Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We're not car people and we drive a Toyota.
+1 all the “not car people” I know drive Hondas or Toyotas. Almost regardless of wealth/income.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well they mean they don't drive super interesting cars, which is true. And?
It generally means they buy lower-key but still new and pricey cars. They avoid tacky flashy cars but still wouldn't be caught dead in anything cheap or used.
Anonymous wrote:I guess I'm really not a car person because I don't know what kind of cars these are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We're not car people and we drive a Toyota.
+1 all the “not car people” I know drive Hondas or Toyotas. Almost regardless of wealth/income.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh I thought not a car person meant you knew nothing about cars and didn’t care (I’ll spend money on a car, but I’m going for safety and size over flashy speed and the thing that makes the loud noise).
Do you mean not car people don’t have cars?
DP. This is how I use the term. When I say I'm not a car person I mean I am not interested in cars and don't want to spend any time thinking about them. I just want them to do what I need them to do. I don't mean I consciously arrange my life to avoid cars.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I live in Takoma Park/Silver Spring and my midwestern parents often comment on how people in my neighborhood live in $1M+ houses but they mostly see minivans and Priuses in driveways. Where they live - they see fancier cars in the driveways of lower middle class neighborhoods than they do here. They seem to mention it every.single.visit.
Same. My million dollar neighborhood here has mostly Hondas, Toyotas and Jeeps. My parent's 400k neighborhood (which is pricey where they live) has Lamborghinis, Range Rovers, Mercedes, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well they mean they don't drive super interesting cars, which is true. And?
It generally means they buy lower-key but still new and pricey cars. They avoid tacky flashy cars but still wouldn't be caught dead in anything cheap or used.
We have lots of money and bought a used car. I'm not a car person and neither is my DH while we have young kids. We got a 2yo Mercedes GLC for a great deal and it works for our family. Why would we deliberately pay more than necessary?
[Headdesk]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when is a volvo a status car? Volvo, Honda, Toyota, Ford, Jeep, VW are just....cars.
Do you consider BMWs status cars? Because Volvos cost as much as BMWs these days.
Cost doesn't equal status. A Volvo is a frumpy utilitarian car no matter how much it costs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP you literally posted two cars that for me are the definition of "not being a car person." Those cars are garbage
DP, but I think that's the point. They're boring SUVs with terrible driving dynamics that the nouveau riche think are inconspicuous, but are very strong signals of their socioeconomic status. Just because they're not Bentleys or bright yellow Lamborghinis doesn't mean that they can claim that they're above conspicuous consumption.
Correct. "Car people" in this context isn't like muscle car or sports cars, it means they're trying to act above dedicating any and all mind share to the automobile, whether sports cars or gaudy luxury cars. But end of the day they STILL have nice new cars in their driveway, just cars they think are inconspicuous and tasteful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when is a volvo a status car? Volvo, Honda, Toyota, Ford, Jeep, VW are just....cars.
Do you consider BMWs status cars? Because Volvos cost as much as BMWs these days.
Anonymous wrote:Oh I thought not a car person meant you knew nothing about cars and didn’t care (I’ll spend money on a car, but I’m going for safety and size over flashy speed and the thing that makes the loud noise).
Do you mean not car people don’t have cars?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well they mean they don't drive super interesting cars, which is true. And?
It generally means they buy lower-key but still new and pricey cars. They avoid tacky flashy cars but still wouldn't be caught dead in anything cheap or used.
We have lots of money and bought a used car. I'm not a car person and neither is my DH while we have young kids. We got a 2yo Mercedes GLC for a great deal and it works for our family. Why would we deliberately pay more than necessary?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well they mean they don't drive super interesting cars, which is true. And?
It generally means they buy lower-key but still new and pricey cars. They avoid tacky flashy cars but still wouldn't be caught dead in anything cheap or used.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I live in Takoma Park/Silver Spring and my midwestern parents often comment on how people in my neighborhood live in $1M+ houses but they mostly see minivans and Priuses in driveways. Where they live - they see fancier cars in the driveways of lower middle class neighborhoods than they do here. They seem to mention it every.single.visit.
Same. My million dollar neighborhood here has mostly Hondas, Toyotas and Jeeps. My parent's 400k neighborhood (which is pricey where they live) has Lamborghinis, Range Rovers, Mercedes, etc.
To be fair, a million dollar neighborhood in DC isn't exactly novel or particularly wealthy.
Sure, but they could afford a car nicer than a 25k Toyota.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP you literally posted two cars that for me are the definition of "not being a car person." Those cars are garbage
DP, but I think that's the point. They're boring SUVs with terrible driving dynamics that the nouveau riche think are inconspicuous, but are very strong signals of their socioeconomic status. Just because they're not Bentleys or bright yellow Lamborghinis doesn't mean that they can claim that they're above conspicuous consumption.