Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't this make these lots, even if they have a SFH on them already, more valuable?
potentially but imagine how neighborhoods would look during a transition. One family sells to a developer who puts up a 4 unit apartment building with no parking and on another lot a developer puts up 4 small houses and on another lot a developer puts up 4 townhouses. Part of the value is the aesthetics.
meanwhile all these new builds have no parking and your streets are now littered with 4 times the cars. Now if a developer comes in a makes it look great and high-end sure but the county probably won't allow that seeing they are pushing affordable housing
This exactly. Nobody with income wants to live in those kinds of dumpy neighborhoods.
You mean the dumpy neighborhoods of Georgetown, with all of the duplexes, mansions with basement apartments, condo conversions and apartment buildings? You mean we don't want to be like the District? Where housing values have soared, compared to Bethesda?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This exactly. Nobody with income wants to live in those kinds of dumpy neighborhoods.
That is exactly the point. There's a lack of middle housing in MoCo, especially in downcounty MoCo. There's not much available between scattered MPDUs and $1.5mm homes.
Oh, yes there are! Plenty of original 1930s-40s housing stock, some still without central air. We (the original owners) tend to be teachers, non-profit workers, and government workers, and we're afraid of being priced out of our own neighborhoods, due to rising tax assessments and high cost of living in Bethesda and Chevy Chase. Happy to redevelop and build our retirement home with advanced age-in-place features, apartments for the darling NIH post-doc families and students, and condos for young families. The Council needs to EMPOWER the owners of these older houses to make these changes without being sold down the river, as most developers underbid for the old homes and then make huge $$$$$$. This can be a real win-win if approached holistically.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't this make these lots, even if they have a SFH on them already, more valuable?
potentially but imagine how neighborhoods would look during a transition. One family sells to a developer who puts up a 4 unit apartment building with no parking and on another lot a developer puts up 4 small houses and on another lot a developer puts up 4 townhouses. Part of the value is the aesthetics.
meanwhile all these new builds have no parking and your streets are now littered with 4 times the cars. Now if a developer comes in a makes it look great and high-end sure but the county probably won't allow that seeing they are pushing affordable housing
This exactly. Nobody with income wants to live in those kinds of dumpy neighborhoods.
You mean the dumpy neighborhoods of Georgetown, with all of the duplexes, mansions with basement apartments, condo conversions and apartment buildings? You mean we don't want to be like the District? Where housing values have soared, compared to Bethesda?
Anonymous wrote:County politics watchers: what do you think are the chances that Jawando is able to get this passed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This exactly. Nobody with income wants to live in those kinds of dumpy neighborhoods.
That is exactly the point. There's a lack of middle housing in MoCo, especially in downcounty MoCo. There's not much available between scattered MPDUs and $1.5mm homes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't this make these lots, even if they have a SFH on them already, more valuable?
potentially but imagine how neighborhoods would look during a transition. One family sells to a developer who puts up a 4 unit apartment building with no parking and on another lot a developer puts up 4 small houses and on another lot a developer puts up 4 townhouses. Part of the value is the aesthetics.
meanwhile all these new builds have no parking and your streets are now littered with 4 times the cars. Now if a developer comes in a makes it look great and high-end sure but the county probably won't allow that seeing they are pushing affordable housing
This exactly. Nobody with income wants to live in those kinds of dumpy neighborhoods.
Nope. Everyone will move to Fort Washington if this bill passes!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't this make these lots, even if they have a SFH on them already, more valuable?
potentially but imagine how neighborhoods would look during a transition. One family sells to a developer who puts up a 4 unit apartment building with no parking and on another lot a developer puts up 4 small houses and on another lot a developer puts up 4 townhouses. Part of the value is the aesthetics.
meanwhile all these new builds have no parking and your streets are now littered with 4 times the cars. Now if a developer comes in a makes it look great and high-end sure but the county probably won't allow that seeing they are pushing affordable housing
This exactly. Nobody with income wants to live in those kinds of dumpy neighborhoods.