful. A candidate needs to be able to clearly articulate their policies to a general audience on their own, not referring people to a website. That is why a Rogan interview could be helpful to her candidacy, allowing her to put her policies into clear and plain English for the listener. That is, if she can do that.

She outlined a number of her policies yet again tonight during her rally.

I really wish you people would actually bother to try to actually know what you're talking about and have honest conversations rather than just spewing empty nonsense like this.

Anonymous wrote:Trump admitted his biggest mistake and regret during the podcast. Kamala said she hasn’t made any mistakes. That’s very telling of both of their character and thoughtfulness. Mistakes are always made and lessons are always there to learn if you’re thoughtful and insightful enough to analyze them.

Trump is a people watcher, a hard negotiator/tough guy, and relationship builder but it’s that kind of person who can bring peace through strength. He’s a fatherly figure for the US

Anonymous wrote:It’s one thing to want to ensure election integrity, but for Trump to cause a vast group of people to believe that the only way he can lose is if the Democrats steal the election is not someone who truly believes in democracy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Newsom would have agreed to go on Rogan in a flash.

Harris agreed to go on Rogan.

Rogan is the one having cold feet. It's already been shown and discussed here. Keep up.

Newsom would have agreed to do it in Rogan's studio, for three hours, as is customary. Newsom would have recognized it as the opportunity that it is and jumped at the chance and not come up with reasons to decline.

Sure because Newsom isn't anywhere near as busy out pounding the campaign trails with events in multiple states every day.

If Newsom was the nominee, he would be pounding the campaign trails and doing Rogan for 3 hours in Rogan's studio, which is what someone who wants to win would do.

And Rogan would trot out tons of screengrabs about the homeless-industrial complex AND the RAIL FAIL just as appetizers.

Rogan would have offered a fair interview as he has with the other candidates. Rogan hasn't done gotchas with them. He gives them a chance to detail their policies, something which Newsom would have done and Harris needs to do.

Harris has her policies laid out on her website. Trump has Project 2025 which says the military will be launched against citizens. He can’t even come up with his own policies. How could be lead anyone anywhere?

I want Harris policies and not Trump “policies.”

But does she know what her policies are as outlined on her website? In the Fox interview, she told viewers to read her website. Not helpful. A candidate needs to be able to clearly articulate their policies to a general audience on their own, not referring people to a website. That is why a Rogan interview could be helpful to her candidacy, allowing her to put her policies into clear and plain English for the listener. That is, if she can do that.

Anonymous wrote:Trump admitted his biggest mistake and regret during the podcast. Kamala said she hasn’t made any mistakes. That’s very telling of both of their character and thoughtfulness. Mistakes are always made and lessons are always there to learn if you’re thoughtful and insightful enough to analyze them.

Trump is a people watcher, a hard negotiator/tough guy, and relationship builder but it’s that kind of person who can bring peace through strength. He’s a fatherly figure for the US

Anonymous wrote:Trump admitted his biggest mistake and regret during the podcast. Kamala said she hasn’t made any mistakes. That’s very telling of both of their character and thoughtfulness. Mistakes are always made and lessons are always there to learn if you’re thoughtful and insightful enough to analyze them.

Trump is a people watcher, a hard negotiator/tough guy, and relationship builder but it’s that kind of person who can bring peace through strength. He’s a fatherly figure for the US

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Newsom would have agreed to go on Rogan in a flash.

Harris agreed to go on Rogan.

Rogan is the one having cold feet. It's already been shown and discussed here. Keep up.

Newsom would have agreed to do it in Rogan's studio, for three hours, as is customary. Newsom would have recognized it as the opportunity that it is and jumped at the chance and not come up with reasons to decline.

Sure because Newsom isn't anywhere near as busy out pounding the campaign trails with events in multiple states every day.

If Newsom was the nominee, he would be pounding the campaign trails and doing Rogan for 3 hours in Rogan's studio, which is what someone who wants to win would do.

And Rogan would trot out tons of screengrabs about the homeless-industrial complex AND the RAIL FAIL just as appetizers.

Rogan would have offered a fair interview as he has with the other candidates. Rogan hasn't done gotchas with them. He gives them a chance to detail their policies, something which Newsom would have done and Harris needs to do.

Harris has her policies laid out on her website. Trump has Project 2025 which says the military will be launched against citizens. He can’t even come up with his own policies. How could be lead anyone anywhere?

I want Harris policies and not Trump “policies.”

But does she know what her policies are as outlined on her website? In the Fox interview, she told viewers to read her website. Not helpful. A candidate needs to be able to clearly articulate their policies to a general audience on their own, not referring people to a website. That is why a Rogan interview could be helpful to her candidacy, allowing her to put her policies into clear and plain English for the listener. That is, if she can do that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Newsom would have agreed to go on Rogan in a flash.

Harris agreed to go on Rogan.

Rogan is the one having cold feet. It's already been shown and discussed here. Keep up.

Newsom would have agreed to do it in Rogan's studio, for three hours, as is customary. Newsom would have recognized it as the opportunity that it is and jumped at the chance and not come up with reasons to decline.

Sure because Newsom isn't anywhere near as busy out pounding the campaign trails with events in multiple states every day.

If Newsom was the nominee, he would be pounding the campaign trails and doing Rogan for 3 hours in Rogan's studio, which is what someone who wants to win would do.

And Rogan would trot out tons of screengrabs about the homeless-industrial complex AND the RAIL FAIL just as appetizers.

Rogan would have offered a fair interview as he has with the other candidates. Rogan hasn't done gotchas with them. He gives them a chance to detail their policies, something which Newsom would have done and Harris needs to do.

Harris has her policies laid out on her website. Trump has Project 2025 which says the military will be launched against citizens. He can’t even come up with his own policies. How could be lead anyone anywhere?

I want Harris policies and not Trump “policies.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised Trump was such a student of history. He obviously knew what he was talking about especially President McKinley being the tarriff president and getting assassinated for it and he said a mouthful when he said only consequential presidents get assassinated.

It was obvious he knew more about the JFK file but didn’t want to say. When he said now it would be OK because the person is no longer alive, I believe he was implying Bush Sr. He was long believed to have taken a part in the assassination and rumored to be friends with both Ronald Reagan and JFK’s shooters.

Was very sad to hear about Iraq. He was right to say that was a stupid mistake but it is impressive he and the real generals beat ISIS in a few weeks.

He was 100% right that tarriffs can replace income tax in the US.

In my opinion, the IRS and Fed Reserve Bank were bad creations and not want the founding fathers ever wanted. They wanted a protectionist /isolationist country that manufactures things and produces its own oil and natural gas and is self sufficient.

+1 to all of this. I really enjoyed the interview and thought he sounded great. His explanation about the weave made me laugh. Basically, you gotta trust the process!

He was unfocused, babbling, rambling like my grandfather. He also had dementia.

I see why Trump has many lawyers and professors in his family. They have the gift of gab but he certainly exudes a crude Queens /New Yorker spin on his conversation which may be seen as alarming or rude to other parts of the country

It’s too bad he didn’t write a post presidential memoir yet. I want to read the burn book and I don’t think he’d lie in it

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised Trump was such a student of history. He obviously knew what he was talking about especially President McKinley being the tarriff president and getting assassinated for it and he said a mouthful when he said only consequential presidents get assassinated.

It was obvious he knew more about the JFK file but didn’t want to say. When he said now it would be OK because the person is no longer alive, I believe he was implying Bush Sr. He was long believed to have taken a part in the assassination and rumored to be friends with both Ronald Reagan and JFK’s shooters.

Was very sad to hear about Iraq. He was right to say that was a stupid mistake but it is impressive he and the real generals beat ISIS in a few weeks.

He was 100% right that tarriffs can replace income tax in the US.

In my opinion, the IRS and Fed Reserve Bank were bad creations and not want the founding fathers ever wanted. They wanted a protectionist /isolationist country that manufactures things and produces its own oil and natural gas and is self sufficient.

+1 to all of this. I really enjoyed the interview and thought he sounded great. His explanation about the weave made me laugh. Basically, you gotta trust the process!

He was unfocused, babbling, rambling like my grandfather. He also had dementia.