Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CRT is a lie which does not belong in any classroom.
But you’re fine with the other lies?
DP. It's neither a lie nor truth. It is a perspective, a lens through which to view history. Public education should teach about various perspectives without requiring strict adherence to any particular viewpoint.
The way CRT is being taught in some schools is not that different from teaching creationism as absolute fact.
I tend to believe that CRT can be viewed that way - as an academic approach to studying history - but in practice it typically seems to be accompanied by s very specific political agenda to address disparities among racial groups through the redistribution of wealth and race-based allocations of societal resources. The latter sounds most defensible when couched in legal or academic terms, but in practice is a recipe for a second civil war.
Anonymous wrote:I really feel like this country is on the precipice of slipping back into Jim Crow. My parents are Boomers and they told me a number of their long-time friends and colleagues have absolutely become radicalized by what they are reading on Facebook and seeing on Fox News. To the point where these people are OK expressing that they think certain populations - based on race - shouldn't be allowed to vote. And, of course, they get offended when my parents say "Hey, that's racist."
The seed has been planted and it's germinating.
This country is about to go through some things and it won't be pleasant.
-White Guy
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CRT is a lie which does not belong in any classroom.
But you’re fine with the other lies?
DP. It's neither a lie nor truth. It is a perspective, a lens through which to view history. Public education should teach about various perspectives without requiring strict adherence to any particular viewpoint.
The way CRT is being taught in some schools is not that different from teaching creationism as absolute fact.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CRT is a lie which does not belong in any classroom.
I wonder if you have the same thoughts on Creationism in the classroom. I'm guessing not.
Christians will allow a lot of things in the classroom, but an accurate portrayal of racial subjugation? Not a chance.
Anonymous wrote:did you read the legislation? It didn't say anything about banning discussions on race. it just establishes guidelines to discourage calling white kids oppressors and privileged. I agree 100%. it's gone too far. my super quiet DD has to deal with black kids calling her and other kids racist for no reason except that she is white.
teach history and leave the blame out of it. it is causing as many problems as religion in schools was said to cause.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t want public school teachers teaching race or white privilege to my non-white kids, are you kidding me? I barely trust them to teach essay writing.
One of my public school teachers, who insisted their class of 10th graders watch Roots from start-to-finish, absolutely changed my life and perspective on society.
Its about exposure not necessarily having the Cicero of educators teaching you at every level.
I don’t see anything in this proposal that would prevent showing the kids Roots.
One thing I’m very skeptical of is white teachers trying to explain how bad off nonwhites are, in a way that’s ultimately disempowering and discouraging. Honestly, again, as a the parent of nonwhite kids, I don’t want white people teaching my kids any of this, full stop.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:did you read the legislation? It didn't say anything about banning discussions on race. it just establishes guidelines to discourage calling white kids oppressors and privileged. I agree 100%. it's gone too far. my super quiet DD has to deal with black kids calling her and other kids racist for no reason except that she is white.
teach history and leave the blame out of it. it is causing as many problems as religion in schools was said to cause.
OMG wow Ms. Racist glad you came out to play.
You are 100% incorrect.
And Shame on you. Get your kid out of public school clearly you need a very small nonacademic religious private full of white Racists.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:did you read the legislation? It didn't say anything about banning discussions on race. it just establishes guidelines to discourage calling white kids oppressors and privileged. I agree 100%. it's gone too far. my super quiet DD has to deal with black kids calling her and other kids racist for no reason except that she is white.
teach history and leave the blame out of it. it is causing as many problems as religion in schools was said to cause.
OMG wow Ms. Racist glad you came out to play.
You are 100% incorrect.
And Shame on you. Get your kid out of public school clearly you need a very small nonacademic religious private full of white Racists.
“My kid was harassed for being white”
Crazy lady on the internet: “Shame on you, racist!” 😂😂
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:did you read the legislation? It didn't say anything about banning discussions on race. it just establishes guidelines to discourage calling white kids oppressors and privileged. I agree 100%. it's gone too far. my super quiet DD has to deal with black kids calling her and other kids racist for no reason except that she is white.
teach history and leave the blame out of it. it is causing as many problems as religion in schools was said to cause.
OMG wow Ms. Racist glad you came out to play.
You are 100% incorrect.
And Shame on you. Get your kid out of public school clearly you need a very small nonacademic religious private full of white Racists.
Anonymous wrote:The policy would ban the discussion of any current events in the classroom.
Wtf? This is some North Korean crap.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CRT is a lie which does not belong in any classroom.
But you’re fine with the other lies?
DP. It's neither a lie nor truth. It is a perspective, a lens through which to view history. Public education should teach about various perspectives without requiring strict adherence to any particular viewpoint.
The way CRT is being taught in some schools is not that different from teaching creationism as absolute fact.
I completely agree with you. I also hope that history and government classes have evolved from when I took them. While it’s not exactly a “lie” to center history solely around white, male perspectives, the traditional focus on only one perspective and the exclusion of others was considered the official “truth” way back when.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CRT is a lie which does not belong in any classroom.
But you’re fine with the other lies?
DP. It's neither a lie nor truth. It is a perspective, a lens through which to view history. Public education should teach about various perspectives without requiring strict adherence to any particular viewpoint.
The way CRT is being taught in some schools is not that different from teaching creationism as absolute fact.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t want public school teachers teaching race or white privilege to my non-white kids, are you kidding me? I barely trust them to teach essay writing.
One of my public school teachers, who insisted their class of 10th graders watch Roots from start-to-finish, absolutely changed my life and perspective on society.
Its about exposure not necessarily having the Cicero of educators teaching you at every level.
I don’t see anything in this proposal that would prevent showing the kids Roots.
One thing I’m very skeptical of is white teachers trying to explain how bad off nonwhites are, in a way that’s ultimately disempowering and discouraging. Honestly, again, as a the parent of nonwhite kids, I don’t want white people teaching my kids any of this, full stop.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CRT is a lie which does not belong in any classroom.
But you’re fine with the other lies?