
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Troll? Let's unpack this. They were a "top performer " last year at age 6? In the 8&U? Extremely unlikely.
Anyway, size greatly determines speed at that age. So other kids probably grew more.
Different poster but last year our 6-year old was top 3 at intra squad meets in 8&U in a couple of strokes and we go to a pool with a huge swim team, so not at all unbelievable.
But to answer OP, it really doesn’t matter so long as they had fun. You don’t mention it again. Maybe they will go faster at the next B meet, maybe they won’t.
Lol, can’t miss an opportunity to brag anonymously!![]()
You enjoy those B meets.
😜
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Troll? Let's unpack this. They were a "top performer " last year at age 6? In the 8&U? Extremely unlikely.
Anyway, size greatly determines speed at that age. So other kids probably grew more.
Different poster but last year our 6-year old was top 3 at intra squad meets in 8&U in a couple of strokes and we go to a pool with a huge swim team, so not at all unbelievable.
But to answer OP, it really doesn’t matter so long as they had fun. You don’t mention it again. Maybe they will go faster at the next B meet, maybe they won’t.
Lol, can’t miss an opportunity to brag anonymously!![]()
You enjoy those B meets.
😜
Anonymous wrote:Bottom 3 is not horrible. Horrible is dead last a lap behind the next person.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Troll? Let's unpack this. They were a "top performer " last year at age 6? In the 8&U? Extremely unlikely.
Anyway, size greatly determines speed at that age. So other kids probably grew more.
Different poster but last year our 6-year old was top 3 at intra squad meets in 8&U in a couple of strokes and we go to a pool with a huge swim team, so not at all unbelievable.
But to answer OP, it really doesn’t matter so long as they had fun. You don’t mention it again. Maybe they will go faster at the next B meet, maybe they won’t.
Lol, can’t miss an opportunity to brag anonymously!![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Troll? Let's unpack this. They were a "top performer " last year at age 6? In the 8&U? Extremely unlikely.
Anyway, size greatly determines speed at that age. So other kids probably grew more.
Different poster but last year our 6-year old was top 3 at intra squad meets in 8&U in a couple of strokes and we go to a pool with a huge swim team, so not at all unbelievable.
But to answer OP, it really doesn’t matter so long as they had fun. You don’t mention it again. Maybe they will go faster at the next B meet, maybe they won’t.
Anonymous wrote:Troll? Let's unpack this. They were a "top performer " last year at age 6? In the 8&U? Extremely unlikely.
Anyway, size greatly determines speed at that age. So other kids probably grew more.
Anonymous wrote:There weren’t swim meets anywhere around here last summer.
Our team had virtual meets with other teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bottom 3 is not horrible. Horrible is dead last a lap behind the next person.
Nope, that was my 9 year old niece. She did her best. We were proud. Horrible is the lifeguard jumps in to save you, or you have a terrible meltdown on the deck. No child in a race does “horrible”
Well whether or not that happened to your niece that’s what qualifies as horrible in my book. I was on swim team as a kid/teen and had my share of horrible meets. Merely losing isn’t it but losing by a lap is.