Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Always entertaining to watch you pathetic loons argue over useless topics, your husbands are either saints or alcoholics to put up with your insane attitudes.
Plot twist: these are actually husbands arguing about trivial stuff to avoid doing work.
Anonymous wrote:I think they have sacrificed so much to "get where they are," that it is incredibly threatening to find out maybe it was not necessary...or even the path that was best for their family.
No, they have to insult reasonable posts like this, rather than accept that their costly approach may not have been necessary (or rewarding in the ways that really count).
Anonymous wrote:Always entertaining to watch you pathetic loons argue over useless topics, your husbands are either saints or alcoholics to put up with your insane attitudes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it makes a difference if you go to a tippy top school. Other than that, the next T50 don’t matter as much. The difference between a school like Tufts or Vanderbilt, say, is negligible even though Vandy is higher ranked. They are both great schools.
I there is another difference once you start past the T100 school. You may have more opportunities graduating from Emory than Appalachian, for instance.
But if you are talking T15-T50, it makes no difference.
You didn't understand my post at all. How old are your kids?
What are you talking about? The pp is spot on.
Sigh. I give up. Clearly you're still in the midst of all of this. Y'all can just go ahead and split hairs between schools and tiers like you always do. As I said, I should have known I was preaching to the wrong crowd.
I'm out.
I use this example of the relationship between school prestige and salary all the time in my undergraduate stats class. We talk about things like the "Bill Gates problem." (I.E. The average salary of a Harvard grad is quite high, but it's often due to a couple of outliers whose salaries have an inordinate effect on the mean. How might we control for this effect? Would it more be more useful to look at the median salary? Is the distribution skewed and how do we fix it? What salaries do those in the middle quartiles typically get, etc. )
We also talk about controlling for those other factors. For example, more people who go to Harvard are likely to go to work in a family business where they are paid an artificially inflated salary (see Jared Kushner).
Just look at the salary outcomes from the school and it obvious that IN GENERAL, higher ranked schools produce better outcomes.
Now control for parent salary. Oops, did we discover something we didn't mean to? Pull that curtain back into place!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Always entertaining to watch you pathetic loons argue over useless topics, your husbands are either saints or alcoholics to put up with your insane attitudes.
Well, aren't you a helpful addition!
Anonymous wrote:Always entertaining to watch you pathetic loons argue over useless topics, your husbands are either saints or alcoholics to put up with your insane attitudes.
Anonymous wrote:The two options are not wealth or poverty.
The vast majority of adults fall in between. You are deceiving yourself about what is necessary for a good life.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/26/how-your-salary-and-the-way-you-spend-money-affect-your-happiness.html
Anonymous wrote:I think they have sacrificed so much to "get where they are," that it is incredibly threatening to find out maybe it was not necessary...or even the path that was best for their family.
No, they have to insult reasonable posts like this, rather than accept that their costly approach may not have been necessary (or rewarding in the ways that really count).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they have sacrificed so much to "get where they are," that it is incredibly threatening to find out maybe it was not necessary...or even the path that was best for their family.
No, they have to insult reasonable posts like this, rather than accept that their costly approach may not have been necessary (or rewarding in the ways that really count).
Exactly! It's so threatening to them precisely because of this. They KNOW it's true, but can't really acknowledge it because they have so much invested in it. This college board is really among the worst of DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:I think they have sacrificed so much to "get where they are," that it is incredibly threatening to find out maybe it was not necessary...or even the path that was best for their family.
No, they have to insult reasonable posts like this, rather than accept that their costly approach may not have been necessary (or rewarding in the ways that really count).
Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how many horrible people your post brought out of the woodwork, OP. It hits a nerve because they have so much riding on this stuff.
I'm with you, and these people who are obsessed with rankings and prestige must be insufferable in real life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it makes a difference if you go to a tippy top school. Other than that, the next T50 don’t matter as much. The difference between a school like Tufts or Vanderbilt, say, is negligible even though Vandy is higher ranked. They are both great schools.
I there is another difference once you start past the T100 school. You may have more opportunities graduating from Emory than Appalachian, for instance.
But if you are talking T15-T50, it makes no difference.
You didn't understand my post at all. How old are your kids?
What are you talking about? The pp is spot on.
Sigh. I give up. Clearly you're still in the midst of all of this. Y'all can just go ahead and split hairs between schools and tiers like you always do. As I said, I should have known I was preaching to the wrong crowd.
I'm out.
Just look at the salary outcomes from the school and it obvious that IN GENERAL, higher ranked schools produce better outcomes.
Not really if you look at mid career salaries the highest ones outside Ivies are generally STEM schools not the highest ranked ones either
Such a weasly argument. Again IN GENERAL across all majors. Obviously you have a STEM degree because you lack basic critical thinking and reading comprehension skills.
People usually resort to name-calling when they can't debate any more on the facts.
No one is arguing that a kid from MIT will do better financially and have more opportunities generally speaking than a kid that is a VT if they both have the same major. My argument is that MAJOR, GPA and marketable knowledge is generally so much more important than where you go. Ask me how I know.
+1 and I will add work ethic
in fact, drive and work ethic is the biggest predictor of success and one can not be taught or trained to have it
And what do unhooked kids at top schools disproportionately have over kids from other schools?