Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Go to BRYC instead--much cheaper
So I can spend 40 minutes in traffic each way for every practice and home game rather than 20 or less? No thanks. I like having those extra hours every week for other things.
Yep, I am sure you are curing cancer with all that extra time. Lol. The self-importance of people and their little pockets of time never cease to amaze.
Anonymous wrote:Go to BRYC instead--much cheaper
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Go to BRYC instead--much cheaper
So I can spend 40 minutes in traffic each way for every practice and home game rather than 20 or less? No thanks. I like having those extra hours every week for other things.
Yep, I am sure you are curing cancer with all that extra time. Lol. The self-importance of people and their little pockets of time never cease to amaze.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Go to BRYC instead--much cheaper
So I can spend 40 minutes in traffic each way for every practice and home game rather than 20 or less? No thanks. I like having those extra hours every week for other things.
Yep, I am sure you are curing cancer with all that extra time. Lol. The self-importance of people and their little pockets of time never cease to amaze.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Go to BRYC instead--much cheaper
So I can spend 40 minutes in traffic each way for every practice and home game rather than 20 or less? No thanks. I like having those extra hours every week for other things.
Anonymous wrote:Go to BRYC instead--much cheaper
Anonymous wrote:Pp again. To clarify, i have zero issue with any of those teams existing, and take no issue with parents paying for their kids to play on them.
Why? Money is not an issue for me, and my kid wants to play. I'd prefer for him to be out getting exercise with friends vs. sitting at home on video games. His other sport is only twice a week, so happy to have him out playing soccer on the sixth team other days. If he wants to do something different in the future, that's fine too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Adding Omar Ismail to the boys side is fantastic - he's one of the best coaches in the region. This team is improved from what was already a really strong group.
Agreed. Have seen him in other contexts and he is a perfect add for those top age groups on the boys side. He will be first rate. I posted in the fall that one of the big clubs needed to grab him.
What other contexts? Thanks.
Not PP, but DS (who happens to play for Arlington) knows Omar from Futstars. DS likes him a lot.
Oscar hires him for his private side hustle w futstars.
Oscar being ECNL / academy director must’ve played a role in putting Omar first team over folks that have been around a while.
I'm sure Oscar gets a huge say, perhaps even the only say, in who coaches the academy teams. But irrespective of who brought him on board it's a great move for Arlington and really good news for the 2008 and 2009 teams that he will be coaching.
Pp again. To clarify, i have zero issue with any of those teams existing, and take no issue with parents paying for their kids to play on them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Adding Omar Ismail to the boys side is fantastic - he's one of the best coaches in the region. This team is improved from what was already a really strong group.
Agreed. Have seen him in other contexts and he is a perfect add for those top age groups on the boys side. He will be first rate. I posted in the fall that one of the big clubs needed to grab him.
What other contexts? Thanks.
Not PP, but DS (who happens to play for Arlington) knows Omar from Futstars. DS likes him a lot.
Oscar hires him for his private side hustle w futstars.
Oscar being ECNL / academy director must’ve played a role in putting Omar first team over folks that have been around a while.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pp again. To clarify, i have zero issue with any of those teams existing, and take no issue with parents paying for their kids to play on them.
Not on 6th team but have a kid that is not on top team and is developmentally appropriate and child loves it. Doesn't want to play in college. Would be bored to tears in Rec. There is a place.
Pp here, I completely agree. My kid is on a lower team (although not sixth team), it is the right place for his skill level and interest, and he loves it. Fortunately we can afford it, so we are happy to do it.
Anonymous wrote:Pp again. To clarify, i have zero issue with any of those teams existing, and take no issue with parents paying for their kids to play on them.
Not on 6th team but have a kid that is not on top team and is developmentally appropriate and child loves it. Doesn't want to play in college. Would be bored to tears in Rec. There is a place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ooch, $2,670
http://arlingtonsoccer.com/programs/development-academy/fees
Those are last years fees...not sure what 21-22 fees are-have 72 hours!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ooch, $2,670
http://arlingtonsoccer.com/programs/development-academy/fees