Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If that hoe becomes queen, then I will throw my support behind British republicans and build a shrine to Oliver Cromwell. I'll post pictures of my Cromwell shrine on Instagram everyday and tag Charles and Camilla.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Camilla triggers people because the mistress won and the poor wronged spouse ended up dying young. There is a sense of injustice about the whole situation and Camilla does always look like the proverbial cat who got the cream.

I think you're partly right. People forget how unstable she acted. The interviews telling the press about Charles and Camilla and releasing info. for pay back at the monarchy. She became her own worse enemy. She was a very needy person who had countless affairs with other creeps who didn't care she was a married princess. Early on she should have let Charles spend time with Camilla. In fact be happy he was out of her hair, and realized she had nothing in common with him. Whereby Camilla did. Enjoyed the status of her position, and stayed married. Charles would have agreed to that. Her constant need to outdo him, and embarrass the family was the beginning of the end for her. Then she ends up with another creep (cheater) who was suppose to be married in a few days to another woman. And she's in a speeding car with idiots while not wearing a seat belt . Plus she should have had her own security detail, but again another one of her poor judgement calls.

She thought happiness was with other men instead of herself. She could have continued to outshine Charles in the press, and enjoyed her kids and the life she had. If she had better psychology she would have outsmarted Camilla and Charles, and would have been the queen herself.

The no seat belt thing is not true. Feel free to google it. And if Charles expected all of that all he had to do was be honest from the beginning and find someone who is fine with that which he almost certainly could have found amongst his social set. The issue is he clearly wanted to marry someone young and virginal and they’re less likely to go for that. It’s not a personality flaw that she was upset that he changed the terms of the agreement. Also Camilla also thought happiness with other men! Except that other man was her ex husband and then her back burner dude was there when her situation didn’t work out. You’re acting like she has a ton of accomplishments on her own and just decided that it was time to find love. She has done absolutely nothing special with her life besides chase after Andrew Parker Bowles and PC.

I looked again. Diana was NOT wearing a seat belt. Yes Charles should have been honest in the beginning, but I'm not sure that was his intended plan. I think he planned to be a dutiful husband until he couldn't, or wouldn't. Still Diana had a opulent lifestyle. The public enjoyed her more than Charles which ticked him off. Again non of these nitwit men were worth giving up all that. I think if she would have stayed and lived her son Harry would have better mental health. A lot of domino effect with the poor choices. Also, I agree about Camilla, but Diana had the ball and dropped it.

She was a blonde, thin, young woman with an Earl for a dad. There’s no reason to think that if she had had the opportunity to date before getting engaged at 19 (!!!) she couldn’t have found someone else to give her an opulent lifestyle as well.

Her two sisters did not marry well and they were equally as attractive

Anonymous wrote:Can William remove her title when he becomes King?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I looked again. Diana was NOT wearing a seat belt. Yes Charles should have been honest in the beginning, but I'm not sure that was his intended plan. I think he planned to be a dutiful husband until he couldn't, or wouldn't. Still Diana had a opulent lifestyle. The public enjoyed her more than Charles which ticked him off. Again non of these nitwit men were worth giving up all that. I think if she would have stayed and lived her son Harry would have better mental health. A lot of domino effect with the poor choices. Also, I agree about Camilla, but Diana had the ball and dropped it.

She was a blonde, thin, young woman with an Earl for a dad. There’s no reason to think that if she had had the opportunity to date before getting engaged at 19 (!!!) she couldn’t have found someone else to give her an opulent lifestyle as well.

Agreed. I like to think without Spencer bullying and Windsor bullying, Diana would have remained single and gorgeous until she was 30 years old and been able to get a handle on her mental health while happily teaching little kids. And then, as a beautiful 30-year old with appropriate medication and a good therapist, she would have attracted the attention of a wealthy gentleman who would have given her all the comforts that Charles could provide, but without all the publicity and abuse.

I really wish her life had gone that route.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Camilla triggers people because the mistress won and the poor wronged spouse ended up dying young. There is a sense of injustice about the whole situation and Camilla does always look like the proverbial cat who got the cream.

I think you're partly right. People forget how unstable she acted. The interviews telling the press about Charles and Camilla and releasing info. for pay back at the monarchy. She became her own worse enemy. She was a very needy person who had countless affairs with other creeps who didn't care she was a married princess. Early on she should have let Charles spend time with Camilla. In fact be happy he was out of her hair, and realized she had nothing in common with him. Whereby Camilla did. Enjoyed the status of her position, and stayed married. Charles would have agreed to that. Her constant need to outdo him, and embarrass the family was the beginning of the end for her. Then she ends up with another creep (cheater) who was suppose to be married in a few days to another woman. And she's in a speeding car with idiots while not wearing a seat belt . Plus she should have had her own security detail, but again another one of her poor judgement calls.

She thought happiness was with other men instead of herself. She could have continued to outshine Charles in the press, and enjoyed her kids and the life she had. If she had better psychology she would have outsmarted Camilla and Charles, and would have been the queen herself.

The no seat belt thing is not true. Feel free to google it. And if Charles expected all of that all he had to do was be honest from the beginning and find someone who is fine with that which he almost certainly could have found amongst his social set. The issue is he clearly wanted to marry someone young and virginal and they’re less likely to go for that. It’s not a personality flaw that she was upset that he changed the terms of the agreement. Also Camilla also thought happiness with other men! Except that other man was her ex husband and then her back burner dude was there when her situation didn’t work out. You’re acting like she has a ton of accomplishments on her own and just decided that it was time to find love. She has done absolutely nothing special with her life besides chase after Andrew Parker Bowles and PC.

I looked again. Diana was NOT wearing a seat belt. Yes Charles should have been honest in the beginning, but I'm not sure that was his intended plan. I think he planned to be a dutiful husband until he couldn't, or wouldn't. Still Diana had a opulent lifestyle. The public enjoyed her more than Charles which ticked him off. Again non of these nitwit men were worth giving up all that. I think if she would have stayed and lived her son Harry would have better mental health. A lot of domino effect with the poor choices. Also, I agree about Camilla, but Diana had the ball and dropped it.

She was a blonde, thin, young woman with an Earl for a dad. There’s no reason to think that if she had had the opportunity to date before getting engaged at 19 (!!!) she couldn’t have found someone else to give her an opulent lifestyle as well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can William remove her title when he becomes King?

Well, Kate will get the title if William becomes King and Camilla is still alive.

Yes, but Queen consort usually remains even after death

Anonymous wrote:If that hoe becomes queen, then I will throw my support behind British republicans and build a shrine to Oliver Cromwell. I'll post pictures of my Cromwell shrine on Instagram everyday and tag Charles and Camilla.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can William remove her title when he becomes King?

Well, Kate will get the title if William becomes King and Camilla is still alive.

Anonymous wrote:Can William remove her title when he becomes King?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If that hoe becomes queen, then I will throw my support behind British republicans and build a shrine to Oliver Cromwell. I'll post pictures of my Cromwell shrine on Instagram everyday and tag Charles and Camilla.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I looked again. Diana was NOT wearing a seat belt. Yes Charles should have been honest in the beginning, but I'm not sure that was his intended plan. I think he planned to be a dutiful husband until he couldn't, or wouldn't. Still Diana had a opulent lifestyle. The public enjoyed her more than Charles which ticked him off. Again non of these nitwit men were worth giving up all that. I think if she would have stayed and lived her son Harry would have better mental health. A lot of domino effect with the poor choices. Also, I agree about Camilla, but Diana had the ball and dropped it.

She was a blonde, thin, young woman with an Earl for a dad. There’s no reason to think that if she had had the opportunity to date before getting engaged at 19 (!!!) she couldn’t have found someone else to give her an opulent lifestyle as well.

Anonymous wrote:If that hoe becomes queen, then I will throw my support behind British republicans and build a shrine to Oliver Cromwell. I'll post pictures of my Cromwell shrine on Instagram everyday and tag Charles and Camilla.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Camilla triggers people because the mistress won and the poor wronged spouse ended up dying young. There is a sense of injustice about the whole situation and Camilla does always look like the proverbial cat who got the cream.

This is actually pretty much how this news made me feel. Like a PP said, I don't care about the royal family and I don't follow news about them. I don't know the names of William's kids or Harry's kids or really anything about their lives. But even as someone who never follows the tabloids, one thing that sticks in my mind is that Camilla is a mistress and Charles is an adulterer.

It's really unfair that after everything Diana went through, she ends up dead and the Rottweiller gets the crown. That just seems...evil and wrong. Like on a gut level.

+100

+1000

Totally agree! And Diana is gone and not here to defend herself when movies + tv portray her mental state in such a harsh light.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m neutral to slightly positive. I strongly disliked her during the Diana days but have realized she and Charles were the victims of time and circumstances beyond their control. I admire her for taking a backseat, not seeking the limelight and paying her dues with her charity work, unlike the Meghan Markles of the world. She’s never complained publicly and has always been supportive of the BRF, even though they treated her like a second-class citizen for years and didn’t consider her good enough to be a marriage prospect for Charles. She held her head high despite being one of the most despised woman in the world. You’ve got to admire her for that, if nothing else.

This.