Anonymous wrote:So is my team screwed out of the 900 dollars we paid for winter league?
Anonymous wrote:I saw this on change.org.
https://www.change.org/p/mayor-david-l-meyer-fairfax-mayor-do-not-close-fairfax-sportsplex?redirect=false
Not much info on why it's closing. Any info?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree the showmanship aspect is celebrated in the latin culture. Which is a factor in why they haven't gained any ground on the European players. The focus of development is totally in the wrong areas of the game.
Are you out of your f’n minds? And can you please stop using Latin when you mean Central/South American, unless you are sweeping Spanish and Portuguese players into these preposterous and incorrect observations?
What continent is Central America officially considered?
Why is the PPs observations preposterous?
What continent has “latins,” dumba$$?
Perhaps more than one?
Is Ronaldo European? Mbappe? Knabery? Perhaps some pretty good foot skills there. Do you think Messi focuses too much on foot skills, or all the Brazilians who are on every roster of every top notch football team in the world?
All players at top levels both (1) have extraordinary foot skills, and (2) know how to play the ball, play with the ball, and play off the ball. One does not come at the expense of other. Those who have footskills get more time to possess the ball and play better passes. Some people are better at one dimension of the game than others but that doesn’t mean we should be focusing exclusively on one or the other. It’s a silly discussion and plainly wrong with respect to both soccer and continental and cultural stereotypes.
Remember stereotypes only stick if there is truth to it.
Looks like you are representative of people who are dumb and like cliches. Congratulations on living up to stereotype.
It is what it is but bet you cant prove a stereotype to be false .
Anonymous wrote:It was the same price to have a team at sportsplex and St James. Clear winner in this debate. Sportsplex is an expensive dump
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree the showmanship aspect is celebrated in the latin culture. Which is a factor in why they haven't gained any ground on the European players. The focus of development is totally in the wrong areas of the game.
Are you out of your f’n minds? And can you please stop using Latin when you mean Central/South American, unless you are sweeping Spanish and Portuguese players into these preposterous and incorrect observations?
What continent is Central America officially considered?
Why is the PPs observations preposterous?
What continent has “latins,” dumba$$?
Perhaps more than one?
Is Ronaldo European? Mbappe? Knabery? Perhaps some pretty good foot skills there. Do you think Messi focuses too much on foot skills, or all the Brazilians who are on every roster of every top notch football team in the world?
All players at top levels both (1) have extraordinary foot skills, and (2) know how to play the ball, play with the ball, and play off the ball. One does not come at the expense of other. Those who have footskills get more time to possess the ball and play better passes. Some people are better at one dimension of the game than others but that doesn’t mean we should be focusing exclusively on one or the other. It’s a silly discussion and plainly wrong with respect to both soccer and continental and cultural stereotypes.
Remember stereotypes only stick if there is truth to it.
Looks like you are representative of people who are dumb and like cliches. Congratulations on living up to stereotype.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree the showmanship aspect is celebrated in the latin culture. Which is a factor in why they haven't gained any ground on the European players. The focus of development is totally in the wrong areas of the game.
Are you out of your f’n minds? And can you please stop using Latin when you mean Central/South American, unless you are sweeping Spanish and Portuguese players into these preposterous and incorrect observations?
What continent is Central America officially considered?
Why is the PPs observations preposterous?
What continent has “latins,” dumba$$?
Perhaps more than one?
Is Ronaldo European? Mbappe? Knabery? Perhaps some pretty good foot skills there. Do you think Messi focuses too much on foot skills, or all the Brazilians who are on every roster of every top notch football team in the world?
All players at top levels both (1) have extraordinary foot skills, and (2) know how to play the ball, play with the ball, and play off the ball. One does not come at the expense of other. Those who have footskills get more time to possess the ball and play better passes. Some people are better at one dimension of the game than others but that doesn’t mean we should be focusing exclusively on one or the other. It’s a silly discussion and plainly wrong with respect to both soccer and continental and cultural stereotypes.
Remember stereotypes only stick if there is truth to it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree the showmanship aspect is celebrated in the latin culture. Which is a factor in why they haven't gained any ground on the European players. The focus of development is totally in the wrong areas of the game.
Are you out of your f’n minds? And can you please stop using Latin when you mean Central/South American, unless you are sweeping Spanish and Portuguese players into these preposterous and incorrect observations?
What continent is Central America officially considered?
Why is the PPs observations preposterous?
What continent has “latins,” dumba$$?
Perhaps more than one?
Is Ronaldo European? Mbappe? Knabery? Perhaps some pretty good foot skills there. Do you think Messi focuses too much on foot skills, or all the Brazilians who are on every roster of every top notch football team in the world?
All players at top levels both (1) have extraordinary foot skills, and (2) know how to play the ball, play with the ball, and play off the ball. One does not come at the expense of other. Those who have footskills get more time to possess the ball and play better passes. Some people are better at one dimension of the game than others but that doesn’t mean we should be focusing exclusively on one or the other. It’s a silly discussion and plainly wrong with respect to both soccer and continental and cultural stereotypes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree the showmanship aspect is celebrated in the latin culture. Which is a factor in why they haven't gained any ground on the European players. The focus of development is totally in the wrong areas of the game.
Are you out of your f’n minds? And can you please stop using Latin when you mean Central/South American, unless you are sweeping Spanish and Portuguese players into these preposterous and incorrect observations?
What continent is Central America officially considered?
Why is the PPs observations preposterous?