Anonymous wrote:Ok, just posted it. thanks.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree -- by virtue of the fact it is front and center...it has been endorsed..."actions speak louder than words"-- i.e. the action of having it listed first makes it an endorsement by Jeff. If it's so great ...it will find its way back to the top.
If there is any controversy over whether or not I have "endorsed" this FAQ, let me clear that up right now. I wholeheartedly endorse this FAQ as a useful resource for those interested in independent and private schools in the Washington, DC metropolitan area. There, I'm sure that will send it directly to the top of the best-sellers list.
Again, anyone who believes there are errors in the FAQ is welcome to submit corrections. You are even welcome to create an entirely new FAQ. If someone wants to create a FAQ that does nothing but address the question of "Who is the big 3?", I will make it a sticky (and also sell popcorn for the ensuring dust up).
Ok, I'll bite (I'm the PP who proposed an alternative definition for Big 3 that does not endorse any particular schools.) I'll post a "FAQ: Who is the Big 3?" thread now. Thanks for agreeing to make it sticky.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree -- by virtue of the fact it is front and center...it has been endorsed..."actions speak louder than words"-- i.e. the action of having it listed first makes it an endorsement by Jeff. If it's so great ...it will find its way back to the top.
If there is any controversy over whether or not I have "endorsed" this FAQ, let me clear that up right now. I wholeheartedly endorse this FAQ as a useful resource for those interested in independent and private schools in the Washington, DC metropolitan area. There, I'm sure that will send it directly to the top of the best-sellers list.
Again, anyone who believes there are errors in the FAQ is welcome to submit corrections. You are even welcome to create an entirely new FAQ. If someone wants to create a FAQ that does nothing but address the question of "Who is the big 3?", I will make it a sticky (and also sell popcorn for the ensuring dust up).
Anonymous wrote:I agree -- by virtue of the fact it is front and center...it has been endorsed..."actions speak louder than words"-- i.e. the action of having it listed first makes it an endorsement by Jeff. If it's so great ...it will find its way back to the top.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Now that Jeff has endorsed this Stay at Home Anonymous poster -- people may rely to their detriment on her postings. That's not good.
Whether Jeff has endorsed this thread or not, it would appear it has some official status as it is on top of the forum. This space is usually reserved for moderator sanctioned threads. While the OP may want to be of service, it is concerning that part of her "data on test scores and other academic awards is compiled" http://fwd4.me/Jes which includes stats grid is speculative, incomplete, inaccurate. Yes there are some accuracies, but she is relying own questionable data which is incomplete and she fails to cite references with footnotes (Wikipedia style) or even assign years for this data. The fact of the matter is that the grid is incorrect. I would not mind her post if it were not tacked on at the top of the private school forums - which makes it look official. No one elected this person moderator or deemed her to be fair and her data is skewed. It is misleading that she has taken it upon herself to post her thread at the top of the forum.
I feel strongly the post needs to be removed from it's current status at the top of the forum.
Please consider this Jeff.
Thank you!!
Anonymous wrote:Dear SAM2,
You have done a great job in terms of your original FAQ post, your willingness to add and amend as necessary, and your incredibly polite responses to many of the responsive posts that were less than balanced in tone (and that is an understatement). I am really sorry that you had to come in for such abuse, but please know your efforts are appreciated by many. If it's any consolation, the responsive posts certainly validated your conclusions as to which subjects are controversial! (Now anybody starting a thread on "what schools are in the Big 3" MUST be looking for an argument!) Again, kudos and thanks.