Anonymous wrote:DC either needs to declare that PK is a required grade or cut it altogether. If PK is such a priority then the District can make that official. Otherwise, tell parents to figure out PS3 and PK for themselves, like generations have done before them. Kindergarten used to be half-day! You decide to have children, you need to have a plan, and a back-up plan. If you want public education to be your only plan, get ready to be a tireless advocate.
Anonymous wrote:Reading up on the history of preK in DC: the city, experts and teachers back then agreed it was a crucial way of reducing achievement and opportunity gaps in school, improving children’s academic and social and emotional development and many more benefits that go way beyond the resentful idea that parents only want "free daycare."
Try doing virtual DL with a 3 or 4-year-old, it's useless.
This thread was not meant to debate whether there should be full time preK3 in the fall. It's about whether there will be full time preK or not, and how we can best plan for a different scenario.
Those who want to debate the usefulness of preK & if they should be given priority or not in reopening plans can start their own thread.
Parents of toddlers commenting here know very well the importance of having preK and are looking for information and support to plan ahead of time.
Anonymous wrote:Unpopular opinion- but there should not be. PreK should be half day and housed at rec centers. The amount of time and energy that is poured into ECE is not equitable or fair to other grades.
Love,
Your 6 figure ECE teacher
Anonymous wrote:PK deserves full class but half days. You don't need to do nap time at the school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We won't know for a while, we don't even know how long the vaccine lasts.
And why a whole thread on PK?? All kids should have school in person.
Because when PK parents post in more general threads, people yell at us “Pk isn’t mandatory! Who cares? Let’s talk about the grades that actually matter!”
Of course all kids deserve to be in school, but it’s ok for PK parents to have a thread discussing concerns unique to them.
This x1000. Pay for daycare for another year.
What about my self contained pre-k child? I’ve seen more results with online school than his toddler day care! So FU. Pre-K deserves to be in person too!
Every child deserves to be in school in person, to be clear. But PK is a privilege, it's not a right. This is true even in non-pandemic years. No one is guaranteed a Pk spot. We are lucky to have PK spots available in this city, but they are not guaranteed. I can't speak for self-contained PK, I have no idea what the rights are for that.
What I'm tired of is PK parents taking up time and resources at my kids' school when they should be focusing those resources on getting K-5 back in person.
(Also, try to be a bigger person and don't curse out opinions you don't agree with.)
The fact that PK is not a required grade does not mean it isn't a grade that is supported by DC. We all pay taxes in DC, presumably you got free PK for your kids while they were younger. No one is stealing resources and PK parents are absolutely in their rights to want their kids to go back as well.
This.
Disagree. If 3-6’ distancing requirements mean additional classrooms are needed to accommodate students K and older, then we need to use the PK3 and PK4 classrooms to accommodate the maximum IPL number of K and older students. Period. K and up is compulsory, younger is not. Frankly I can’t believe that the littlest ones are back at school first. It’s completely backwards.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I take back my words about making a PK thread. It’s insane how some people think that PK teachers would sit back and teach other grades in the first place.
Or they haven’t lived here long enough to figure out how much value DCPS places in PK.
Or the value of starting school at this age, especially for children with special needs, HUGE gains can be made in PK. For people who ‘follow science’ they sure don’t know a lock about education.
I’m the PP who hit a nerve. I have two children in DCPS. My younger one is special needs and has had interventions since a toddler. He is now 10 and has an IEP because, even though interventions at the PK level help, most of these children need services long term. Schools absolutely cannot meet IEP requirements in a virtual setting that my child, and many other children, have and need. And let me tell you, for a lot of SN children the stakes are much higher at 10/12/15 years old than at 3. I’m living this nightmare and don’t wish it on anyone. But the focus needs to be on older kids getting back in the classroom first. The stakes are much higher, SN or not. It may not be a politically acceptable argument on DCUM, but it is reality that many of us live, and at this time when resources are scarce, hard and unpopular decisions need to be made.
My jaw is dropping at this poster who had early intervention for her kid, admits that interventions at the PK level help, and still thinks that her older kids should be prioritized over younger kids because "for a lot of SN kids the stakes are much higher."
I’m here. My child did not qualify for city services so I paid for private. Guess what. He needs more now. And now qualifies.
I’m done arguing. Good luck to you all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I take back my words about making a PK thread. It’s insane how some people think that PK teachers would sit back and teach other grades in the first place.
Or they haven’t lived here long enough to figure out how much value DCPS places in PK.
Or the value of starting school at this age, especially for children with special needs, HUGE gains can be made in PK. For people who ‘follow science’ they sure don’t know a lock about education.
I’m the PP who hit a nerve. I have two children in DCPS. My younger one is special needs and has had interventions since a toddler. He is now 10 and has an IEP because, even though interventions at the PK level help, most of these children need services long term. Schools absolutely cannot meet IEP requirements in a virtual setting that my child, and many other children, have and need. And let me tell you, for a lot of SN children the stakes are much higher at 10/12/15 years old than at 3. I’m living this nightmare and don’t wish it on anyone. But the focus needs to be on older kids getting back in the classroom first. The stakes are much higher, SN or not. It may not be a politically acceptable argument on DCUM, but it is reality that many of us live, and at this time when resources are scarce, hard and unpopular decisions need to be made.
My jaw is dropping at this poster who had early intervention for her kid, admits that interventions at the PK level help, and still thinks that her older kids should be prioritized over younger kids because "for a lot of SN kids the stakes are much higher."