Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait so the whole agreement just signed will amount to nothing more than these few high needs kids back? What about schools where most kids are high needs?
In those schools, the highest of the high needs would be prioritized. Or do you think teachers from Janney should be taken to staff Title 1 schools? I’m guessing not. On a school-by-school basis, it looks like DCPS wants to prioritize the highest needs kids. And I fully expect the selfish parents of DCUM land to flip out over that.
Anonymous wrote:When will we know if our schools plan was accepted?
Anonymous wrote:Wait so the whole agreement just signed will amount to nothing more than these few high needs kids back? What about schools where most kids are high needs?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does nobody else think it is INSANITY that this is being executed on a building by building basis?
you can thank the union
Are we back this this again, Karen?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don’t worry. Dcps has rejected my schools plan. And according to friends at three other schools, their plans have been rejected as well.
what was the plan?
Hybrid so we could get the maximum number of children in the building who wanted it. We were told the priority was at risk, sped, ell must be 4 days a week.
Anonymous wrote:Wait so the whole agreement just signed will amount to nothing more than these few high needs kids back? What about schools where most kids are high needs?
Anonymous wrote:Wait so the whole agreement just signed will amount to nothing more than these few high needs kids back? What about schools where most kids are high needs?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don’t worry. Dcps has rejected my schools plan. And according to friends at three other schools, their plans have been rejected as well.
what was the plan?
Hybrid so we could get the maximum number of children in the building who wanted it. We were told the priority was at risk, sped, ell must be 4 days a week.
Np: If DCPS requires 4 days/week for at-risk, then why are they pretending that the schools have any decision-making power?
The requirement that at-risk students get 4 days (rather than 2 or maybe 3) precludes every other option that allows lots of kids back to campus, doesn’t throw class sizes out of whack, and that keeps almost all students with their same teachers.
There is a reason the whole rest of the country is doing hybrid — it’s the only way to get most kids back while having half-size classes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don’t worry. Dcps has rejected my schools plan. And according to friends at three other schools, their plans have been rejected as well.
what was the plan?
Hybrid so we could get the maximum number of children in the building who wanted it. We were told the priority was at risk, sped, ell must be 4 days a week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don’t worry. Dcps has rejected my schools plan. And according to friends at three other schools, their plans have been rejected as well.
what was the plan?
Hybrid so we could get the maximum number of children in the building who wanted it. We were told the priority was at risk, sped, ell must be 4 days a week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does nobody else think it is INSANITY that this is being executed on a building by building basis?
you can thank the union
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don’t worry. Dcps has rejected my schools plan. And according to friends at three other schools, their plans have been rejected as well.
what was the plan?