Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m on our swim team board for a large team. There is no way we would have real A meets and no B meets. That would be unfair to the vast majority of our swimmers. Only letting the strongest swimmers have the fun of a meet? That’s a non starter for me. If we can’t run B meets we won’t do As either.
You are letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. Maybe having only A meets would motivate the B swimmers to work harder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can’t imagine letting teams mix at any kind of meet but I can see having practice time for different age groups within the team.
Teams could swim at their home pools and then the data from the two teams merged.
This idea was floated last spring before we knew what we were in for. I’m hoping for creative thinking like this if we can’t have limited capacity dual meets.
Anonymous wrote:The larger swim clubs need B swimmer revenue to cover the costs of coaches etc. so it’s difficult to offer only A meets. If A meets are happening, it’s difficult to tell crazy A swim families that the pool is sitting out the season. It’s a quandary.
Anonymous wrote:I’m on our swim team board for a large team. There is no way we would have real A meets and no B meets. That would be unfair to the vast majority of our swimmers. Only letting the strongest swimmers have the fun of a meet? That’s a non starter for me. If we can’t run B meets we won’t do As either.
Anonymous wrote:I’m on our swim team board for a large team. There is no way we would have real A meets and no B meets. That would be unfair to the vast majority of our swimmers. Only letting the strongest swimmers have the fun of a meet? That’s a non starter for me. If we can’t run B meets we won’t do As either.
Anonymous wrote:I’m on our swim team board for a large team. There is no way we would have real A meets and no B meets. That would be unfair to the vast majority of our swimmers. Only letting the strongest swimmers have the fun of a meet? That’s a non starter for me. If we can’t run B meets we won’t do As either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can’t imagine letting teams mix at any kind of meet but I can see having practice time for different age groups within the team.
Teams could swim at their home pools and then the data from the two teams merged.
It would still be complicated with large teams of 200+ kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone from my pool is on the nvsl reopen committee. IMO - he is awesome & I think he will try to get us able to do whatever Northam allows.
NVSL needs to give direction to the pools and standardize something for all the teams. Crossing fingers.
what kind of direction and standardization do you think should happen? Pools did a lot of different things last summer depending on the comfort level of the board/ physical layout of the pool/ membership, etc. e.g. some pools put out furniture others did not. Some pools sectioned off the pool and made people stick to a section, others did not. Some pools made everybody vacate after a time period to engage in some hygiene theater, others did not.
Obviously there are rules the NVSL puts forth with regard to swim meets, how many timers to have, qualifications of the referee, etc. This is within their 'swim lane.' But it would be highly inappropriate for the NVSL to start dictating to pools further directions that go beyond Phase 3 guidance (or whatever Phase we are in this summer.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can’t imagine letting teams mix at any kind of meet but I can see having practice time for different age groups within the team.
Teams could swim at their home pools and then the data from the two teams merged.
Anonymous wrote:I can’t imagine letting teams mix at any kind of meet but I can see having practice time for different age groups within the team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can’t imagine letting teams mix at any kind of meet but I can see having practice time for different age groups within the team.
Teams could swim at their home pools and then the data from the two teams merged.
It would still be complicated with large teams of 200+ kids.