Anonymous wrote:If not, is it because of their stance on LBGTQ issues? My child has voiced concerns and I’m trying to fully understand the whole thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not so cut and dry for me. Cfa treats their employees better than almost any other fast food company. They pay better, provide college scholarships, promote from within almost exclusively. They have literally done more for many economically disadvantaged and/or minority people I know than many actual non profits. If you are boycotting them for, say, McDonald’s or Popeyes which exploits mostly minority employees relentlessly and uses fake marketing as if they have minority owners with no real opportunities for employees, I don’t really see the logic in that. I hate their lgbt stance but there are no perfect actors in that industry. We need stronger food service unions.
The phrase you’re looking for is cut and dried.
Anonymous wrote:I eat at ChikFilA but hell will freeze over before you'll ever catch me in a Hobby Lobby.
Anonymous wrote:This is not so cut and dry for me. Cfa treats their employees better than almost any other fast food company. They pay better, provide college scholarships, promote from within almost exclusively. They have literally done more for many economically disadvantaged and/or minority people I know than many actual non profits. If you are boycotting them for, say, McDonald’s or Popeyes which exploits mostly minority employees relentlessly and uses fake marketing as if they have minority owners with no real opportunities for employees, I don’t really see the logic in that. I hate their lgbt stance but there are no perfect actors in that industry. We need stronger food service unions.
Anonymous wrote:No and Yes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No and yes. And I don't shop at Hobby Lobby for the same reason.
Same on both for me. And, we don't shop at Home Depot either. There is nothing that tastes so good that I would support a business that actively supports those who are trying to destroy my family.
Anonymous wrote:I do very occasionally, even though I don't like their stance on gay marriage or other LGBTQ+ issues. In general we try not to patronize businesses with these kinds of political stances (Chick-Fil-A, Urban Outfitters, etc.). But we also don't like to patronize businesses that have poor employment practices, and if we are on a road trip and I need to pick between the two, I'll choose the business with the bad politics over the one that actively takes advantage of their employees.
Ultimately, I think the people who own Chick-fil-a are relatively powerless over the shifting attitudes in this country wrt LGBTQ+ issues, as well as other "family values" issues. I think coordinated boycotts are really tough because consumers often have limited choices, and I'm not going to judge anyone who eats at Chick-fil-a or orders from Amazon because I don't know what went into those decisions.
BUT, if given a choice, I will make a different one. I'm just not militant about it and think there are better ways to combat conservative politics than yelling at people for eating a chicken sandwich.
Anonymous wrote:Show her the truth behind the claims
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/06/30/fact-check-chick-fil-a-has-not-resumed-donations-groups-oppose-lgbtq-rights/3244765001/
“ in November 2019, Chick-fil-A's donations got attention again when the company announced its areas of charity focus for 2020 — education, homelessness and hunger — and expanded partnerships with Junior Achievement, Covenant House and local food banks.
The shift in focus meant the company's charity initiative would no longer involve donations to groups that had previously fueled criticism, including the Salvation Army and Fellowship of Christian Athletes.”
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/uganda-murder-gay-chick-fil-a/