Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m ready to pick virtual at this point just so this crazy train is over for my kid. I think virtual is sub par and I’d like to see her go back in when it’s safer, which really could be this year. But if they force the issue now, I guess she’s virtual the rest of the year.
This is what many of us already did. We weren’t die hard DL types but forced into it by APS’s insistence that you couldn’t switch. It sucks. And it’s not good for kids.
100% this. We chose virtual because we saw the writing on the wall. It sucks, and there were only about 12 kids in a grade of 80 who did. I’m not pushing teachers back when it’s not safe, and you know it’s not safe.
Yes. We are part of the 20% minority at our school. Didn’t want DL for the year but didn’t like the way APS kept being shifty about metrics. Now, we are stuck in DL for the year. But preferable to being forced in with virus spinning out of control. Really a nightmare. This is how teachers, who have no choice, feel too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m ready to pick virtual at this point just so this crazy train is over for my kid. I think virtual is sub par and I’d like to see her go back in when it’s safer, which really could be this year. But if they force the issue now, I guess she’s virtual the rest of the year.
This is what many of us already did. We weren’t die hard DL types but forced into it by APS’s insistence that you couldn’t switch. It sucks. And it’s not good for kids.
100% this. We chose virtual because we saw the writing on the wall. It sucks, and there were only about 12 kids in a grade of 80 who did. I’m not pushing teachers back when it’s not safe, and you know it’s not safe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m ready to pick virtual at this point just so this crazy train is over for my kid. I think virtual is sub par and I’d like to see her go back in when it’s safer, which really could be this year. But if they force the issue now, I guess she’s virtual the rest of the year.
This is what many of us already did. We weren’t die hard DL types but forced into it by APS’s insistence that you couldn’t switch. It sucks. And it’s not good for kids.
100% this. We chose virtual because we saw the writing on the wall. It sucks, and there were only about 12 kids in a grade of 80 who did. I’m not pushing teachers back when it’s not safe, and you know it’s not safe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m ready to pick virtual at this point just so this crazy train is over for my kid. I think virtual is sub par and I’d like to see her go back in when it’s safer, which really could be this year. But if they force the issue now, I guess she’s virtual the rest of the year.
This is what many of us already did. We weren’t die hard DL types but forced into it by APS’s insistence that you couldn’t switch. It sucks. And it’s not good for kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can anyone explain how the concurrent model works logistically? Will the teacher be sitting at his/her desk in front of their computer (with mask on) and teaching from there to both the hybrid and DL students?
Yes. We display the class meet to the smart screen. Kids in class watch it there. Kids at home participate via device as always. In theory the kids in room respond to the chat and the kids at home respond out loud and everyone hears because of the computer being hooked up to the speaker in the room. When it’s time for activities kids do them on their device as always. Maybe at home kids go to breakouts and in person kids are a group. More likely, since most of my in person sections have 2-3 kids they all just do their work on their device.
We can’t break 6 feet so I can’t go to their desk, work right alongside them, etc. At best the difference is I can see them screwing off and make them get back on task. But I’m still answering DL kids via the chat and whatever the in person kids ask I can respond to them. Otherwise activities and instruction remain the same.
People will be quick to say this sucks but there is a lot of value to the kids being in an environment that isn’t their home and with their peers who are all doing what they’re supposed to be doing. In terms of staying on task, etc.
But yes it is imperfect.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can anyone explain how the concurrent model works logistically? Will the teacher be sitting at his/her desk in front of their computer (with mask on) and teaching from there to both the hybrid and DL students?
Yes.
Anonymous wrote:Can anyone explain how the concurrent model works logistically? Will the teacher be sitting at his/her desk in front of their computer (with mask on) and teaching from there to both the hybrid and DL students?
Anonymous wrote:I’m ready to pick virtual at this point just so this crazy train is over for my kid. I think virtual is sub par and I’d like to see her go back in when it’s safer, which really could be this year. But if they force the issue now, I guess she’s virtual the rest of the year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No switching???? They asked parents to pick in October, completely erased the metrics, virus rates are sky high and they just drastically changed the model. Parents should have a fit!
That's what the ATS principal said at the PTA meeting this week. No switching. Not pleased to hear that certain other schools are allowing it. Where is the CONSISTENCY of policies across schools? Ugh. APS you suck.
Umm you should complain to APS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can anyone explain how the concurrent model works logistically? Will the teacher be sitting at his/her desk in front of their computer (with mask on) and teaching from there to both the hybrid and DL students?
Yes. We display the class meet to the smart screen. Kids in class watch it there. Kids at home participate via device as always. In theory the kids in room respond to the chat and the kids at home respond out loud and everyone hears because of the computer being hooked up to the speaker in the room. When it’s time for activities kids do them on their device as always. Maybe at home kids go to breakouts and in person kids are a group. More likely, since most of my in person sections have 2-3 kids they all just do their work on their device.
We can’t break 6 feet so I can’t go to their desk, work right alongside them, etc. At best the difference is I can see them screwing off and make them get back on task. But I’m still answering DL kids via the chat and whatever the in person kids ask I can respond to them. Otherwise activities and instruction remain the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can anyone explain how the concurrent model works logistically? Will the teacher be sitting at his/her desk in front of their computer (with mask on) and teaching from there to both the hybrid and DL students?
Yes. We display the class meet to the smart screen. Kids in class watch it there. Kids at home participate via device as always. In theory the kids in room respond to the chat and the kids at home respond out loud and everyone hears because of the computer being hooked up to the speaker in the room. When it’s time for activities kids do them on their device as always. Maybe at home kids go to breakouts and in person kids are a group. More likely, since most of my in person sections have 2-3 kids they all just do their work on their device.
We can’t break 6 feet so I can’t go to their desk, work right alongside them, etc. At best the difference is I can see them screwing off and make them get back on task. But I’m still answering DL kids via the chat and whatever the in person kids ask I can respond to them. Otherwise activities and instruction remain the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No switching???? They asked parents to pick in October, completely erased the metrics, virus rates are sky high and they just drastically changed the model. Parents should have a fit!
That's what the ATS principal said at the PTA meeting this week. No switching. Not pleased to hear that certain other schools are allowing it. Where is the CONSISTENCY of policies across schools? Ugh. APS you suck.
Anonymous wrote:Can anyone explain how the concurrent model works logistically? Will the teacher be sitting at his/her desk in front of their computer (with mask on) and teaching from there to both the hybrid and DL students?