Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm confused by the people who keep asking about a specific player. Meaning it has been 30 days in a process that can take a year. Maybe she is weighing different aspects of the school etc. I'm not sure that I would rush such an important decision if I was her. The girls that go fast are likely committing to one of their top choices so the decision is easy. If you are choosing between a handful of options it is not easy.
It is all because there are some people who have commented that they have the opinion that the other cap goalie who has committed already is the better player. Some people either can't handle that someone would dare to have a different opinion on who they think is the best player, or they are incapable of separating the play on the field from a person and want to take it as a personal assault on the girl which it's not.
Anonymous wrote:I'm confused by the people who keep asking about a specific player. Meaning it has been 30 days in a process that can take a year. Maybe she is weighing different aspects of the school etc. I'm not sure that I would rush such an important decision if I was her. The girls that go fast are likely committing to one of their top choices so the decision is easy. If you are choosing between a handful of options it is not easy.
Anonymous wrote:I'm confused by the people who keep asking about a specific player. Meaning it has been 30 days in a process that can take a year. Maybe she is weighing different aspects of the school etc. I'm not sure that I would rush such an important decision if I was her. The girls that go fast are likely committing to one of their top choices so the decision is easy. If you are choosing between a handful of options it is not easy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The original rosters of the two Cap ‘25 teams weren’t good. Cap made changes to fix them and both teams are now looking great. [/quotefix
Fix them? No. The girlls moved up and down were on the margins not change makers. The one new player
From outside the club also was not a change maker.
Bill and Bryan had their favorites and less favorites and moved girls accordingly. Not everyone agreed the moves were the right ones but politics play out on the field.
If there was a performance change between freshman year and sophomore year by the team it was because they started to gel as a team not due to the player changes. Same true for orange. Any new players were not strong additions.
Area experts, not parents, agree the original rosters were wrong. Sorry.
Correct. Kudos to Capital for making the necessary changes and adding the right players to Blue . Five new players on Blue between 9th and 10th grade. No question they became a stronger unit!
Anonymous wrote:This doesn’t even make sense
And again. Isn’t the title of this thread about commitments?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The original rosters of the two Cap ‘25 teams weren’t good. Cap made changes to fix them and both teams are now looking great. [/quotefix
Fix them? No. The girlls moved up and down were on the margins not change makers. The one new player
From outside the club also was not a change maker.
Bill and Bryan had their favorites and less favorites and moved girls accordingly. Not everyone agreed the moves were the right ones but politics play out on the field.
If there was a performance change between freshman year and sophomore year by the team it was because they started to gel as a team not due to the player changes. Same true for orange. Any new players were not strong additions.
Area experts, not parents, agree the original rosters were wrong. Sorry.
Anonymous wrote:The original rosters of the two Cap ‘25 teams weren’t good. Cap made changes to fix them and both teams are now looking great. [/quotefix
Fix them? No. The girlls moved up and down were on the margins not change makers. The one new player
From outside the club also was not a change maker.
Bill and Bryan had their favorites and less favorites and moved girls accordingly. Not everyone agreed the moves were the right ones but politics play out on the field.
If there was a performance change between freshman year and sophomore year by the team it was because they started to gel as a team not due to the player changes. Same true for orange. Any new players were not strong additions.
Anonymous wrote:The original rosters of the two Cap ‘25 teams weren’t good. Cap made changes to fix them and both teams are now looking great.
Anonymous wrote:A ranking is only one consideration. Holy Cross is #66. ASU #76. Many things to consider.