Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chicago is next and after that NYC. Ironically it's all Dem run cities (I'm not GOP). Admittedly, something's wrong with the Dem cities..
big cities with black Dem mayors are not so soft on crime because they know that the people hurt most by these criminals are black people. Other than the mayor of Chicago, none of these black mayors are progressives. It's the white mayors and their white savior complex that's driving cities like SF to the ground.
https://news.yahoo.com/black-mayors-are-fighting-to-save-americas-biggest-cities-145527068.html
So.... what are you saying? It's only the white San Francisco mayors that are to blame?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chicago is next and after that NYC. Ironically it's all Dem run cities (I'm not GOP). Admittedly, something's wrong with the Dem cities..
big cities with black Dem mayors are not so soft on crime because they know that the people hurt most by these criminals are black people. Other than the mayor of Chicago, none of these black mayors are progressives. It's the white mayors and their white savior complex that's driving cities like SF to the ground.
https://news.yahoo.com/black-mayors-are-fighting-to-save-americas-biggest-cities-145527068.html
So.... what are you saying? It's only the white San Francisco mayors that are to blame?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This problem started back when Reagan decided to get people out of mental institutions. They all went to the streets. I remember it well as I was starting a career in Chicago. Most Americans had never heard the word "homeless" before that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_Health_Systems_Act_of_1980
Back when all the esteemed psychiatrists advised us that these people would be fine because of medications and should live freely. Very sadly, their lives would be much better if they were taken care of through required long-term hospitalization or group homes, rather than living on the streets.
Yup, it's always 'Reagan's fault!' when there were so many progressives back then foaming at the mouth that it was cruel and inhumane to lockup people with mental problems in govt institutions. Liberals all told us they would be fine living in the world on their own.
1981 President Reagan repeals Carter’s legislation with the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. This pushes the responsibility of mentally ill patients back to the states. The legislation creates block grants for the states, but federal spending on mental illness declines.
Gump’s, which sells luxury furnishings and jewelry, was acquired by Chachas after the retailer filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2018. The high-end retailer, founded in San Francisco in 1861 and born out of the famed California gold rush, has only one physical location, which is one block from the city’s Union Square.
“The ramifications of Covid policies advising people to abandon their offices are only beginning to be understood. Equally devastating have been a litany of destructive San Francisco strategies, including allowing the homeless to occupy our sidewalks, to openly distribute and use illegal drugs, to harass the public and to defile the city’s streets,” he wrote.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Chicago is next and after that NYC. Ironically it's all Dem run cities (I'm not GOP). Admittedly, something's wrong with the Dem cities..
big cities with black Dem mayors are not so soft on crime because they know that the people hurt most by these criminals are black people. Other than the mayor of Chicago, none of these black mayors are progressives. It's the white mayors and their white savior complex that's driving cities like SF to the ground.
https://news.yahoo.com/black-mayors-are-fighting-to-save-americas-biggest-cities-145527068.html
Anonymous wrote:Chicago is next and after that NYC. Ironically it's all Dem run cities (I'm not GOP). Admittedly, something's wrong with the Dem cities..
Anonymous wrote:It's remarkable how quickly this has all happened. 7 years ago San Francisco and Portland were great cities. Safe. Fun. Great quality of life. Awesome restaurants. Wonderful natural locations. And now both places are straight out of The Walking Dead.
In retrospect, refusing to prosecute criminals and tolerating open air drug markets - first for heroin, now for fentanyl - were terrible approaches to urban life. Until that changes, two of the best cities in America are going to continue to spiral. There needs to be a tough on crime approach going forward. And the addicts need to be given a choice. Treatment or jail. But you can't live and use on the sidewalks anymore.
Unfortunately, I don't see anything changing.
Anonymous wrote:It's remarkable how quickly this has all happened. 7 years ago San Francisco and Portland were great cities. Safe. Fun. Great quality of life. Awesome restaurants. Wonderful natural locations. And now both places are straight out of The Walking Dead.
In retrospect, refusing to prosecute criminals and tolerating open air drug markets - first for heroin, now for fentanyl - were terrible approaches to urban life. Until that changes, two of the best cities in America are going to continue to spiral. There needs to be a tough on crime approach going forward. And the addicts need to be given a choice. Treatment or jail. But you can't live and use on the sidewalks anymore.
Unfortunately, I don't see anything changing.
Anonymous wrote:Ok, it’s official. San Francisco is an unsafe disaster of crime and drugs. Where is the mayor? Where is the Governor? How could they let this happen.
Federal Employees are now advised Not To Go To Work and the Pelosi federal building in downtown San Fran is it is too Unsafe due to crime and drugs!!!!!! So if it’s not safe for Federal Employees to go to work in person, how is it safe for any resident??
https://www.newsweek.com/san-francisco-federal-workers-told-work-remotely-drug-crime-1819791?amp=1