Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?211+sum+SB1303
It says choice of students actually doing the in-person learning is up to parents/guardians and doesn't specify the number of days, but districts must offer it.
It's on the docket for the education committee today.
The sponsor of this is a doctor who got written up by HHS for using her patient roles to send political mailers & solicitations (and who only escaped sanction because she’s in the party who controls the HHS). Sounds like someone who truly has the best intentions and almost sound advisers.
Yes. And the governor wore black face. And the president elect’s son traded off his father’s office to get paid. And the current President has been impeached, twice, including for inciting an insurrection.
Let’s all agree that politics is messy business that attracts folks who work well in that environment. Now. Let’s look at the merits.
You can agree with the CDC and the American Academy of Pediatrics and open schools, or you can keep them closed based on your political support from teachers associations (who do not exist and have no power).
*applause*
Most bi-partisan thing I think I have ever seen on DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?211+sum+SB1303
It says choice of students actually doing the in-person learning is up to parents/guardians and doesn't specify the number of days, but districts must offer it.
It's on the docket for the education committee today.
The sponsor of this is a doctor who got written up by HHS for using her patient roles to send political mailers & solicitations (and who only escaped sanction because she’s in the party who controls the HHS). Sounds like someone who truly has the best intentions and almost sound advisers.
Yes. And the governor wore black face. And the president elect’s son traded off his father’s office to get paid. And the current President has been impeached, twice, including for inciting an insurrection.
Let’s all agree that politics is messy business that attracts folks who work well in that environment. Now. Let’s look at the merits.
You can agree with the CDC and the American Academy of Pediatrics and open schools, or you can keep them closed based on your political support from teachers associations (who do not exist and have no power).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?211+sum+SB1303
It says choice of students actually doing the in-person learning is up to parents/guardians and doesn't specify the number of days, but districts must offer it.
It's on the docket for the education committee today.
The sponsor of this is a doctor who got written up by HHS for using her patient roles to send political mailers & solicitations (and who only escaped sanction because she’s in the party who controls the HHS). Sounds like someone who truly has the best intentions and almost sound advisers.
Sounds like you are grasping desperately at straws to have the whole year off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone cowtows to the teachers.
This has literally never been true.
I know. If staffing is an issue, that is an HR problem. If teachers are told to go in, they will go in or not get paid. It would be humane of you to let them all get vaccinated first, though.
They are being vaccinated starting this week. Its happening! get everyone that first, very effective dose and let's get the show on the road.
Yeah, well you know how “well” Braband organized going back to school this semester? So far, somehow, he is making the vaccine rollout way slower and more complicated than it needs to be. I want to be able to see my seniors before they graduate. Not happy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?211+sum+SB1303
It says choice of students actually doing the in-person learning is up to parents/guardians and doesn't specify the number of days, but districts must offer it.
It's on the docket for the education committee today.
The sponsor of this is a doctor who got written up by HHS for using her patient roles to send political mailers & solicitations (and who only escaped sanction because she’s in the party who controls the HHS). Sounds like someone who truly has the best intentions and almost sound advisers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone cowtows to the teachers.
This has literally never been true.
I know. If staffing is an issue, that is an HR problem. If teachers are told to go in, they will go in or not get paid. It would be humane of you to let them all get vaccinated first, though.
They are being vaccinated starting this week. Its happening! get everyone that first, very effective dose and let's get the show on the road.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?211+sum+SB1303
It says choice of students actually doing the in-person learning is up to parents/guardians and doesn't specify the number of days, but districts must offer it.
It's on the docket for the education committee today.
The sponsor of this is a doctor who got written up by HHS for using her patient roles to send political mailers & solicitations (and who only escaped sanction because she’s in the party who controls the HHS). Sounds like someone who truly has the best intentions and almost sound advisers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone cowtows to the teachers.
This has literally never been true.
I know. If staffing is an issue, that is an HR problem. If teachers are told to go in, they will go in or not get paid. It would be humane of you to let them all get vaccinated first, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone cowtows to the teachers.
This has literally never been true.
I know. If staffing is an issue, that is an HR problem. If teachers are told to go in, they will go in or not get paid. It would be humane of you to let them all get vaccinated first, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?211+sum+SB1303
It says choice of students actually doing the in-person learning is up to parents/guardians and doesn't specify the number of days, but districts must offer it.
It's on the docket for the education committee today.
The sponsor of this is a doctor who got written up by HHS for using her patient roles to send political mailers & solicitations (and who only escaped sanction because she’s in the party who controls the HHS). Sounds like someone who truly has the best intentions and almost sound advisers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?211+sum+SB1303
It says choice of students actually doing the in-person learning is up to parents/guardians and doesn't specify the number of days, but districts must offer it.
It's on the docket for the education committee today.
The sponsor of this is a doctor who got written up by HHS for using her patient roles to send political mailers & solicitations (and who only escaped sanction because she’s in the party who controls the HHS). Sounds like someone who truly has the best intentions and almost sound advisers.
The co-sponsor is Chap Petersen...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone cowtows to the teachers.
This has literally never been true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?211+sum+SB1303
It says choice of students actually doing the in-person learning is up to parents/guardians and doesn't specify the number of days, but districts must offer it.
It's on the docket for the education committee today.
The sponsor of this is a doctor who got written up by HHS for using her patient roles to send political mailers & solicitations (and who only escaped sanction because she’s in the party who controls the HHS). Sounds like someone who truly has the best intentions and almost sound advisers.
Anonymous wrote:https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?211+sum+SB1303
It says choice of students actually doing the in-person learning is up to parents/guardians and doesn't specify the number of days, but districts must offer it.
It's on the docket for the education committee today.