Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The current state of MCPS would actually be fine if it didn’t cost 3 billion plus a YEAR and much of it in things that don’t affect current classroom - defined (overly generous) pensions and (overly generous) healthcare, largely for their retirees. I think if this place offered the same (low) quality of school at 1/2 property tax DCUM wouldn’t like the ego hit but would be fine with it — because they would have more money for Larlo’s supplementation.
I hate how teachers and retired teachers insist on compensation and health insurance coverage. The nerve of 'em!
/s
It’s mostly admin and you know it.
It's mostly teachers and you know it. MCPS has:
13,994 professional (includes teachers) - 55.5%
9,741 supporting services - 38.6%
755 people in business operations/administrative - 3.0%
99 administrative - 0.4%
https://www2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/about/
That tells me nothing about how expenses are divided up. Please tell me you don’t teach.
That tells you who the employees are. When you're complaining about compensation, pensions, and health insurance, you're complaining about funding for people. Well, that's who the people are: 55.5% professional (including teachers), 38.6% supporting services, 3.0% business operations/administrative, 0.4% administrative.
I want to know who gets the bulk of the compensation funds. Your breakdown doesn’t tell me that.
This is basic stuff.
Of course it does. The bulk of the compensation funds goes to the bulk of the employees, which is the professional (including teachers) staff. Would you think the bulk of the compensation funds (assuming bulk = >50%) goes to 0.4% of the employees?
But you don't have to take my word for it! You can look at the MCPS operating budget tables. For positions, in dollars, for FY 2022 actual:
Professional (including teachers): $1,204,487,534 (69.8%)
Supporting services: $399,532,368 (23.2%)
Business/Operations Admin: $9,955,354 (0.6%)
Administrative: $111,473,903 (6.5%)
Total: $1,725,449,159
https://www2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/siteassets/district/departments/budget/fy2024/fy2024_summarybudget_final.pdf
That proves my point. Admin is 0.4% of MCPS employees and yet receives 6.5% of the compensation budget.
Anonymous wrote:Just because the school in your hood declined do not speak for all of us in MoCo. Our school is awesome and our kids are awesome. Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The current state of MCPS would actually be fine if it didn’t cost 3 billion plus a YEAR and much of it in things that don’t affect current classroom - defined (overly generous) pensions and (overly generous) healthcare, largely for their retirees. I think if this place offered the same (low) quality of school at 1/2 property tax DCUM wouldn’t like the ego hit but would be fine with it — because they would have more money for Larlo’s supplementation.
I hate how teachers and retired teachers insist on compensation and health insurance coverage. The nerve of 'em!
/s
It’s mostly admin and you know it.
It's mostly teachers and you know it. MCPS has:
13,994 professional (includes teachers) - 55.5%
9,741 supporting services - 38.6%
755 people in business operations/administrative - 3.0%
99 administrative - 0.4%
https://www2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/about/
That tells me nothing about how expenses are divided up. Please tell me you don’t teach.
That tells you who the employees are. When you're complaining about compensation, pensions, and health insurance, you're complaining about funding for people. Well, that's who the people are: 55.5% professional (including teachers), 38.6% supporting services, 3.0% business operations/administrative, 0.4% administrative.
I want to know who gets the bulk of the compensation funds. Your breakdown doesn’t tell me that.
This is basic stuff.
Of course it does. The bulk of the compensation funds goes to the bulk of the employees, which is the professional (including teachers) staff. Would you think the bulk of the compensation funds (assuming bulk = >50%) goes to 0.4% of the employees?
But you don't have to take my word for it! You can look at the MCPS operating budget tables. For positions, in dollars, for FY 2022 actual:
Professional (including teachers): $1,204,487,534 (69.8%)
Supporting services: $399,532,368 (23.2%)
Business/Operations Admin: $9,955,354 (0.6%)
Administrative: $111,473,903 (6.5%)
Total: $1,725,449,159
https://www2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/siteassets/district/departments/budget/fy2024/fy2024_summarybudget_final.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The current state of MCPS would actually be fine if it didn’t cost 3 billion plus a YEAR and much of it in things that don’t affect current classroom - defined (overly generous) pensions and (overly generous) healthcare, largely for their retirees. I think if this place offered the same (low) quality of school at 1/2 property tax DCUM wouldn’t like the ego hit but would be fine with it — because they would have more money for Larlo’s supplementation.
I hate how teachers and retired teachers insist on compensation and health insurance coverage. The nerve of 'em!
/s
It’s mostly admin and you know it.
It's mostly teachers and you know it. MCPS has:
13,994 professional (includes teachers) - 55.5%
9,741 supporting services - 38.6%
755 people in business operations/administrative - 3.0%
99 administrative - 0.4%
https://www2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/about/
That tells me nothing about how expenses are divided up. Please tell me you don’t teach.
That tells you who the employees are. When you're complaining about compensation, pensions, and health insurance, you're complaining about funding for people. Well, that's who the people are: 55.5% professional (including teachers), 38.6% supporting services, 3.0% business operations/administrative, 0.4% administrative.
I want to know who gets the bulk of the compensation funds. Your breakdown doesn’t tell me that.
This is basic stuff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work in a Title One elementary school in MCPS. Our behaviors are off the charts this year. I honestly don't know how our admin continues to come to work each day. They constantly have kids in their offices. Even our staff development teacher, reading specialist, math coach AND both counselors are constantly with kids displaying behavior issues or eloping class. Admin can't suspend kids for running the halls, even in elementary school. I feel bad for our core team above because they can't do their actual jobs as they basically play security all day. I have some difficult kids but at least I can close my classroom door and ignore the chaos that's unfolding in rooms across the school.
Parents need to wake up and start parenting their kids rather than ignoring them on their phones or trying to be their friend. I applaud all of you who are trying your best to do right by your kids. Raise hell with the county council and board of ed. Your neighborhood school's principal can't do anything to make the changes we need to see.
You all need to work with the parents and let them know what's going on and have parents come in and volunteer and help vs. complaining. This isn't something new. Even before covid, may schools were closed to parents and yet, the teachers and admin complained bitterly about the parents. We cannot help if we don't know what's going on. Kids behave differently so they may be behaving at home and not school so if that's the situation it's on the teachers to communicate. We'd email the teachers and rarely get a response back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The current state of MCPS would actually be fine if it didn’t cost 3 billion plus a YEAR and much of it in things that don’t affect current classroom - defined (overly generous) pensions and (overly generous) healthcare, largely for their retirees. I think if this place offered the same (low) quality of school at 1/2 property tax DCUM wouldn’t like the ego hit but would be fine with it — because they would have more money for Larlo’s supplementation.
I hate how teachers and retired teachers insist on compensation and health insurance coverage. The nerve of 'em!
/s
It’s mostly admin and you know it.
It's mostly teachers and you know it. MCPS has:
13,994 professional (includes teachers) - 55.5%
9,741 supporting services - 38.6%
755 people in business operations/administrative - 3.0%
99 administrative - 0.4%
https://www2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/about/
That tells me nothing about how expenses are divided up. Please tell me you don’t teach.
That tells you who the employees are. When you're complaining about compensation, pensions, and health insurance, you're complaining about funding for people. Well, that's who the people are: 55.5% professional (including teachers), 38.6% supporting services, 3.0% business operations/administrative, 0.4% administrative.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the people who think mcps is fine are more likely to be: parents of typical kids, parents in w clusters, parents who don't know any better for various reasons, and parents who are coming from even worse school systems.
I think the people who think MCPS is fine are more likely to be:
1. Parents of neurotypical kids
2. Parents who are able to keep things in perspective
Does MCPS have problems? Yes. Do I have the time and energy to waste on expecting perfection from MCPS? No. But you do you.
+1. I add :
1. People capable of doing math to realize what it would take to get what parents and politicians expect/say vs what they are willing to fund
2. People who recognize it could be worse(much worse)
3. People who know DCUM complaints don’t equal the greater population of MoCo. And if it does, we’d see much greater parental involvement in schools, community and BOE election and oversight.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The current state of MCPS would actually be fine if it didn’t cost 3 billion plus a YEAR and much of it in things that don’t affect current classroom - defined (overly generous) pensions and (overly generous) healthcare, largely for their retirees. I think if this place offered the same (low) quality of school at 1/2 property tax DCUM wouldn’t like the ego hit but would be fine with it — because they would have more money for Larlo’s supplementation.
I hate how teachers and retired teachers insist on compensation and health insurance coverage. The nerve of 'em!
/s
It’s mostly admin and you know it.
It's mostly teachers and you know it. MCPS has:
13,994 professional (includes teachers) - 55.5%
9,741 supporting services - 38.6%
755 people in business operations/administrative - 3.0%
99 administrative - 0.4%
https://www2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/about/
That tells me nothing about how expenses are divided up. Please tell me you don’t teach.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the people who think mcps is fine are more likely to be: parents of typical kids, parents in w clusters, parents who don't know any better for various reasons, and parents who are coming from even worse school systems.
I think the people who think MCPS is fine are more likely to be:
1. Parents of neurotypical kids
2. Parents who are able to keep things in perspective
Does MCPS have problems? Yes. Do I have the time and energy to waste on expecting perfection from MCPS? No. But you do you.
+1. I add :
1. People capable of doing math to realize what it would take to get what parents and politicians expect/say vs what they are willing to fund
2. People who recognize it could be worse(much worse)
3. People who know DCUM complaints don’t equal the greater population of MoCo. And if it does, we’d see much greater parental involvement in schools, community and BOE election and oversight.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the people who think mcps is fine are more likely to be: parents of typical kids, parents in w clusters, parents who don't know any better for various reasons, and parents who are coming from even worse school systems.
I think the people who think MCPS is fine are more likely to be:
1. Parents of neurotypical kids
2. Parents who are able to keep things in perspective
Does MCPS have problems? Yes. Do I have the time and energy to waste on expecting perfection from MCPS? No. But you do you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The current state of MCPS would actually be fine if it didn’t cost 3 billion plus a YEAR and much of it in things that don’t affect current classroom - defined (overly generous) pensions and (overly generous) healthcare, largely for their retirees. I think if this place offered the same (low) quality of school at 1/2 property tax DCUM wouldn’t like the ego hit but would be fine with it — because they would have more money for Larlo’s supplementation.
I hate how teachers and retired teachers insist on compensation and health insurance coverage. The nerve of 'em!
/s
It’s mostly admin and you know it.
It's mostly teachers and you know it. MCPS has:
13,994 professional (includes teachers) - 55.5%
9,741 supporting services - 38.6%
755 people in business operations/administrative - 3.0%
99 administrative - 0.4%
https://www2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/about/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The current state of MCPS would actually be fine if it didn’t cost 3 billion plus a YEAR and much of it in things that don’t affect current classroom - defined (overly generous) pensions and (overly generous) healthcare, largely for their retirees. I think if this place offered the same (low) quality of school at 1/2 property tax DCUM wouldn’t like the ego hit but would be fine with it — because they would have more money for Larlo’s supplementation.
I hate how teachers and retired teachers insist on compensation and health insurance coverage. The nerve of 'em!
/s
It’s mostly admin and you know it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The current state of MCPS would actually be fine if it didn’t cost 3 billion plus a YEAR and much of it in things that don’t affect current classroom - defined (overly generous) pensions and (overly generous) healthcare, largely for their retirees. I think if this place offered the same (low) quality of school at 1/2 property tax DCUM wouldn’t like the ego hit but would be fine with it — because they would have more money for Larlo’s supplementation.
I hate how teachers and retired teachers insist on compensation and health insurance coverage. The nerve of 'em!
/s
Anonymous wrote:The current state of MCPS would actually be fine if it didn’t cost 3 billion plus a YEAR and much of it in things that don’t affect current classroom - defined (overly generous) pensions and (overly generous) healthcare, largely for their retirees. I think if this place offered the same (low) quality of school at 1/2 property tax DCUM wouldn’t like the ego hit but would be fine with it — because they would have more money for Larlo’s supplementation.