Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You people are crazy. She looks like she aged normally, WITHOUT fillers. That’s why she looks bad. She hasn’t done anything/much.
Disagree, her cheeks are fuller now than before and have that odd rubbery chicken cutlet look.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She has no lips and her eyes are barely there.
It's very specific lighting and makeup choices. I wonder if it was in service to the story being told.
In the film, she’s supposed to be a desirable woman.
But what was going on in that scene, in particular? (I don't know, myself.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She had fillers, then dissolved them.
The problem is that you never look normal, like your normally aging self even if you have them dissolved. It looks horrible.
Botox is one thing, but you couldn't pay me to do fillers - they always look horrible and disfiguring. People's faces are meant to look a certain way, and when you start effing with it, things always look strange (at best).
Kind of hijacking the thread, but what does this mean - dissolved them? I thought fillers were like Botox and wore off?
That’s my question as well - where has she had fillers and how can you tell?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She had fillers, then dissolved them.
The problem is that you never look normal, like your normally aging self even if you have them dissolved. It looks horrible.
Botox is one thing, but you couldn't pay me to do fillers - they always look horrible and disfiguring. People's faces are meant to look a certain way, and when you start effing with it, things always look strange (at best).
Kind of hijacking the thread, but what does this mean - dissolved them? I thought fillers were like Botox and wore off?
Anonymous wrote:She had fillers, then dissolved them.
The problem is that you never look normal, like your normally aging self even if you have them dissolved. It looks horrible.
Botox is one thing, but you couldn't pay me to do fillers - they always look horrible and disfiguring. People's faces are meant to look a certain way, and when you start effing with it, things always look strange (at best).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Her skin is awfully smooth. I would say she hasn't had surgery but she has had botox at least.
I agree. Botox or some other kind of injectible?
I really don't think so. Look at the linked photo above- deep expression lines across the forehead wouldn't happen with Botox.
Anonymous wrote:You people are crazy. She looks like she aged normally, WITHOUT fillers. That’s why she looks bad. She hasn’t done anything/much.
Anonymous wrote:Leave poor Helen Hunt alone! This is what menopause will do to you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You people are crazy. She looks like she aged normally, WITHOUT fillers. That’s why she looks bad. She hasn’t done anything/much.
That's what I think too. If you were doing fillers why would you be like, "oh. Leave the smokers lines. And I'm cool with no lips. I like deep forehead lines and crows feet, so no messing with that!" She's also jowly which shows less volume, not more.
I know REAL LIFE PEOPLE walking around DC with kids who don't color their hair and all that and aren't doing things to their face who are 58 and don't look this aged.
Anonymous wrote:She has done something to her mouth! In recent pics of her, it’s looks like her top lip is caving.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You people are crazy. She looks like she aged normally, WITHOUT fillers. That’s why she looks bad. She hasn’t done anything/much.
That's what I think too. If you were doing fillers why would you be like, "oh. Leave the smokers lines. And I'm cool with no lips. I like deep forehead lines and crows feet, so no messing with that!" She's also jowly which shows less volume, not more.