The people who think it's the brother base it on his weird interview and that he hit her once with a golf club, even though the hit occurred when he was actually swinging not aiming for her and the hit was not enough to cause significant trauma.

They also ignore other evidence.

Kids kill, but it's not common, not as common as mothers who abuse and kill their kids for example.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay lets pretend DNA is not a thing. What makes more sense?

8 yo brother fashioned a garrote strangled his sister and sexually assaulted her. After the fact, mom and dad covered it up by pashing her head in m using a stun gun and writing a note to make it seem real

or

Mom and dad were allowing the kids to be abused and one ended up dead and they coverd it up.

Are you dense or intentionally obtuse?

You have the order of things all.backwards. There's an extensive Reddit on this case if you want to get up to speed.

Her head was bashed, but that's not what killed her. She was strangled for approximately 45 minutes to 2 hours.

There was also evidence of sexual abuse prior to the trauma from the evening.

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's a duck.

What would mom and dad gain from covering up for their son? he was 8/9 at the time he wouldn't have been charged.

He bashed her head. Why not take her to the hospital she could have maybe been saved. There may have been a CPS investigation.

Why would they choose an alternative of staging a kidnapping and murder and still inviting scrutiny into the home?

I think there must have been sex abuse by the father or outside men. What about the dc case recently that was mentioned in the real estate forum where the house is listed for $$$ and the dad, a wealthy gop fundraiser, was guilty of child porn and abusing his kids?

Anonymous wrote:Okay lets pretend DNA is not a thing. What makes more sense?

8 yo brother fashioned a garrote strangled his sister and sexually assaulted her. After the fact, mom and dad covered it up by pashing her head in m using a stun gun and writing a note to make it seem real

or

Mom and dad were allowing the kids to be abused and one ended up dead and they coverd it up.

Are you dense or intentionally obtuse?

You have the order of things all.backwards. There's an extensive Reddit on this case if you want to get up to speed.

Anonymous wrote:How many of you follow black children being killed and cases never solved?

Start your own thread if not interested in this one ( not op)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Makes no sense for brother to be cleared via DNA but mom wrote the note?wtf?

Exactly. Maybe moms with sons who have anger issues don't want to believe that this could very well be their family. I wouldn't want to believe it.

Some of you just want to believe little boys are evil predators. You know who else has"anger issues" kids who are abused .

Okay lets pretend DNA is not a thing. What makes more sense?

8 yo brother fashioned a garrote strangled his sister and sexually assaulted her. After the fact, mom and dad covered it up by pashing her head in m using a stun gun and writing a note to make it seem real

or

Mom and dad were allowing the kids to be abused and one ended up dead and they coverd it up.

It's clear that some people haven't read anything about this case since 2005.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Makes no sense for brother to be cleared via DNA but mom wrote the note?wtf?

Hand writing evidence has been deemed inconclusive.

Yes, mom was NOT ruled out.

Anonymous wrote:Makes no sense for brother to be cleared via DNA but mom wrote the note?wtf?

Exactly. Maybe moms with sons who have anger issues don't want to believe that this could very well be their family. I wouldn't want to believe it.

Anonymous wrote:Makes no sense for brother to be cleared via DNA but mom wrote the note?wtf?

Hand writing evidence has been deemed inconclusive.

Anonymous wrote:The mom wrote the note, the dad covered up that he knew where her body was...why would they do this for anyone but the brother? Likely unless he talks sometime before his passing there will be nothing definitive, and obviously it's theoretically possible it's anyone from the gardener to aliens, but some people seem oddly dismissive of the vast set of facts in front of them.

DNA evidence cleared all male members of the Ramsey family. So no it's not the brother.


They would do it to cover for themselves or to cover for a bigger crime at play think Epstein like ring.

Makes no sense for brother to be cleared via DNA but mom wrote the note?wtf?

The mom wrote the note, the dad covered up that he knew where her body was...why would they do this for anyone but the brother? Likely unless he talks sometime before his passing there will be nothing definitive, and obviously it's theoretically possible it's anyone from the gardener to aliens, but some people seem oddly dismissive of the vast set of facts in front of them.