Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mitch hasn’t offered anything good, but at this point it’s clear that he’s not going to. He has the power, he doesn’t care about doing the right thing, just pass the crappy bill he wants and blame him for the mess that we have to clean up next year. Something. Is better than nothing right now. Really.
Not if it permanently provide liability shield for irresponsible employers.
Anonymous wrote:Mitch hasn’t offered anything good, but at this point it’s clear that he’s not going to. He has the power, he doesn’t care about doing the right thing, just pass the crappy bill he wants and blame him for the mess that we have to clean up next year. Something. Is better than nothing right now. Really.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Congress needs to get their shit together. They're literally arguing over what are tantamount to pennies, all for political theater and pissing matches. Jobless claims just went up. It'll be a disaster if unemployment and protections disappear in Jan. I think, however, they will pass something before recess, because neither party wants to be responsible for chaos right before a big GA runoff.
Looks, it's not hard.
No bills with pork.
Give states money
Give employers liability protections
Extend unemployment out to April
Done. No one gets everything they want.
The Republicans have been saying for months that the money to states is pork.
Anonymous wrote:Congress needs to get their shit together. They're literally arguing over what are tantamount to pennies, all for political theater and pissing matches. Jobless claims just went up. It'll be a disaster if unemployment and protections disappear in Jan. I think, however, they will pass something before recess, because neither party wants to be responsible for chaos right before a big GA runoff.
Looks, it's not hard.
No bills with pork.
Give states money
Give employers liability protections
Extend unemployment out to April
Done. No one gets everything they want.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pelosi and Schumer needs to pass this bill.
Sucks, but Mitch can and will do whatever he wants. You want any aid, you have to agree with him.
WhT I don’t understand is how P and S are so bad at explaining that to everyday people.
It isn't that they're bad at explaining it to everyday people, it's that the message gets drowned out by the Republican propaganda machine bleating about how Democrats want to shut cities down and kill small businesses that employ patriotic hardworking real Americans.
THIS.
The mainstream media carries water for the GOP and the for the GOP alone. Their messaging is always related, their messaging becomes the narrative. The Democrats are always relegated to some nonsensical position, even as Rep Porter points out that it is one anarchist holding up this whole entire thing. One man with Chinese and Russian money lining his pockets, encouraging him to disrupt and ruin America.
I mean...the GOP is right on this one. I’ve watched them extend full stand-alone unemployment bills and stimulus checks for months.
What did Pelosi do? Turn them down.
$1.8 trillion deal pre-election with every wishlist item. What did Pelosi do? Turn them down.
Everytime an offer is made Pelosi’s grand stance is ‘Its not enough’.
So where are we now? A bill worth a quarter of the initial request, no unemployment or no stimulus, barely any local/state aid. Seriously the Dems had a great hand and just - killed it.
Yup. Pelosi has done a terrible job with this negotiation. If you've ever taken a negotiating course, you learn that if you become too inflexible the concessions dry up over time. Pelosi is now gonna have to take a deal that's half a big as the $1.8T that was offered before. That just shows Pelosi was playing stupid politics, and now it has backfired. The $1.8T deal have huge money to states, unployment and $1200 checks. Pelosi stupidly rejected it. Now it is even lower. Pelosi is a terrible politician.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pelosi and Schumer needs to pass this bill.
Sucks, but Mitch can and will do whatever he wants. You want any aid, you have to agree with him.
WhT I don’t understand is how P and S are so bad at explaining that to everyday people.
It isn't that they're bad at explaining it to everyday people, it's that the message gets drowned out by the Republican propaganda machine bleating about how Democrats want to shut cities down and kill small businesses that employ patriotic hardworking real Americans.
THIS.
The mainstream media carries water for the GOP and the for the GOP alone. Their messaging is always related, their messaging becomes the narrative. The Democrats are always relegated to some nonsensical position, even as Rep Porter points out that it is one anarchist holding up this whole entire thing. One man with Chinese and Russian money lining his pockets, encouraging him to disrupt and ruin America.
I mean...the GOP is right on this one. I’ve watched them extend full stand-alone unemployment bills and stimulus checks for months.
What did Pelosi do? Turn them down.
$1.8 trillion deal pre-election with every wishlist item. What did Pelosi do? Turn them down.
Everytime an offer is made Pelosi’s grand stance is ‘Its not enough’.
So where are we now? A bill worth a quarter of the initial request, no unemployment or no stimulus, barely any local/state aid. Seriously the Dems had a great hand and just - killed it.
Yup. Pelosi has done a terrible job with this negotiation. If you've ever taken a negotiating course, you learn that if you become too inflexible the concessions dry up over time. Pelosi is now gonna have to take a deal that's half a big as the $1.8T that was offered before. That just shows Pelosi was playing stupid politics, and now it has backfired. The $1.8T deal have huge money to states, unployment and $1200 checks. Pelosi stupidly rejected it. Now it is even lower. Pelosi is a terrible politician.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pelosi and Schumer needs to pass this bill.
Sucks, but Mitch can and will do whatever he wants. You want any aid, you have to agree with him.
WhT I don’t understand is how P and S are so bad at explaining that to everyday people.
It isn't that they're bad at explaining it to everyday people, it's that the message gets drowned out by the Republican propaganda machine bleating about how Democrats want to shut cities down and kill small businesses that employ patriotic hardworking real Americans.
THIS.
The mainstream media carries water for the GOP and the for the GOP alone. Their messaging is always related, their messaging becomes the narrative. The Democrats are always relegated to some nonsensical position, even as Rep Porter points out that it is one anarchist holding up this whole entire thing. One man with Chinese and Russian money lining his pockets, encouraging him to disrupt and ruin America.
I mean...the GOP is right on this one. I’ve watched them extend full stand-alone unemployment bills and stimulus checks for months.
What did Pelosi do? Turn them down.
$1.8 trillion deal pre-election with every wishlist item. What did Pelosi do? Turn them down.
Everytime an offer is made Pelosi’s grand stance is ‘Its not enough’.
So where are we now? A bill worth a quarter of the initial request, no unemployment or no stimulus, barely any local/state aid. Seriously the Dems had a great hand and just - killed it.
Anonymous wrote:Congress needs to get their shit together. They're literally arguing over what are tantamount to pennies, all for political theater and pissing matches. Jobless claims just went up. It'll be a disaster if unemployment and protections disappear in Jan. I think, however, they will pass something before recess, because neither party wants to be responsible for chaos right before a big GA runoff.
Looks, it's not hard.
No bills with pork.
Give states money
Give employers liability protections
Extend unemployment out to April
Done. No one gets everything they want.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pelosi and Schumer needs to pass this bill.
Sucks, but Mitch can and will do whatever he wants. You want any aid, you have to agree with him.
WhT I don’t understand is how P and S are so bad at explaining that to everyday people.
It isn't that they're bad at explaining it to everyday people, it's that the message gets drowned out by the Republican propaganda machine bleating about how Democrats want to shut cities down and kill small businesses that employ patriotic hardworking real Americans.
THIS.
The mainstream media carries water for the GOP and the for the GOP alone. Their messaging is always related, their messaging becomes the narrative. The Democrats are always relegated to some nonsensical position, even as Rep Porter points out that it is one anarchist holding up this whole entire thing. One man with Chinese and Russian money lining his pockets, encouraging him to disrupt and ruin America.
I mean...the GOP is right on this one. I’ve watched them extend full stand-alone unemployment bills and stimulus checks for months.
What did Pelosi do? Turn them down.
$1.8 trillion deal pre-election with every wishlist item. What did Pelosi do? Turn them down.
Everytime an offer is made Pelosi’s grand stance is ‘Its not enough’.
So where are we now? A bill worth a quarter of the initial request, no unemployment or no stimulus, barely any local/state aid. Seriously the Dems had a great hand and just - killed it.
Which proposals did Mitch McConnell say he would support that Nancy Pelosi rejected? Please provide links to substantiate any claims you make about Mitch McConnell expressing support for a particular proposal.
Don't be obtuse. If you were watching the talks you'd know negotiations prior to December 2020 were handled by Pelosi+Schumer representing the Democrats in both House+Senate and Mnuchin+Meadows representing the White House plus GOP House+Senate.
The proposals were all raised by M+M without comment or objection from McConnell.
But none of them could pass without McConnell’s approval, and that was the whole problem - Mnuchin was negotiating on behalf of Republicans because McConnell wasn’t willing to do it, because McConnell opposed passing a relief bill.. All of those negotiations were largely for show because McConnell refused to get on board, which means the bill wouldn’t have gotten a vote in the Senate.
 Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pelosi and Schumer needs to pass this bill.
Sucks, but Mitch can and will do whatever he wants. You want any aid, you have to agree with him.
WhT I don’t understand is how P and S are so bad at explaining that to everyday people.
It isn't that they're bad at explaining it to everyday people, it's that the message gets drowned out by the Republican propaganda machine bleating about how Democrats want to shut cities down and kill small businesses that employ patriotic hardworking real Americans.
THIS.
The mainstream media carries water for the GOP and the for the GOP alone. Their messaging is always related, their messaging becomes the narrative. The Democrats are always relegated to some nonsensical position, even as Rep Porter points out that it is one anarchist holding up this whole entire thing. One man with Chinese and Russian money lining his pockets, encouraging him to disrupt and ruin America.
I mean...the GOP is right on this one. I’ve watched them extend full stand-alone unemployment bills and stimulus checks for months.
What did Pelosi do? Turn them down.
$1.8 trillion deal pre-election with every wishlist item. What did Pelosi do? Turn them down.
Everytime an offer is made Pelosi’s grand stance is ‘Its not enough’.
So where are we now? A bill worth a quarter of the initial request, no unemployment or no stimulus, barely any local/state aid. Seriously the Dems had a great hand and just - killed it.
Which proposals did Mitch McConnell say he would support that Nancy Pelosi rejected? Please provide links to substantiate any claims you make about Mitch McConnell expressing support for a particular proposal.
Don't be obtuse. If you were watching the talks you'd know negotiations prior to December 2020 were handled by Pelosi+Schumer representing the Democrats in both House+Senate and Mnuchin+Meadows representing the White House plus GOP House+Senate.
The proposals were all raised by M+M without comment or objection from McConnell.