Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, tennis bracelets are classic but not hugely popular right now for the 20-30s set. I think they are seen as a bit matronly.
The women who I know with nice bracelets have the Carter Love, JUC, VCA Sweet or 5 Motif, or a bangle from Bulgari or Hermès.
I think tennis bracelets are due for a comeback.
They never went away. Go look on any of the sites that sell jewelry that allow you to see what has been sold - ebay, 1st dibs, etc. They are one of the most likely to sell pieces of jewelry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Patek Phillipe or Jaeger Le Coultre Reverso watch
Anything but Rolex.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, tennis bracelets are classic but not hugely popular right now for the 20-30s set. I think they are seen as a bit matronly.
The women who I know with nice bracelets have the Carter Love, JUC, VCA Sweet or 5 Motif, or a bangle from Bulgari or Hermès.
I think tennis bracelets are due for a comeback.
There was an article in Fortune recently on the new tennis bracelets. I can’t find the article, but bookmarked some of the jewelry. These are not your mother’s tennis bracelets!
https://www.gabrielny.com/products-fashion/category-bg-tb/style-tennis
https://nicolerosejewelry.com/collections/bracelets
Those bracelets are much more lightweight - smaller, thinner, and have much less gold, than any older bracelet. I bet the diamonds in them are very poor quality. You're getting so much less now with gold prices being so high. I would go to Tysons Watch and Jewelry or Ebah/Etsy and get a piece a few years older that isn't junk. It's just like all those jewelry lines that are mostly sterling. They sell that stuff for high end prices using low end materials.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those Gabriel NY bracelets are gorgeous!
Who even wears bracelets? They seem like the most impractical piece of jewelry, maybe one step above an anklet
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, tennis bracelets are classic but not hugely popular right now for the 20-30s set. I think they are seen as a bit matronly.
The women who I know with nice bracelets have the Carter Love, JUC, VCA Sweet or 5 Motif, or a bangle from Bulgari or Hermès.
I think tennis bracelets are due for a comeback.
There was an article in Fortune recently on the new tennis bracelets. I can’t find the article, but bookmarked some of the jewelry. These are not your mother’s tennis bracelets!
https://www.gabrielny.com/products-fashion/category-bg-tb/style-tennis
https://nicolerosejewelry.com/collections/bracelets
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, tennis bracelets are classic but not hugely popular right now for the 20-30s set. I think they are seen as a bit matronly.
The women who I know with nice bracelets have the Carter Love, JUC, VCA Sweet or 5 Motif, or a bangle from Bulgari or Hermès.
I think tennis bracelets are due for a comeback.
Anonymous wrote:Patek Phillipe or Jaeger Le Coultre Reverso watch
Anonymous wrote:Rolex watch
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would get diamond studs, mikimoto pearls, a Cartier watch.
I wouldn’t get a bracelet. I don’t think they get much wear. I’m in long sleeves and/or a jacket for 8 months out of the year and a bracelet gets covered. It is rarely my pick.
These are nice items but so generic. In 30 years you will definitely be able to find the exact same items. Something unique that isn’t in every single person’s wardrobe would make more sense.
Cartier love bracelets and Van Cleef Alhambra jewelry are also generic. They're like the Louis Vuitton Neverfull of jewelry.