Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree on it not being universal too. Maybe there is some of that parity at the youngest age groups but that will be shot-lived. For the PP asking if it’s official yes, as another PP alluded their kids team moved to NCSL. BRYC has at least a dozen ODSL teams that will be moved to NCSL for spring. I’m sure other leagues same deal is taking place.
So will we see more inclusion of the BRYC former ODSL teams with the Elite Academy teams? Same league , some in higher divisions, some higher ranked state and nationally than Elite Academy. Or will they again be treated like the red headed step children?
Exactly how should a C or D team expect to be treated?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree on it not being universal too. Maybe there is some of that parity at the youngest age groups but that will be shot-lived. For the PP asking if it’s official yes, as another PP alluded their kids team moved to NCSL. BRYC has at least a dozen ODSL teams that will be moved to NCSL for spring. I’m sure other leagues same deal is taking place.
So will we see more inclusion of the BRYC former ODSL teams with the Elite Academy teams? Same league , some in higher divisions, some higher ranked state and nationally than Elite Academy. Or will they again be treated like the red headed step children?
Exactly how should a C or D team expect to be treated?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree on it not being universal too. Maybe there is some of that parity at the youngest age groups but that will be shot-lived. For the PP asking if it’s official yes, as another PP alluded their kids team moved to NCSL. BRYC has at least a dozen ODSL teams that will be moved to NCSL for spring. I’m sure other leagues same deal is taking place.
So will we see more inclusion of the BRYC former ODSL teams with the Elite Academy teams? Same league , some in higher divisions, some higher ranked state and nationally than Elite Academy. Or will they again be treated like the red headed step children?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree on it not being universal too. Maybe there is some of that parity at the youngest age groups but that will be shot-lived. For the PP asking if it’s official yes, as another PP alluded their kids team moved to NCSL. BRYC has at least a dozen ODSL teams that will be moved to NCSL for spring. I’m sure other leagues same deal is taking place.
So will we see more inclusion of the BRYC former ODSL teams with the Elite Academy teams? Same league , some in higher divisions, some higher ranked state and nationally than Elite Academy. Or will they again be treated like the red headed step children?
Just curious what inclusion means here, why can't anyone on the BRYC rec teams join the Elite Academy? As I understand it the Elite Academy teams only play in NCSL at U12 and older and it is their composite teams playing a year up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree on it not being universal too. Maybe there is some of that parity at the youngest age groups but that will be shot-lived. For the PP asking if it’s official yes, as another PP alluded their kids team moved to NCSL. BRYC has at least a dozen ODSL teams that will be moved to NCSL for spring. I’m sure other leagues same deal is taking place.
So will we see more inclusion of the BRYC former ODSL teams with the Elite Academy teams? Same league , some in higher divisions, some higher ranked state and nationally than Elite Academy. Or will they again be treated like the red headed step children?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree on it not being universal too. Maybe there is some of that parity at the youngest age groups but that will be shot-lived. For the PP asking if it’s official yes, as another PP alluded their kids team moved to NCSL. BRYC has at least a dozen ODSL teams that will be moved to NCSL for spring. I’m sure other leagues same deal is taking place.
So will we see more inclusion of the BRYC former ODSL teams with the Elite Academy teams? Same league , some in higher divisions, some higher ranked state and nationally than Elite Academy. Or will they again be treated like the red headed step children?
If your kid has a good coach and is having fun, why does it matter?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree on it not being universal too. Maybe there is some of that parity at the youngest age groups but that will be shot-lived. For the PP asking if it’s official yes, as another PP alluded their kids team moved to NCSL. BRYC has at least a dozen ODSL teams that will be moved to NCSL for spring. I’m sure other leagues same deal is taking place.
So will we see more inclusion of the BRYC former ODSL teams with the Elite Academy teams? Same league , some in higher divisions, some higher ranked state and nationally than Elite Academy. Or will they again be treated like the red headed step children?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree on it not being universal too. Maybe there is some of that parity at the youngest age groups but that will be shot-lived. For the PP asking if it’s official yes, as another PP alluded their kids team moved to NCSL. BRYC has at least a dozen ODSL teams that will be moved to NCSL for spring. I’m sure other leagues same deal is taking place.
So will we see more inclusion of the BRYC former ODSL teams with the Elite Academy teams? Same league , some in higher divisions, some higher ranked state and nationally than Elite Academy. Or will they again be treated like the red headed step children?
Anonymous wrote:Agree on it not being universal too. Maybe there is some of that parity at the youngest age groups but that will be shot-lived. For the PP asking if it’s official yes, as another PP alluded their kids team moved to NCSL. BRYC has at least a dozen ODSL teams that will be moved to NCSL for spring. I’m sure other leagues same deal is taking place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like the bridge teams are they way to go at BRYC.
BRYC parent here. It’s about what’s you want for your DD out of soccer. Bridge is a good setup if you happen to get a good coach and want a more recreational experience. It’s cheap and the commitment and talent level reflects this but a great program and they are competitive in NCSL. The elite academy teams (Pre-ECNL) also play in NCSL but usually at an age up at u12 playing in u13 and at a lower level so they can start early at 11v11.
BN runs the girls academy, which usually has enough girls for two teams per age group, and he is a bit rough around the edges and spread thin but a great coach, emotionally invested in his teams and his girls love him. Yes, we have seen a few girls drop down to the bridge teams. Their parents chose to go down as they knew that what was best for their DD or were in the unfortunate position of being a borderline 1st team player with parents who couldn’t see through the parent goggles of where their DD really stood talent wise and blame politics. If you know BN, he doesn’t play that. He has his favorites that are high performers but is allergic to any parent who tries the “I think my DD should be the starting striker, why are you playing her in defense “ type of influence on the team, even with his favorite high performers.
In the academy ages (u8-u12), there is constant competition for a 1st team slot. Some kids and parents like this, others don’t and leave for less competitive environments. I think bryc’s challenge is that the academy setup allows for movement between top and 2nd teams. Some think the movement should be mandatory and are not happy when they realize it’s performance based and their DD doesn’t get the call up, which I can understand is frustrating as the cost and time commitments are equal.
We are playing with the boys teams and I would say its quite different. The older boys we see the bridge teams very competitive with academy teams even ranked higher in some age groups.
Same with some of the girls teams.
Anonymous wrote:so any official announcement yet? or is this all a rumor?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like the bridge teams are they way to go at BRYC.
BRYC parent here. It’s about what’s you want for your DD out of soccer. Bridge is a good setup if you happen to get a good coach and want a more recreational experience. It’s cheap and the commitment and talent level reflects this but a great program and they are competitive in NCSL. The elite academy teams (Pre-ECNL) also play in NCSL but usually at an age up at u12 playing in u13 and at a lower level so they can start early at 11v11.
BN runs the girls academy, which usually has enough girls for two teams per age group, and he is a bit rough around the edges and spread thin but a great coach, emotionally invested in his teams and his girls love him. Yes, we have seen a few girls drop down to the bridge teams. Their parents chose to go down as they knew that what was best for their DD or were in the unfortunate position of being a borderline 1st team player with parents who couldn’t see through the parent goggles of where their DD really stood talent wise and blame politics. If you know BN, he doesn’t play that. He has his favorites that are high performers but is allergic to any parent who tries the “I think my DD should be the starting striker, why are you playing her in defense “ type of influence on the team, even with his favorite high performers.
In the academy ages (u8-u12), there is constant competition for a 1st team slot. Some kids and parents like this, others don’t and leave for less competitive environments. I think bryc’s challenge is that the academy setup allows for movement between top and 2nd teams. Some think the movement should be mandatory and are not happy when they realize it’s performance based and their DD doesn’t get the call up, which I can understand is frustrating as the cost and time commitments are equal.
We are playing with the boys teams and I would say its quite different. The older boys we see the bridge teams very competitive with academy teams even ranked higher in some age groups.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like the bridge teams are they way to go at BRYC.
BRYC parent here. It’s about what’s you want for your DD out of soccer. Bridge is a good setup if you happen to get a good coach and want a more recreational experience. It’s cheap and the commitment and talent level reflects this but a great program and they are competitive in NCSL. The elite academy teams (Pre-ECNL) also play in NCSL but usually at an age up at u12 playing in u13 and at a lower level so they can start early at 11v11.
BN runs the girls academy, which usually has enough girls for two teams per age group, and he is a bit rough around the edges and spread thin but a great coach, emotionally invested in his teams and his girls love him. Yes, we have seen a few girls drop down to the bridge teams. Their parents chose to go down as they knew that what was best for their DD or were in the unfortunate position of being a borderline 1st team player with parents who couldn’t see through the parent goggles of where their DD really stood talent wise and blame politics. If you know BN, he doesn’t play that. He has his favorites that are high performers but is allergic to any parent who tries the “I think my DD should be the starting striker, why are you playing her in defense “ type of influence on the team, even with his favorite high performers.
In the academy ages (u8-u12), there is constant competition for a 1st team slot. Some kids and parents like this, others don’t and leave for less competitive environments. I think bryc’s challenge is that the academy setup allows for movement between top and 2nd teams. Some think the movement should be mandatory and are not happy when they realize it’s performance based and their DD doesn’t get the call up, which I can understand is frustrating as the cost and time commitments are equal.