Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:J
I did the same thing. I have a folder with old camp receipts just in case I fall short of what I put into FSA. It's very easy to doctor the receipts and even my accountant (who is somewhat conservative) said I could just put a random SS for the babysitter I was using but I decided to use the camp receipts instead. I highly doubt they would go back and check everything for the 3000 I submitted for.
My kids are older now (18+) so haven't done the dependent care FSA in a while but when I had it, I used to do exactly this. They did karate camp one summer and didn't want to go back. I used the same receipt and white inked over the date and used a date from the current year. I don't think the IRS cross-verifies this to the provider's income. If they did, I'd have been caught several years. We are talking $1000ish dollars each year. It was my money and I wanted it back.
Anonymous wrote:Why did you lose 2019 money? Covid was in 2020
Anonymous wrote:Jist doctor up the reciepts... litterally NO ONE will hint you down over this. Keep the care receipts below $600 so the IRS doesn't have evidence of taxable income to the private party you listed as care provider. Problem solved. Screw the IRS and this awful scam from our government to create another way to filter money from people.
Think about it... If million people lose even 100 bucks in these accounts, that is another 100 million that gets taken from people to be used at will. I promise you the number is higher than 100 million. Do you really think they are coming after the little folks who were smart enough to dodge the scam by simply scamming the scam back?
Anonymous wrote:The entire FSA system makes no sense. Congress could achieve the same results at far lower cost and with less administrative hassle and without arbitrarily excluding people whose employers don’t offer these plans by just allowing an above the line deduction for eligible expenses subject to the same cap.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have always hated the system where you have to guess (months before the year even starts) what your needs will be for the whole year and then you are penalized by losing the money if you guess wrong. I think that is extraordinarily unfair (especially when it comes to the health care FSA because there is no way to know in advance what your healthcare needs will be or how much they will cost!). I don't understand why Congress hasn't required that people get the money they deposited back! Thankfully, we were given the option to stop contributing at some point last year, but I still lost money. It's not going to break us, and we are luckier than many people since our jobs are safe, but it still irks me to no end.
Congress won't care because they have bigger concerns that UMC people who lost money in a tax advantaged account that most Americans don't have access to. The whole idea that the ability to use pre-tax money for certain services is based on an employer's whim is absurd, but the there are larger problems too address right now
Hmm yes, congress seems to have been focusing on UC people and ALL their tax advantages.
Congress doesn't care about the UMC. They're either throwing scraps to the poors or making tax cuts for the rich. Those in the $250k - $400k bracket are screwed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if the Congress even had to be involved. Could the IRS have just issued a one-time rule?
There was a grace period early on in the pandemic when people were offered the opportunity to stop or change their contributions. They also expanded allowable expenses to cover a lot of OTC items. OP has not been paying attention.
You do know what DP stands for don’t you?
I am a DP, and I did reduce my contributions. At that time our school was planning to do hybrid and I thought kids would be in a camp on non school days. Then hybrid was completely canceled and the programs I was planning weren’t feasible anymore, so I wasn’t able to use the money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have always hated the system where you have to guess (months before the year even starts) what your needs will be for the whole year and then you are penalized by losing the money if you guess wrong. I think that is extraordinarily unfair (especially when it comes to the health care FSA because there is no way to know in advance what your healthcare needs will be or how much they will cost!). I don't understand why Congress hasn't required that people get the money they deposited back! Thankfully, we were given the option to stop contributing at some point last year, but I still lost money. It's not going to break us, and we are luckier than many people since our jobs are safe, but it still irks me to no end.
Congress won't care because they have bigger concerns that UMC people who lost money in a tax advantaged account that most Americans don't have access to. The whole idea that the ability to use pre-tax money for certain services is based on an employer's whim is absurd, but the there are larger problems too address right now
Anonymous wrote:I have always hated the system where you have to guess (months before the year even starts) what your needs will be for the whole year and then you are penalized by losing the money if you guess wrong. I think that is extraordinarily unfair (especially when it comes to the health care FSA because there is no way to know in advance what your healthcare needs will be or how much they will cost!). I don't understand why Congress hasn't required that people get the money they deposited back! Thankfully, we were given the option to stop contributing at some point last year, but I still lost money. It's not going to break us, and we are luckier than many people since our jobs are safe, but it still irks me to no end.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if the Congress even had to be involved. Could the IRS have just issued a one-time rule?
There was a grace period early on in the pandemic when people were offered the opportunity to stop or change their contributions. They also expanded allowable expenses to cover a lot of OTC items. OP has not been paying attention.
Anonymous wrote:This is a feature, not a bug. It's what allows participants in the system to use money targeted for contribution before it is actually contributed (at least for the Health Care FSA). It also makes it significantly easier to administer, and prevents, to a certain extent, the program from being a giveaway to upper middle class families.
It's a unified whole, and you need to either take it or leave it.