Anonymous wrote:This bums me out so much. I really want kids more than anything, but I have a combination fertility issues and martial issues (exacerbated by the fertility issues) at age 36, and I just don't think it's happening for me.
While I am grieving that kids just might not be in the cards for me, my parents have been nothing but supportive and reminded me that I have inherent worth regardless of whether I procreate or not. That while they would love to be grandparents, it's not an obligation or duty, and that I am enough and that I will be ok even if it never happens for me and that I have so many other things going for me in my life. That they are there for me and there to support me. My mom even is flying out to be with me when I freeze my eggs.
If they took the attitude of this thread, it would make this time of my life SO much harder.
Anonymous wrote:This is the thing: I could not have bio kids, and my parents didn't consider adopted kids "real grandchildren." It's insane.
Anonymous wrote:Bob Barker even though he lived till 99 will she on be forgotten as no kids.
His house, money, royalties will be divided up
Among strangers
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:my friend had 5 kids, only ONE was there every weekend I visited her in the nursing home that year before she passed and all were in driving distance, like 30 minutes....I just assumed the other kids came during the week, well I ran into one of her friends who was there during the week and only ONE was there for her. Having kids to get to ANY end result....having grands, or someone to take care of you as you age is NEVER guaranteed, NEVER.
I play the lottery and hope for the best so to speak. If I had zero kids I would definitely not have a chance.
As for them visiting, well the smart idea is to try to keep them close (don’t live in the boonies!) and help them, hoping they would return the favor.
Anonymous wrote:Nieces and nephews really don’t mean much to me. First the ones on spouse side I have zero genetic connection.
My siblings kids have 50 percent whatever schmuck they married mixed in.
Anonymous wrote:Don’t want to end up like Sandra Bullock.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The biological point of having children is reproduction of your genes. You can come up with some modern take about fulfillment and such, but life got to this point with selfish genes. The desire for grandchildren is natural and built in as a baseline human drive selected by billions of years of evolution. Any parent who claims they would not be disappointed that their genes die out two generations down the line is kidding themselves.
I don’t care if my genes die out. I’m not royalty.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a good friend who was adopted from a third world country (not due to infertility), while her younger brother was born to their parents. He is a wildly successful tall blonde white dude who married young to a wife who stays home to raise their three beautiful kids. My friend went to college, works and functions fine, but she's not white and had some problems related to being adopted by a wealthy white family in a predominately white community. Her parents gave her brother a huge sum of money when he married and bought a home. She rents. Her parents will not help her buy an apartment. Her parents plan her a pittance while her brother will receive the bulk of their estate.
They WANTED her. They planned to adopt their first child when they married. They raised her. And it's very likely in part due to the fact that she was adopted that her life has not gone quite as perfectly as her brother's. She's not even estranged from the family! She sees her parents regularly. But they're punishing her for not marrying and having children, things that she certainly wanted but did not have the luck of getting.
Sorry, but I think that's pretty messed up. I hope her parents change their mind before they die.
This is so sad.
I'm glad my parents loved me even though I wasn't able to have much wanted children. Sadly, they would have hated it had we adopted children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All this talk about the world failing is baffling to me. Are things any worse now than they were when people owned other humans as property? Are things worse now than they were during the world wars?
The world was always a shitty place. It's no worse than it was I'm the past.
Sure, it’s always been a shitty place but women have more independence and control over their own bodies, and societal pressure to birth children has decreased. It’s not surprising that women who don’t want kids choose not to have them now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
However, I agree with your greater point. What's the point if my line ends?
Are you the Queen of England or something? Get over yourself.
+1! All this talk about “lines” is so ridiculous. You’re not a Lannister or royalty.
Anonymous wrote:Feeling really bad for my gay brother right now. But he doesn't read DCUM so I guess it's fine.
Anonymous wrote:my friend had 5 kids, only ONE was there every weekend I visited her in the nursing home that year before she passed and all were in driving distance, like 30 minutes....I just assumed the other kids came during the week, well I ran into one of her friends who was there during the week and only ONE was there for her. Having kids to get to ANY end result....having grands, or someone to take care of you as you age is NEVER guaranteed, NEVER.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I find all of the posts from people who are against having kids (as opposed to people who wanted kids but couldn't have them for whatever reason) pretty fascinating. I wonder what it is about our culture that makes people so anti-children and why some families seem to "die out" so to speak while other families are seemingly immune and raise kids who want to have their own kids. Religiosity is obviously part of it, but I don't think that tells the whole story.
My mom is a evangelical christian fundie, had 6 kids, of her 6 kids, #1 had 3, #2 had 3, #3-6 zero each. #2 might have one more (embryos on ice so she has options), #3-6 don't look like they will be having kids, one of them is a woman already wrong side of 35, another is a woman approaching it. MIL had 4 kids, #1 had 3 kids, #2 1 kid, #3-4 zero kids (one has a vasectomy)
Honestly, it is pretty scary, I look around and see that repeated over and over in families I know. It's one thing for birth rates to settle around 1.5, but is seems like <1 is in the near future. Forget about paying for elderly pensions, there may be a struggle to find people to pick up garbage and keep the electricity on. It's happening even in places like Afghanistan. Alot of Muslim gulf states are already below replacement. South Korea is especially scary and there is no reason to think that is not the future everywhere.