You'll get there faster if you walk
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s for pedestrian safety.
Most pedestrian deaths in MoCo are people running across huge streets in the middle of a block, often wearing dark clothes at night.
Anonymous wrote:
Yhere are well known streaches of the buzy streets where people cross more and die.
If a city would try and put a painted signs alonf the curbs there;
Crossing here is illegal. Fine; 100 Dollars
Crossing here after dark, fine doubles. 200 Dollars.
Di you want to bet that the deaths would not dissappear>
Ad to this.. note that this area is monitored by pedestrian camera and police will show up if find you crossing and no life will be lost ever again.
MONEY is what keeps us safer from the speeders on the road and money could keep walkers safe from their risky behaviour.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm all for the lower speed limits.
Lowered speed limits are impractical in many areas. Doing 25/35 on four-lane Georgia Ave heading toward Aspen Hill is ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s for pedestrian safety.
Most pedestrian deaths in MoCo are people running across huge streets in the middle of a block, often wearing dark clothes at night.
Someone did this to me last year on 355 in front of the Best Buy store. I didn't hit them but it scared the crap out of me and I was pretty mad that they would run across Rockville Pike at night wearing all black. Why do people do this (and I mean this question seriously)?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think we need a lot more restrictions. Bethesda is still a deathtrap for cyclists and pedestrians. At the type of density we are now at, it does not make sense for everything to be built for cars rather than people.
People are in cars and with the amount of density that MoCo is allowing, there needs to be common sense regarding roads. I'm not suggesting pedestrians and cyclists take a back seat, but with more cars moving through the roads, The Powers That Be need to do a better job with traffic for everyone. Simply reducing speed limits is not the answer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s for pedestrian safety.
Most pedestrian deaths in MoCo are people running across huge streets in the middle of a block, often wearing dark clothes at night.
Anonymous wrote:While the roads display millions of signs for drivers, there are virtually ZERO signs for perestrians on the sidewalks rhat warn, inform or alert them just like they do for drivers.
There should be painted signs along the curd in the jay walk areas stating and informing that Jaywlking is illeegal, dangerous, can result in death and will result in fines on a good day if you make it in the other side safely..
We live in the HEAVY populated area with lots of people coming to visit or live from abroad who are used to crossing the street wherever and do not realize the dangers or illegality of this.
Bo. the creepy buss stop ads do not work as they are NOT in the right places for one, and for two the penalty of fine is often greater deterrant then ridiculous picture of a person with yhe tire mark on the face.
Yhere are well known streaches of the buzy streets where people cross more and die.
If a city would try and put a painted signs alonf the curbs there;
Crossing here is illegal. Fine; 100 Dollars
Crossing here after dark, fine doubles. 200 Dollars.
Di you want to bet that the deaths would not dissappear>
Ad to this.. note that this area is monitored by pedestrian camera and police will show up if find you crossing and no life will be lost ever again.
MONEY is what keeps us safer from the speeders on the road and money could keep walkers safe from their risky behaviour.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm all for the lower speed limits.
Lowered speed limits are impractical in many areas. Doing 25/35 on four-lane Georgia Ave heading toward Aspen Hill is ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s for pedestrian safety.
Most pedestrian deaths in MoCo are people running across huge streets in the middle of a block, often wearing dark clothes at night.
You're right. We need even lower speed limits.
No. We need fewer dumbasses running across busy roads in the dark wearing dark clothing.
My local neighborhood wants lower speed limits so it is safer to walk in the street.
This is a bad pandemic habit that needs to go. People just stare at you as you try to drive down the street, like "How dare you drive on my spacious walking path?!"
This was pre covid-19. We don't have sidewalks. Instead of giving up some right of way for sidewalks, the decision is reduce traffic speeds and add as many stop signs as possible.
Seems like it would be a lot safer to just take 7 feet of people's front yards and make a sidewalk. Then no one needs to walk in the street.
-cue DCUM’rs clutching their pearls about their property values....
Yes, I don't understand this, in terms of equity. I have to give an easement at the front of my property for this public good, why doesn't everyone?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s for pedestrian safety.
Most pedestrian deaths in MoCo are people running across huge streets in the middle of a block, often wearing dark clothes at night.
You're right. We need even lower speed limits.
No. We need fewer dumbasses running across busy roads in the dark wearing dark clothing.
My local neighborhood wants lower speed limits so it is safer to walk in the street.
This is a bad pandemic habit that needs to go. People just stare at you as you try to drive down the street, like "How dare you drive on my spacious walking path?!"
This was pre covid-19. We don't have sidewalks. Instead of giving up some right of way for sidewalks, the decision is reduce traffic speeds and add as many stop signs as possible.
Seems like it would be a lot safer to just take 7 feet of people's front yards and make a sidewalk. Then no one needs to walk in the street.
-cue DCUM’rs clutching their pearls about their property values....
Anonymous wrote:I'm all for the lower speed limits.
Anonymous wrote:It's about Vision zero, and pedestrian safety.
And Casey Anderson, Planning Board Chair, wanting everyone to bike or take public transit, and not use their cars (County Council too). The plan is to make driving so bad, everyone either leaves, uses an alternative means of transportation.
I think the most ridiculous part is the three quarters of a mile that they shrunk Old Georgetown Road from three lanes to two. That's already bad, going to be a disaster when everyone heads back to the office.
Anonymous wrote:I'm all for the lower speed limits.