Anonymous wrote:I'm 5'7", bf is 5'6." He probably has about 60 lbs on me. Absolutely NO complaints in bed.

Sounds like his height is the least of his problems. He's lucky to have found you.

I'm 5'7", bf is 5'6." He probably has about 60 lbs on me. Absolutely NO complaints in bed.

No. I'm 5'6 and I would possibly date my height if they were good looking and had a great personality. I have had sex with guys my height and no issues.

But my preference is that they are at least taller than me in heels. Most of my ex-bfs and DH are all in the 5'9'-5'11 range. I think I've only dated one or two guys that were over 6'.

Anonymous wrote:I only date short scrawny men or short piggies I can ride. The question is one of girth. Will I even feel anything? I had a tall buff boyfriend and I was like “is it in yet?” Short men are the unsung hung bedroom hero’s.

Lol no.

I only date short scrawny men or short piggies I can ride. The question is one of girth. Will I even feel anything? I had a tall buff boyfriend and I was like “is it in yet?” Short men are the unsung hung bedroom hero’s.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the 5'10 woman who says it has to do with submission, I am also 5'10 and have been "dominated" by plenty of shorter men.

... but how? Are they physically commanding in some other way, like muscular? Or is this some mind play thing? For me it wasn't possible to feel overtaken by someone I'm physically larger and stronger than.

DP.. if you are tied up, even a scrawny man can dominate you.

Anonymous wrote:For the 5'10 woman who says it has to do with submission, I am also 5'10 and have been "dominated" by plenty of shorter men.

... but how? Are they physically commanding in some other way, like muscular? Or is this some mind play thing? For me it wasn't possible to feel overtaken by someone I'm physically larger and stronger than.

Anonymous wrote:I'm 5'10 so I've dated so many men my height or shorter. It is something I have actively struggled with. It is so much internalized misogyny to take issue with it and I've worked hard not to care. If you are a tall woman who won't consider dating shorter men, you are eliminating a lot of great possibilities.

Huh. I’m 6’ and have only dated men taller than I am. Maybe a handful who were right around 6’ as well? I think the average would be at least 6’3” though. Married a 6’5” hottie and am still shorter than him in heels.

For the 5'10 woman who says it has to do with submission, I am also 5'10 and have been "dominated" by plenty of shorter men.

Anonymous wrote:Hell, no. But then I'm 5'2" ...

You posted this on the first page, so either remember your trolling or step up your game.

I'm 5'10 so I've dated so many men my height or shorter. It is something I have actively struggled with. It is so much internalized misogyny to take issue with it and I've worked hard not to care. If you are a tall woman who won't consider dating shorter men, you are eliminating a lot of great possibilities.

Hell, no. But then I'm 5'2" ...

I’m 5’3” so it’d be uncommon to find a man shorter than I am. I had this hopeless crush on a guy in college who must’ve been 5’6” or possibly shorter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Short men typo come with overcompensating and insecurity issues. Hard pass.

Wow, stereotyping much?

Funny how fat shaming is unacceptable, but it's ok to immediately stereotype a person based off of genetic traits they can't even control. At least you can control body weights. I'm sure every country with shorter people has half the population with automatic insecurity issues just because of their genetics. Lol.

DP, There is actually a syndrome associated with being a short man, it is called napolean complex. PP that loved quite a few short men and filtered others in the process, it is a thing.

Liken it to calling an obese person insecure. You’re not shaming their weight but acknowledging that with obese it’s comes a likelihood for other characteristics (like insecurity).

No, Napoleon Complex is a horrendous stereotype.

A short man stands up for himself or has an opinion = Napoleon Complex. A tall man is abrupt, rude, and loudly opinionated = CEO qualities, alpha male, ideal. It's complete hypocrisy.

I addressed the biases with tall men. More likely to hold dark triad traits

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Short men typo come with overcompensating and insecurity issues. Hard pass.

Wow, stereotyping much?

Funny how fat shaming is unacceptable, but it's ok to immediately stereotype a person based off of genetic traits they can't even control. At least you can control body weights. I'm sure every country with shorter people has half the population with automatic insecurity issues just because of their genetics. Lol.

DP, There is actually a syndrome associated with being a short man, it is called napolean complex. PP that loved quite a few short men and filtered others in the process, it is a thing.

Liken it to calling an obese person insecure. You’re not shaming their weight but acknowledging that with obese it’s comes a likelihood for other characteristics (like insecurity).

No, Napoleon Complex is a horrendous stereotype.

A short man stands up for himself or has an opinion = Napoleon Complex. A tall man is abrupt, rude, and loudly opinionated = CEO qualities, alpha male, ideal. It's complete hypocrisy.

Not true, read the links that discuss more recent research. It is 100% a thing. Not all short people have it —- but some do. My anecdotal experience is one thing but there is plenty of emerging info out around it.

They’re also much more likely to be successful — overcompensating in height. Tall men have the world handed to them (politicians, CEOs, actors) because they project power. Another similar consideration, most CEOs have one od the 3 dark traits. To be powerful, Machiavellian traits are rewarded.

Social science databases can reveal more than a Google search