Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How exactly is it "cowardly"?
You people are absurd.
It's cowardly because they don't want to deal with the backlash from alumni who don't ever want their school to change. beyond trying to save money, that is what they fear.
Ridiculous. They are changing the name and a tiny but vocal minority of alums are pissed off about it. The school does not have $ to spend on a massive rebranding effort so they did the best they could.
So sick of people being so cynical and always looking for the worst in every situation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How exactly is it "cowardly"?
You people are absurd.
It's cowardly because they don't want to deal with the backlash from alumni who don't ever want their school to change. beyond trying to save money, that is what they fear.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How exactly is it "cowardly"?
You people are absurd.
It's cowardly because they don't want to deal with the backlash from alumni who don't ever want their school to change. beyond trying to save money, that is what they fear.
Anonymous wrote:How exactly is it "cowardly"?
You people are absurd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This whole thread is a microcosm example of the limits of the far left liberal position on most things. It consistently ignoring the practical implications of policy decisions. And, at the same time refuse to consider the opinions of others who disagree.
Disagreeing with an opinion is not the same as refusing to consider it. I disagree with the decision while seeing that there are monetary benefits to not having to change the name on everything. But I still think a thoughtful consideration of changing the name to someone who has a connection to DC outweighs the costs, especially since this isn't the type of thing that is done all the time,
Anonymous wrote:This whole thread is a microcosm example of the limits of the far left liberal position on most things. It consistently ignoring the practical implications of policy decisions. And, at the same time refuse to consider the opinions of others who disagree.
Anonymous wrote:This whole thread is a microcosm example of the limits of the far left liberal position on most things. It consistently ignoring the practical implications of policy decisions. And, at the same time refuse to consider the opinions of others who disagree.