Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So weird. It’s almost like all the teachers on here were telling you this, but you preferred to believe the trolls and echo chamber.

https://twitter.com/perrystein/status/1359231923755827202?s=21

Psh, I know right. And yet many parents on this forum were like you evil witch teachers are going to strike!!! No ma'am.

your union **held a vote** on whether to strike. for the life of me I can’t understand how you turn this around to somehow prove something about parents? if you’re mad at the perception that teachers might strike, maybe ... I dunno ... blame the Union that call the strike vote?

No it wasn’t a vote to strike. It was a vote to allow the executive committee to discuss a strike. They were not going to say yes to a strike.

But it still seems like more parents are upset about this than teachers

Are you the union's useless lawyer?

Nope. Just a useless teacher

Well, if not useless, then clueless. Here's what the judge said:

"Judge asked the union lawyer if members are voting on a strike. Lawyer says they're voting this morning on potential authorization of a strike -- not a strike, just a first step. The judge called that "semantics" and dismissed the court and will resume after the vote."

So it is a distinction without difference.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So weird. It’s almost like all the teachers on here were telling you this, but you preferred to believe the trolls and echo chamber.

https://twitter.com/perrystein/status/1359231923755827202?s=21

Psh, I know right. And yet many parents on this forum were like you evil witch teachers are going to strike!!! No ma'am.

your union **held a vote** on whether to strike. for the life of me I can’t understand how you turn this around to somehow prove something about parents? if you’re mad at the perception that teachers might strike, maybe ... I dunno ... blame the Union that call the strike vote?

No it wasn’t a vote to strike. It was a vote to allow the executive committee to discuss a strike. They were not going to say yes to a strike.

But it still seems like more parents are upset about this than teachers

Are you the union's useless lawyer?

Nope. Just a useless teacher

Do you support your union leadership?