Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This idiot failed repeatedly to follow basic commands. The cops did sctew up at times ny giving conflicting commands.
He was pepper sprayed while calmly sitting in his car, with his hands outside the window, just after asking why he was being detained. That is indefensible.
He had been sitting there arguing with the cops for a good long while by that point.
He had every opportunity to not be an idiot, and at each decision point chose idiot.
If you don't want a tense confrontation with the cops, obey directions, don't argue, don't resist.
Was the smart thing to reach to his waist and unbuckle his seatbelt? I would be scared. At least with his hands out of the car, he made sure he was not a threat.
They never even bothered to tell him why they were pulling him over. If they had, he could say "there's a license plate in my window."
Yes, since they were telling him to do that. Imagine if he had just announced he was undoing his seat belt, done so, opened the door, and gotten out slowly with his hands in view. It isn't complicated nor difficult.
Arguing with the cops is stupid.
You don't know what they think they are doing. You may be innocent. Maybe the cops have the wrong guy...but if the guy they are looking for just shot some people, they are going to be ready for the worst.
So lose the attitude. Don't play lawyer and tell the cops what they are allowed to direct you to do. (Especially when you are wrong. ) Don't argue. Don't resist them.
Just do as directed, slowly, and keep your hands in view.
Again they aggressively gave conflicting commands. They approached him in an unprofessional manner. The supervisor was apologetic but patronizing and they let him go without even a ticket because he did nothing wrong. The older officer also threatens to ruin his military career by falsifying what happened during the encounter.
White racists really love to gaslight black people, accusing them of just not following orders even with video footage stating otherwise (i.e. Philando Castile).
Let me guess, you think Chauvin should be acquitted?
Ah, we are back to calling people racists without any evidence whatsoever.
BTW, the second officer is named "Gutierrez," so... doesn't quite fit the narrative of the omg -white- small town cop.
My evidence is your comments.
Do you really think a white person with a Spanish last name can't be racist or anti-black? Try visiting Miami.
I have no problem believing someone of any race could be racist, but absent evidence that they are racist I don't assume it.
The point is you and others obsessed with race want the cops to be white because it allows you to vilify them more easily. "Hispanic cop pulls over black motorist" just does have the same ring to it for you and we both know it.
Both cops are white. One is a white Hispanic. The driver is an Afro-Latino. Plenty of white Hispanic cops have shot black people, like Philando Castile's killer. Here is a link to colorism/racism in the Latino community for your education.
https://hiplatina.com/colorism-within-the-latino-community/
The cops vilified themselves with their demonic behavior. I'm just calling it out.
Ah, "demonic," I kind of wondered what would come after calling everyone racist was no longer sufficiently strong invective.
Good to know that white Hispanics are plenty white enough when they need to be to fit the narrative.
White Hispanics have always been white. I don't think you understand that your race can't be Hispanic. Hispanic just means he is of Spanish-speaking origin. He is clearly a white man from the picture I posted.
You called a military officer an idiot for asking why he was pulled over and not immediately responding to conflicting demands but your moral compass comes out strong when I call a racist, overzealous, power-hungry cop 'demonic'.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This idiot failed repeatedly to follow basic commands. The cops did sctew up at times ny giving conflicting commands.
He was pepper sprayed while calmly sitting in his car, with his hands outside the window, just after asking why he was being detained. That is indefensible.
He had been sitting there arguing with the cops for a good long while by that point.
He had every opportunity to not be an idiot, and at each decision point chose idiot.
If you don't want a tense confrontation with the cops, obey directions, don't argue, don't resist.
They gave him no reason for approaching him. They just started barking orders in the most aggressive way possible. You clearly are white, aren't you?
I think we definitely need to find more ways to introduce race into this. After all, isn't everything about race?
Yes, yes it is. Every single institution in this country is built on the foundation of white supremacy/superiority and it's time to dismantle oppressive institutional, systemic racism.
![]()
Of course everything, everyone, everywhere, racist.
It is amazing you have survived this long in such a horrible racist place.
My ancestors survived hundreds of years of slavery so yes I have survival in my blood.
There is nobody alive today whose ancestors didn't survive many trials that they might not have.
My ancestors hunted mammoths with stone tipped spears, and I often deal with traffic on my way to the grocery store. We all face our own trials in our own times I guess.
This is the whitest response I've ever heard. My ancestors hunted wild animals as well because it was simply before technology but that's not hundreds of years of slavery. You're white so your ancestors did not go through that, mine did and relatiely recently than hunting mammoths.
I also cannot believe you are comparing slavery and Jim Crow to hunting for food and car traffic. White people intentionally dumb themselves down when discussing racism and racial bias, it's so embarassing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This idiot failed repeatedly to follow basic commands. The cops did sctew up at times ny giving conflicting commands.
He was pepper sprayed while calmly sitting in his car, with his hands outside the window, just after asking why he was being detained. That is indefensible.
He had been sitting there arguing with the cops for a good long while by that point.
He had every opportunity to not be an idiot, and at each decision point chose idiot.
If you don't want a tense confrontation with the cops, obey directions, don't argue, don't resist.
Was the smart thing to reach to his waist and unbuckle his seatbelt? I would be scared. At least with his hands out of the car, he made sure he was not a threat.
They never even bothered to tell him why they were pulling him over. If they had, he could say "there's a license plate in my window."
Yes, since they were telling him to do that. Imagine if he had just announced he was undoing his seat belt, done so, opened the door, and gotten out slowly with his hands in view. It isn't complicated nor difficult.
Arguing with the cops is stupid.
You don't know what they think they are doing. You may be innocent. Maybe the cops have the wrong guy...but if the guy they are looking for just shot some people, they are going to be ready for the worst.
So lose the attitude. Don't play lawyer and tell the cops what they are allowed to direct you to do. (Especially when you are wrong. ) Don't argue. Don't resist them.
Just do as directed, slowly, and keep your hands in view.
Again they aggressively gave conflicting commands. They approached him in an unprofessional manner. The supervisor was apologetic but patronizing and they let him go without even a ticket because he did nothing wrong. The older officer also threatens to ruin his military career by falsifying what happened during the encounter.
White racists really love to gaslight black people, accusing them of just not following orders even with video footage stating otherwise (i.e. Philando Castile).
Let me guess, you think Chauvin should be acquitted?
Ah, we are back to calling people racists without any evidence whatsoever.
BTW, the second officer is named "Gutierrez," so... doesn't quite fit the narrative of the omg -white- small town cop.
My evidence is your comments.
Do you really think a white person with a Spanish last name can't be racist or anti-black? Try visiting Miami.
I have no problem believing someone of any race could be racist, but absent evidence that they are racist I don't assume it.
The point is you and others obsessed with race want the cops to be white because it allows you to vilify them more easily. "Hispanic cop pulls over black motorist" just does have the same ring to it for you and we both know it.
Both cops are white. One is a white Hispanic. The driver is an Afro-Latino. Plenty of white Hispanic cops have shot black people, like Philando Castile's killer. Here is a link to colorism/racism in the Latino community for your education.
https://hiplatina.com/colorism-within-the-latino-community/
The cops vilified themselves with their demonic behavior. I'm just calling it out.
Ah, "demonic," I kind of wondered what would come after calling everyone racist was no longer sufficiently strong invective.
Good to know that white Hispanics are plenty white enough when they need to be to fit the narrative.
Anonymous wrote:As is so often the case with these videos we don't know the full context. What we see in the video is a felony stop where the police officers are approaching the suspect with guns drawn and order the suspect to exit the vehicle. This is not the default approach to a routine traffic stop, which tells us something has transpired before the arrival of the officer wearing the body cam that we have video of.
The suspect is non-compliant and argues at length with the officers that he doesn't have to follow their directives, refuses to leave his vehicle, tells the police to "keep their hands off me," resists arrest, etc.
That the suspect is in the military and in uniform has nothing to do with anything.
Being in uniform doesn't change a thing when you are interacting with the police. Tons of service members get arrested off base for all manner of things in uniform and out. (and yes, largely for traffic violations, drunk driving, etc)
Characterizing this as "white cops harass and pepper spray black Army lieutenant," is characteristic of just how screwed up our society is on race relations right now.
Why insert race into this? Are white cops allowed to enforce the law? Are black army lieutenants obligated to follow the law and obey lawful directives when interacting with the police?
What if the police are -gasp- white, does a black army lieutenant still need to obey their commands at a traffic stop?
There is no evidence that race played a role in this interaction evident in the video.
Finally, he was not "attacked." He refused to comply with the police at length during a traffic stop. He was eventually pepper sprayed, which seemed to prompt him to at least get out of the car, after which point he refused to cooperate further and resisted arrest, before finally being taken into custody. The one officer should be counseled on his language, but this is hardly a case of police brutality.
All the suspect had to do was get out of the car and cooperate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes, since they were telling him to do that. Imagine if he had just announced he was undoing his seat belt, done so, opened the door, and gotten out slowly with his hands in view. It isn't complicated nor difficult. they told him both to show his hands AND unbuckle his seatbelt, which would have meant potentially reaching for a gun...conflicting "orders" what was he supposed to do? And why is there a presumption of malfeasance? If he were white, they would not have pulled him over, much less charged his car with guns showing
Arguing with the cops is stupid.
You don't know what they think they are doing. You may be innocent. Maybe the cops have the wrong guy...but if the guy they are looking for just shot some people, they are going to be ready for the worst. maybe? they pulled over a guy in uniform
So lose the attitude. Don't play lawyer and tell the cops what they are allowed to direct you to do. (Especially when you are wrong. ) Don't argue. Don't resist them.
Just do as directed, slowly, and keep your hands in view.
cletus and barney were in the wrong, their conduct was not that of "protect and defend" - it was aggressive and needlessly hostile.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This idiot failed repeatedly to follow basic commands. The cops did sctew up at times ny giving conflicting commands.
He was pepper sprayed while calmly sitting in his car, with his hands outside the window, just after asking why he was being detained. That is indefensible.
He had been sitting there arguing with the cops for a good long while by that point.
He had every opportunity to not be an idiot, and at each decision point chose idiot.
If you don't want a tense confrontation with the cops, obey directions, don't argue, don't resist.
Was the smart thing to reach to his waist and unbuckle his seatbelt? I would be scared. At least with his hands out of the car, he made sure he was not a threat.
They never even bothered to tell him why they were pulling him over. If they had, he could say "there's a license plate in my window."
Yes, since they were telling him to do that. Imagine if he had just announced he was undoing his seat belt, done so, opened the door, and gotten out slowly with his hands in view. It isn't complicated nor difficult.
Arguing with the cops is stupid.
You don't know what they think they are doing. You may be innocent. Maybe the cops have the wrong guy...but if the guy they are looking for just shot some people, they are going to be ready for the worst.
So lose the attitude. Don't play lawyer and tell the cops what they are allowed to direct you to do. (Especially when you are wrong. ) Don't argue. Don't resist them.
Just do as directed, slowly, and keep your hands in view.
Again they aggressively gave conflicting commands. They approached him in an unprofessional manner. The supervisor was apologetic but patronizing and they let him go without even a ticket because he did nothing wrong. The older officer also threatens to ruin his military career by falsifying what happened during the encounter.
White racists really love to gaslight black people, accusing them of just not following orders even with video footage stating otherwise (i.e. Philando Castile).
Let me guess, you think Chauvin should be acquitted?
Ah, we are back to calling people racists without any evidence whatsoever.
BTW, the second officer is named "Gutierrez," so... doesn't quite fit the narrative of the omg -white- small town cop.
My evidence is your comments.
Do you really think a white person with a Spanish last name can't be racist or anti-black? Try visiting Miami.
I have no problem believing someone of any race could be racist, but absent evidence that they are racist I don't assume it.
The point is you and others obsessed with race want the cops to be white because it allows you to vilify them more easily. "Hispanic cop pulls over black motorist" just does have the same ring to it for you and we both know it.
You know what we really want? Black people to be treated the same as everyone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This idiot failed repeatedly to follow basic commands. The cops did sctew up at times ny giving conflicting commands.
He was pepper sprayed while calmly sitting in his car, with his hands outside the window, just after asking why he was being detained. That is indefensible.
He had been sitting there arguing with the cops for a good long while by that point.
He had every opportunity to not be an idiot, and at each decision point chose idiot.
If you don't want a tense confrontation with the cops, obey directions, don't argue, don't resist.
Was the smart thing to reach to his waist and unbuckle his seatbelt? I would be scared. At least with his hands out of the car, he made sure he was not a threat.
They never even bothered to tell him why they were pulling him over. If they had, he could say "there's a license plate in my window."
Yes, since they were telling him to do that. Imagine if he had just announced he was undoing his seat belt, done so, opened the door, and gotten out slowly with his hands in view. It isn't complicated nor difficult.
Arguing with the cops is stupid.
You don't know what they think they are doing. You may be innocent. Maybe the cops have the wrong guy...but if the guy they are looking for just shot some people, they are going to be ready for the worst.
So lose the attitude. Don't play lawyer and tell the cops what they are allowed to direct you to do. (Especially when you are wrong. ) Don't argue. Don't resist them.
Just do as directed, slowly, and keep your hands in view.
Again they aggressively gave conflicting commands. They approached him in an unprofessional manner. The supervisor was apologetic but patronizing and they let him go without even a ticket because he did nothing wrong. The older officer also threatens to ruin his military career by falsifying what happened during the encounter.
White racists really love to gaslight black people, accusing them of just not following orders even with video footage stating otherwise (i.e. Philando Castile).
Let me guess, you think Chauvin should be acquitted?
Ah, we are back to calling people racists without any evidence whatsoever.
BTW, the second officer is named "Gutierrez," so... doesn't quite fit the narrative of the omg -white- small town cop.
My evidence is your comments.
Do you really think a white person with a Spanish last name can't be racist or anti-black? Try visiting Miami.
I have no problem believing someone of any race could be racist, but absent evidence that they are racist I don't assume it.
The point is you and others obsessed with race want the cops to be white because it allows you to vilify them more easily. "Hispanic cop pulls over black motorist" just does have the same ring to it for you and we both know it.
Both cops are white. One is a white Hispanic. The driver is an Afro-Latino. Plenty of white Hispanic cops have shot black people, like Philando Castile's killer. Here is a link to colorism/racism in the Latino community for your education.
https://hiplatina.com/colorism-within-the-latino-community/
The cops vilified themselves with their demonic behavior. I'm just calling it out.
Anonymous wrote:
Yes, since they were telling him to do that. Imagine if he had just announced he was undoing his seat belt, done so, opened the door, and gotten out slowly with his hands in view. It isn't complicated nor difficult. they told him both to show his hands AND unbuckle his seatbelt, which would have meant potentially reaching for a gun...conflicting "orders" what was he supposed to do? And why is there a presumption of malfeasance? If he were white, they would not have pulled him over, much less charged his car with guns showing
Arguing with the cops is stupid.
You don't know what they think they are doing. You may be innocent. Maybe the cops have the wrong guy...but if the guy they are looking for just shot some people, they are going to be ready for the worst. maybe? they pulled over a guy in uniform
So lose the attitude. Don't play lawyer and tell the cops what they are allowed to direct you to do. (Especially when you are wrong. ) Don't argue. Don't resist them.
Just do as directed, slowly, and keep your hands in view.
cletus and barney were in the wrong, their conduct was not that of "protect and defend" - it was aggressive and needlessly hostile.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This idiot failed repeatedly to follow basic commands. The cops did sctew up at times ny giving conflicting commands.
He was pepper sprayed while calmly sitting in his car, with his hands outside the window, just after asking why he was being detained. That is indefensible.
He had been sitting there arguing with the cops for a good long while by that point.
He had every opportunity to not be an idiot, and at each decision point chose idiot.
If you don't want a tense confrontation with the cops, obey directions, don't argue, don't resist.
They gave him no reason for approaching him. They just started barking orders in the most aggressive way possible. You clearly are white, aren't you?
I think we definitely need to find more ways to introduce race into this. After all, isn't everything about race?
Yes, yes it is. Every single institution in this country is built on the foundation of white supremacy/superiority and it's time to dismantle oppressive institutional, systemic racism.
![]()
Of course everything, everyone, everywhere, racist.
It is amazing you have survived this long in such a horrible racist place.
My ancestors survived hundreds of years of slavery so yes I have survival in my blood.
There is nobody alive today whose ancestors didn't survive many trials that they might not have.
My ancestors hunted mammoths with stone tipped spears, and I often deal with traffic on my way to the grocery store. We all face our own trials in our own times I guess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This idiot failed repeatedly to follow basic commands. The cops did sctew up at times ny giving conflicting commands.
He was pepper sprayed while calmly sitting in his car, with his hands outside the window, just after asking why he was being detained. That is indefensible.
He had been sitting there arguing with the cops for a good long while by that point.
He had every opportunity to not be an idiot, and at each decision point chose idiot.
If you don't want a tense confrontation with the cops, obey directions, don't argue, don't resist.
They gave him no reason for approaching him. They just started barking orders in the most aggressive way possible. You clearly are white, aren't you?
I think we definitely need to find more ways to introduce race into this. After all, isn't everything about race?
Yes, yes it is. Every single institution in this country is built on the foundation of white supremacy/superiority and it's time to dismantle oppressive institutional, systemic racism.
![]()
Of course everything, everyone, everywhere, racist.
It is amazing you have survived this long in such a horrible racist place.
My ancestors survived hundreds of years of slavery so yes I have survival in my blood.
There is nobody alive today whose ancestors didn't survive many trials that they might not have.
My ancestors hunted mammoths with stone tipped spears, and I often deal with traffic on my way to the grocery store. We all face our own trials in our own times I guess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This idiot failed repeatedly to follow basic commands. The cops did sctew up at times ny giving conflicting commands.
He was pepper sprayed while calmly sitting in his car, with his hands outside the window, just after asking why he was being detained. That is indefensible.
He had been sitting there arguing with the cops for a good long while by that point.
He had every opportunity to not be an idiot, and at each decision point chose idiot.
If you don't want a tense confrontation with the cops, obey directions, don't argue, don't resist.
Was the smart thing to reach to his waist and unbuckle his seatbelt? I would be scared. At least with his hands out of the car, he made sure he was not a threat.
They never even bothered to tell him why they were pulling him over. If they had, he could say "there's a license plate in my window."
Yes, since they were telling him to do that. Imagine if he had just announced he was undoing his seat belt, done so, opened the door, and gotten out slowly with his hands in view. It isn't complicated nor difficult.
Arguing with the cops is stupid.
You don't know what they think they are doing. You may be innocent. Maybe the cops have the wrong guy...but if the guy they are looking for just shot some people, they are going to be ready for the worst.
So lose the attitude. Don't play lawyer and tell the cops what they are allowed to direct you to do. (Especially when you are wrong. ) Don't argue. Don't resist them.
Just do as directed, slowly, and keep your hands in view.
Again they aggressively gave conflicting commands. They approached him in an unprofessional manner. The supervisor was apologetic but patronizing and they let him go without even a ticket because he did nothing wrong. The older officer also threatens to ruin his military career by falsifying what happened during the encounter.
White racists really love to gaslight black people, accusing them of just not following orders even with video footage stating otherwise (i.e. Philando Castile).
Let me guess, you think Chauvin should be acquitted?
Ah, we are back to calling people racists without any evidence whatsoever.
BTW, the second officer is named "Gutierrez," so... doesn't quite fit the narrative of the omg -white- small town cop.
My evidence is your comments.
Do you really think a white person with a Spanish last name can't be racist or anti-black? Try visiting Miami.
I have no problem believing someone of any race could be racist, but absent evidence that they are racist I don't assume it.
The point is you and others obsessed with race want the cops to be white because it allows you to vilify them more easily. "Hispanic cop pulls over black motorist" just does have the same ring to it for you and we both know it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This idiot failed repeatedly to follow basic commands. The cops did sctew up at times ny giving conflicting commands.
He was pepper sprayed while calmly sitting in his car, with his hands outside the window, just after asking why he was being detained. That is indefensible.
He had been sitting there arguing with the cops for a good long while by that point.
He had every opportunity to not be an idiot, and at each decision point chose idiot.
If you don't want a tense confrontation with the cops, obey directions, don't argue, don't resist.
Was the smart thing to reach to his waist and unbuckle his seatbelt? I would be scared. At least with his hands out of the car, he made sure he was not a threat.
They never even bothered to tell him why they were pulling him over. If they had, he could say "there's a license plate in my window."
Yes, since they were telling him to do that. Imagine if he had just announced he was undoing his seat belt, done so, opened the door, and gotten out slowly with his hands in view. It isn't complicated nor difficult.
Arguing with the cops is stupid.
You don't know what they think they are doing. You may be innocent. Maybe the cops have the wrong guy...but if the guy they are looking for just shot some people, they are going to be ready for the worst.
So lose the attitude. Don't play lawyer and tell the cops what they are allowed to direct you to do. (Especially when you are wrong. ) Don't argue. Don't resist them.
Just do as directed, slowly, and keep your hands in view.
Again they aggressively gave conflicting commands. They approached him in an unprofessional manner. The supervisor was apologetic but patronizing and they let him go without even a ticket because he did nothing wrong. The older officer also threatens to ruin his military career by falsifying what happened during the encounter.
White racists really love to gaslight black people, accusing them of just not following orders even with video footage stating otherwise (i.e. Philando Castile).
Let me guess, you think Chauvin should be acquitted?
Ah, we are back to calling people racists without any evidence whatsoever.
BTW, the second officer is named "Gutierrez," so... doesn't quite fit the narrative of the omg -white- small town cop.
My evidence is your comments.
Do you really think a white person with a Spanish last name can't be racist or anti-black? Try visiting Miami.
I have no problem believing someone of any race could be racist, but absent evidence that they are racist I don't assume it.
The point is you and others obsessed with race want the cops to be white because it allows you to vilify them more easily. "Hispanic cop pulls over black motorist" just does have the same ring to it for you and we both know it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This idiot failed repeatedly to follow basic commands. The cops did sctew up at times ny giving conflicting commands.
He was pepper sprayed while calmly sitting in his car, with his hands outside the window, just after asking why he was being detained. That is indefensible.
He had been sitting there arguing with the cops for a good long while by that point.
He had every opportunity to not be an idiot, and at each decision point chose idiot.
If you don't want a tense confrontation with the cops, obey directions, don't argue, don't resist.
They gave him no reason for approaching him. They just started barking orders in the most aggressive way possible. You clearly are white, aren't you?
I think we definitely need to find more ways to introduce race into this. After all, isn't everything about race?
Yes, yes it is. Every single institution in this country is built on the foundation of white supremacy/superiority and it's time to dismantle oppressive institutional, systemic racism.
![]()
Of course everything, everyone, everywhere, racist.
It is amazing you have survived this long in such a horrible racist place.
My ancestors survived hundreds of years of slavery so yes I have survival in my blood.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This idiot failed repeatedly to follow basic commands. The cops did sctew up at times ny giving conflicting commands.
He was pepper sprayed while calmly sitting in his car, with his hands outside the window, just after asking why he was being detained. That is indefensible.
He had been sitting there arguing with the cops for a good long while by that point.
He had every opportunity to not be an idiot, and at each decision point chose idiot.
If you don't want a tense confrontation with the cops, obey directions, don't argue, don't resist.
Was the smart thing to reach to his waist and unbuckle his seatbelt? I would be scared. At least with his hands out of the car, he made sure he was not a threat.
They never even bothered to tell him why they were pulling him over. If they had, he could say "there's a license plate in my window."
Yes, since they were telling him to do that. Imagine if he had just announced he was undoing his seat belt, done so, opened the door, and gotten out slowly with his hands in view. It isn't complicated nor difficult.
Arguing with the cops is stupid.
You don't know what they think they are doing. You may be innocent. Maybe the cops have the wrong guy...but if the guy they are looking for just shot some people, they are going to be ready for the worst.
So lose the attitude. Don't play lawyer and tell the cops what they are allowed to direct you to do. (Especially when you are wrong. ) Don't argue. Don't resist them.
Just do as directed, slowly, and keep your hands in view.
Again they aggressively gave conflicting commands. They approached him in an unprofessional manner. The supervisor was apologetic but patronizing and they let him go without even a ticket because he did nothing wrong. The older officer also threatens to ruin his military career by falsifying what happened during the encounter.
White racists really love to gaslight black people, accusing them of just not following orders even with video footage stating otherwise (i.e. Philando Castile).
Let me guess, you think Chauvin should be acquitted?
Ah, we are back to calling people racists without any evidence whatsoever.
BTW, the second officer is named "Gutierrez," so... doesn't quite fit the narrative of the omg -white- small town cop.
My evidence is your comments.
Do you really think a white person with a Spanish last name can't be racist or anti-black? Try visiting Miami.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This idiot failed repeatedly to follow basic commands. The cops did sctew up at times ny giving conflicting commands.
He was pepper sprayed while calmly sitting in his car, with his hands outside the window, just after asking why he was being detained. That is indefensible.
He had been sitting there arguing with the cops for a good long while by that point.
He had every opportunity to not be an idiot, and at each decision point chose idiot.
If you don't want a tense confrontation with the cops, obey directions, don't argue, don't resist.
They gave him no reason for approaching him. They just started barking orders in the most aggressive way possible. You clearly are white, aren't you?
I think we definitely need to find more ways to introduce race into this. After all, isn't everything about race?
Yes, yes it is. Every single institution in this country is built on the foundation of white supremacy/superiority and it's time to dismantle oppressive institutional, systemic racism.
![]()
Of course everything, everyone, everywhere, racist.
It is amazing you have survived this long in such a horrible racist place.