Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You teachers all sound LOVELY. I'm not really sure why any of you got into teaching. Other professions were too hard?
It's because they don't like kids. Kids are annoying, obnoxious, rude, lazy, disrespectful, unmotivated, cheating brats.
So again, why be a teacher then?
3 months of holidays maybe? ‘Decent’ health benefits?
Just thinking out loud. Fwiw I’m also a teacher. It’s my passion. But considering the out of touch and arrogant parents in this area I dont to the extra mile unless it’s to preserve and protect my income. If helicopter mom demands an A for her lazy, sorry excuse of a child, I’ll try my best to not do so. The moment I see my job might need attention you get that A immediately. You dont learn crap. You get your A. But in college or real life you’ll get bytch slapped in the face by reality. And then helicopter mom can go eat fecal matter.
Mrs. A, is that you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You teachers all sound LOVELY. I'm not really sure why any of you got into teaching. Other professions were too hard?
It's because they don't like kids. Kids are annoying, obnoxious, rude, lazy, disrespectful, unmotivated, cheating brats.
So again, why be a teacher then?
3 months of holidays maybe? ‘Decent’ health benefits?
Just thinking out loud. Fwiw I’m also a teacher. It’s my passion. But considering the out of touch and arrogant parents in this area I dont to the extra mile unless it’s to preserve and protect my income. If helicopter mom demands an A for her lazy, sorry excuse of a child, I’ll try my best to not do so. The moment I see my job might need attention you get that A immediately. You dont learn crap. You get your A. But in college or real life you’ll get bytch slapped in the face by reality. And then helicopter mom can go eat fecal matter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You teachers all sound LOVELY. I'm not really sure why any of you got into teaching. Other professions were too hard?
It's because they don't like kids. Kids are annoying, obnoxious, rude, lazy, disrespectful, unmotivated, cheating brats.
Ditto for the parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You teachers all sound LOVELY. I'm not really sure why any of you got into teaching. Other professions were too hard?
It's because they don't like kids. Kids are annoying, obnoxious, rude, lazy, disrespectful, unmotivated, cheating brats.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You teachers all sound LOVELY. I'm not really sure why any of you got into teaching. Other professions were too hard?
It's because they don't like kids. Kids are annoying, obnoxious, rude, lazy, disrespectful, unmotivated, cheating brats.
So again, why be a teacher then?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You teachers all sound LOVELY. I'm not really sure why any of you got into teaching. Other professions were too hard?
It's because they don't like kids. Kids are annoying, obnoxious, rude, lazy, disrespectful, unmotivated, cheating brats.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You teachers all sound LOVELY. I'm not really sure why any of you got into teaching. Other professions were too hard?
It's because they don't like kids. Kids are annoying, obnoxious, rude, lazy, disrespectful, unmotivated, cheating brats.
Anonymous wrote:You teachers all sound LOVELY. I'm not really sure why any of you got into teaching. Other professions were too hard?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get what the debate is. Concurrent is the only way it will work. The other way (separate hybrid and DL) cannot work logistically. Teachers are just against concurrent because without it the default is DL.
We aren’t against it necessarily. We just think it’s going to be hard AF and academically not really much better.
Some students are doing fine in DL. But many aren't, many who were good students last year. They need a teacher's physical presence, the presence of classmates, to keep them engaged, accountable. Concurrent will provide that. DL won't.
This - DL was a fail for my high schooler. Absolutely needs accountability.
Yes we will magically be able to provide more accountability when we see your kid in person... 1 block 1 time a week. I’m going in when they tell me but parents like you expecting miracles of a very, VERY barebones plan that is an appeasement to families but will not provide any academic improvement over DL are going to be so disappointed if you don’t accept what is actually possible in this model.
TeCher here. I’m not going close to your child. In fact I’m not leaving my desk and the plexiglass In front of it. They’ll hear as best as they can so if they’re on the far corner of class with my muzzled voice they’ll just have to get feedback online thru screen. No manipulatives. But at least I get to see them NOT cheating as they’ve been doin thus far. LOL
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get what the debate is. Concurrent is the only way it will work. The other way (separate hybrid and DL) cannot work logistically. Teachers are just against concurrent because without it the default is DL.
We aren’t against it necessarily. We just think it’s going to be hard AF and academically not really much better.
Some students are doing fine in DL. But many aren't, many who were good students last year. They need a teacher's physical presence, the presence of classmates, to keep them engaged, accountable. Concurrent will provide that. DL won't.
This - DL was a fail for my high schooler. Absolutely needs accountability.
Yes we will magically be able to provide more accountability when we see your kid in person... 1 block 1 time a week. I’m going in when they tell me but parents like you expecting miracles of a very, VERY barebones plan that is an appeasement to families but will not provide any academic improvement over DL are going to be so disappointed if you don’t accept what is actually possible in this model.
TeCher here. I’m not going close to your child. In fact I’m not leaving my desk and the plexiglass In front of it. They’ll hear as best as they can so if they’re on the far corner of class with my muzzled voice they’ll just have to get feedback online thru screen. No manipulatives. But at least I get to see them NOT cheating as they’ve been doin thus far. LOL
It’s not good to sit in one place too long. Your ass might hurt.
Hurting glutes > organ failure after catching covid from Larla cos mommy needs time to do her nails and sip mimosas at home![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get what the debate is. Concurrent is the only way it will work. The other way (separate hybrid and DL) cannot work logistically. Teachers are just against concurrent because without it the default is DL.
We aren’t against it necessarily. We just think it’s going to be hard AF and academically not really much better.
Some students are doing fine in DL. But many aren't, many who were good students last year. They need a teacher's physical presence, the presence of classmates, to keep them engaged, accountable. Concurrent will provide that. DL won't.
This - DL was a fail for my high schooler. Absolutely needs accountability.
Yes we will magically be able to provide more accountability when we see your kid in person... 1 block 1 time a week. I’m going in when they tell me but parents like you expecting miracles of a very, VERY barebones plan that is an appeasement to families but will not provide any academic improvement over DL are going to be so disappointed if you don’t accept what is actually possible in this model.
TeCher here. I’m not going close to your child. In fact I’m not leaving my desk and the plexiglass In front of it. They’ll hear as best as they can so if they’re on the far corner of class with my muzzled voice they’ll just have to get feedback online thru screen. No manipulatives. But at least I get to see them NOT cheating as they’ve been doin thus far. LOL
It’s not good to sit in one place too long. Your ass might hurt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get what the debate is. Concurrent is the only way it will work. The other way (separate hybrid and DL) cannot work logistically. Teachers are just against concurrent because without it the default is DL.
We aren’t against it necessarily. We just think it’s going to be hard AF and academically not really much better.
Some students are doing fine in DL. But many aren't, many who were good students last year. They need a teacher's physical presence, the presence of classmates, to keep them engaged, accountable. Concurrent will provide that. DL won't.
This - DL was a fail for my high schooler. Absolutely needs accountability.
Yes we will magically be able to provide more accountability when we see your kid in person... 1 block 1 time a week. I’m going in when they tell me but parents like you expecting miracles of a very, VERY barebones plan that is an appeasement to families but will not provide any academic improvement over DL are going to be so disappointed if you don’t accept what is actually possible in this model.
TeCher here. I’m not going close to your child. In fact I’m not leaving my desk and the plexiglass In front of it. They’ll hear as best as they can so if they’re on the far corner of class with my muzzled voice they’ll just have to get feedback online thru screen. No manipulatives. But at least I get to see them NOT cheating as they’ve been doin thus far. LOL